脓毒症住院患者他汀类药物的使用和死亡率:2008-2018年南加州的回顾性队列研究

IF 1.8 Q3 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Critical Care Research and Practice Pub Date : 2022-05-06 DOI:10.1155/2022/7127531
B. Liang, Su-Jau T Yang, K. Wei, A. S. Yu, Brendan J Kim, M. Gould, J. Sim
{"title":"脓毒症住院患者他汀类药物的使用和死亡率:2008-2018年南加州的回顾性队列研究","authors":"B. Liang, Su-Jau T Yang, K. Wei, A. S. Yu, Brendan J Kim, M. Gould, J. Sim","doi":"10.1155/2022/7127531","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Despite early goal-directed therapy, sepsis mortality remains high. Statins exhibit pleiotropic effects. Objective We sought to compare mortality outcomes among statin users versus nonusers who were hospitalized with sepsis. Methods Retrospective cohort study of patients (age ≥18 years) during 1/1/2008–9/30/2018. Mortality was compared between statin users and nonusers and within statin users (hydrophilic versus lipophilic, fungal versus synthetic derivation, and individual statins head-to-head). Multivariable Cox regression models were used to estimate hazard ratios (HR) for 30-day and 90-day mortality. Inverse probability treatment weighting (IPTW) analysis was performed to account for indication bias. Results Among 128,161 sepsis patients, 34,088 (26.6%) were prescribed statin drugs prior to admission. Statin users compared to nonusers had a 30-day and 90-day mortality HR (95% CI) of 0.80 (0.77–0.83) and 0.79 (0.77–0.81), respectively. Synthetic derived statin users compared to fungal derived users had a 30- and 90-day mortality HR (95% CI) of 0.86 (0.81–0.91) and 0.85 (0.81–0.89), respectively. Hydrophilic statin users compared to lipophilic users had a 30-day and 90-day mortality HR (95% CI) of 0.90 (0.81–1.01) and 0.86 (0.78–0.94), respectively. Compared to simvastatin, 30-day mortality HRs (95% CI) were 0.85 (0.66–1.10), 0.87 (0.82–0.92), 0.87 (0.76–0.98), and 1.22 (1.10–1.36) for rosuvastatin, atorvastatin, pravastatin, and lovastatin, respectively. Conclusion Statin use was associated with lower mortality in patients hospitalized with sepsis. Hydrophilic and synthetic statins were associated with better outcomes than lipophilic and fungal-based preparations.","PeriodicalId":46583,"journal":{"name":"Critical Care Research and Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Statin Use and Mortality among Patients Hospitalized with Sepsis: A Retrospective Cohort Study within Southern California, 2008–2018\",\"authors\":\"B. Liang, Su-Jau T Yang, K. Wei, A. S. Yu, Brendan J Kim, M. Gould, J. Sim\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/2022/7127531\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background Despite early goal-directed therapy, sepsis mortality remains high. Statins exhibit pleiotropic effects. Objective We sought to compare mortality outcomes among statin users versus nonusers who were hospitalized with sepsis. Methods Retrospective cohort study of patients (age ≥18 years) during 1/1/2008–9/30/2018. Mortality was compared between statin users and nonusers and within statin users (hydrophilic versus lipophilic, fungal versus synthetic derivation, and individual statins head-to-head). Multivariable Cox regression models were used to estimate hazard ratios (HR) for 30-day and 90-day mortality. Inverse probability treatment weighting (IPTW) analysis was performed to account for indication bias. Results Among 128,161 sepsis patients, 34,088 (26.6%) were prescribed statin drugs prior to admission. Statin users compared to nonusers had a 30-day and 90-day mortality HR (95% CI) of 0.80 (0.77–0.83) and 0.79 (0.77–0.81), respectively. Synthetic derived statin users compared to fungal derived users had a 30- and 90-day mortality HR (95% CI) of 0.86 (0.81–0.91) and 0.85 (0.81–0.89), respectively. Hydrophilic statin users compared to lipophilic users had a 30-day and 90-day mortality HR (95% CI) of 0.90 (0.81–1.01) and 0.86 (0.78–0.94), respectively. Compared to simvastatin, 30-day mortality HRs (95% CI) were 0.85 (0.66–1.10), 0.87 (0.82–0.92), 0.87 (0.76–0.98), and 1.22 (1.10–1.36) for rosuvastatin, atorvastatin, pravastatin, and lovastatin, respectively. Conclusion Statin use was associated with lower mortality in patients hospitalized with sepsis. Hydrophilic and synthetic statins were associated with better outcomes than lipophilic and fungal-based preparations.