印度奥迪沙农村农户的家庭花园、家庭营养和收入

IF 3.4 2区 经济学 Q1 AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY Journal of Agricultural Economics Pub Date : 2023-02-07 DOI:10.1111/1477-9552.12525
Sylvester O. Ogutu, Jonathan Mockshell, James Garrett, Ricardo Labarta, Thea Ritter, Edward Martey, Nedumaran Swamikannu, Elisabetta Gotor, Carolina Gonzalez
{"title":"印度奥迪沙农村农户的家庭花园、家庭营养和收入","authors":"Sylvester O. Ogutu,&nbsp;Jonathan Mockshell,&nbsp;James Garrett,&nbsp;Ricardo Labarta,&nbsp;Thea Ritter,&nbsp;Edward Martey,&nbsp;Nedumaran Swamikannu,&nbsp;Elisabetta Gotor,&nbsp;Carolina Gonzalez","doi":"10.1111/1477-9552.12525","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Home gardens have been an integral part of the recent food-based interventions aimed at stimulating changes in dietary patterns and improving nutrition. However, evidence of their effects on food security, dietary quality, child anthropometry and incomes is limited, particularly among vulnerable populations groups. Using panel data from a sample of approximately 1900 households from vulnerable population groups in Odisha, India, difference-in-differences and other econometric techniques, we analyse the effects of home gardens on food security, dietary quality, child anthropometry and income. On average, home gardens contribute to better household food security, higher dietary quality of men and women but do not contribute to higher children's dietary quality and anthropometry. Also, home gardens increase monthly per adult equivalent incomes by 37% and reduce the prevalence of poverty by 11.7 percentage points. Quantile regression results suggest that home gardens enhance food security and incomes in all quantiles, but richer farmers benefit more than poorer farmers. Overall, home gardens can enhance household food security, dietary quality of men and women, and income gains among vulnerable farming population groups, but they may not suffice to improve child dietary quality and anthropometry.</p>","PeriodicalId":14994,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Agricultural Economics","volume":"74 3","pages":"744-763"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1477-9552.12525","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Home gardens, household nutrition and income in rural farm households in Odisha, India\",\"authors\":\"Sylvester O. Ogutu,&nbsp;Jonathan Mockshell,&nbsp;James Garrett,&nbsp;Ricardo Labarta,&nbsp;Thea Ritter,&nbsp;Edward Martey,&nbsp;Nedumaran Swamikannu,&nbsp;Elisabetta Gotor,&nbsp;Carolina Gonzalez\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/1477-9552.12525\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Home gardens have been an integral part of the recent food-based interventions aimed at stimulating changes in dietary patterns and improving nutrition. However, evidence of their effects on food security, dietary quality, child anthropometry and incomes is limited, particularly among vulnerable populations groups. Using panel data from a sample of approximately 1900 households from vulnerable population groups in Odisha, India, difference-in-differences and other econometric techniques, we analyse the effects of home gardens on food security, dietary quality, child anthropometry and income. On average, home gardens contribute to better household food security, higher dietary quality of men and women but do not contribute to higher children's dietary quality and anthropometry. Also, home gardens increase monthly per adult equivalent incomes by 37% and reduce the prevalence of poverty by 11.7 percentage points. Quantile regression results suggest that home gardens enhance food security and incomes in all quantiles, but richer farmers benefit more than poorer farmers. Overall, home gardens can enhance household food security, dietary quality of men and women, and income gains among vulnerable farming population groups, but they may not suffice to improve child dietary quality and anthropometry.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14994,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Agricultural Economics\",\"volume\":\"74 3\",\"pages\":\"744-763\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1477-9552.12525\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Agricultural Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1477-9552.12525\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Agricultural Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1477-9552.12525","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

家庭菜园是最近以食物为基础的干预措施的一个组成部分,旨在刺激饮食模式的变化和改善营养。然而,关于它们对粮食安全、饮食质量、儿童人体测量和收入的影响的证据有限,特别是在弱势群体中。利用来自印度奥里萨邦弱势群体的约1900户家庭样本的面板数据,采用差异中的差异和其他计量经济学技术,我们分析了家庭菜园对粮食安全、饮食质量、儿童人体测量和收入的影响。平均而言,家庭菜园有助于改善家庭粮食安全,提高男性和女性的饮食质量,但无助于提高儿童