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46583,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Critical Care Research and Practice\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Critical Care Research and Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/7127531\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Care Research and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/7127531","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

背景尽管有早期的目标导向治疗,败血症的死亡率仍然很高。他汀类药物具有多效性作用。目的我们试图比较他汀类药物使用者和非使用者因败血症住院的死亡率。方法对2008年1月1日至2018年9月30日期间年龄≥18岁的患者进行回顾性队列研究。比较他汀类药物使用者和非使用者之间以及他汀类药物使用者内部的死亡率(亲水性与亲脂性、真菌性与合成衍生物以及单个他汀类药物的死亡率)。使用多变量Cox回归模型来估计30天和90天死亡率的危险比(HR)。进行反向概率治疗加权(IPTW)分析,以说明适应症偏倚。结果128161例败血症患者中,34088例(26.6%)在入院前服用他汀类药物。他汀类药物使用者与非使用者相比,30天和90天的死亡率HR(95%CI)分别为0.80(0.77-883)和0.79(0.77-881)。合成来源的他汀类药物使用者与真菌来源的使用者相比,30天和90天的死亡率HR(95%CI)分别为0.86(0.81-0.91)和0.85(0.81-0.89)。与亲脂性使用者相比,亲水性他汀类药物使用者的30天和90天死亡率HR(95%CI)分别为0.90(0.81–1.01)和0.86(0.78–0.94)。与辛伐他汀相比,瑞舒伐他汀、阿托伐他汀、普伐他汀和洛伐他汀的30天死亡率HR(95%CI)分别为0.85(0.66–1.10)、0.87(0.82–0.92)、0.87%(0.76–0.98)和1.22(1.10–1.36)。结论使用他汀类药物可降低败血症住院患者的死亡率。亲水性和合成他汀类药物比亲脂性和真菌制剂具有更好的疗效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Statin Use and Mortality among Patients Hospitalized with Sepsis: A Retrospective Cohort Study within Southern California, 2008–2018
Background Despite early goal-directed therapy, sepsis mortality remains high. Statins exhibit pleiotropic effects. Objective We sought to compare mortality outcomes among statin users versus nonusers who were hospitalized with sepsis. Methods Retrospective cohort study of patients (age ≥18 years) during 1/1/2008–9/30/2018. Mortality was compared between statin users and nonusers and within statin users (hydrophilic versus lipophilic, fungal versus synthetic derivation, and individual statins head-to-head). Multivariable Cox regression models were used to estimate hazard ratios (HR) for 30-day and 90-day mortality. Inverse probability treatment weighting (IPTW) analysis was performed to account for indication bias. Results Among 128,161 sepsis patients, 34,088 (26.6%) were prescribed statin drugs prior to admission. Statin users compared to nonusers had a 30-day and 90-day mortality HR (95% CI) of 0.80 (0.77–0.83) and 0.79 (0.77–0.81), respectively. Synthetic derived statin users compared to fungal derived users had a 30- and 90-day mortality HR (95% CI) of 0.86 (0.81–0.91) and 0.85 (0.81–0.89), respectively. Hydrophilic statin users compared to lipophilic users had a 30-day and 90-day mortality HR (95% CI) of 0.90 (0.81–1.01) and 0.86 (0.78–0.94), respectively. Compared to simvastatin, 30-day mortality HRs (95% CI) were 0.85 (0.66–1.10), 0.87 (0.82–0.92), 0.87 (0.76–0.98), and 1.22 (1.10–1.36) for rosuvastatin, atorvastatin, pravastatin, and lovastatin, respectively. Conclusion Statin use was associated with lower mortality in patients hospitalized with sepsis. Hydrophilic and synthetic statins were associated with better outcomes than lipophilic and fungal-based preparations.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Critical Care Research and Practice
Critical Care Research and Practice CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
34
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊最新文献
Assessment of Satisfaction Levels Among Families of Intensive Care Unit Patients in Saudi Arabia: A Cross-Sectional Study. Serum Concentration at 24 h With Intensive Beta-Lactam Therapy in Sepsis and Septic Shock: A Prospective Study: Beta-Lactam Blood Levels in Sepsis. Assessing the Impact of Simulation-Based Learning on Student Satisfaction and Self-Confidence in Critical Care Medicine. A Comparison of the Outcomes of COVID-19 Vaccinated and Nonvaccinated Patients Admitted to an Intensive Care Unit in a Low-Middle-Income Country. Dyschloremia and Renal Outcomes in Critically Ill Patients With Sepsis: A Prospective Cohort Study: Dyschloremia and Renal Outcomes in Sepsis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1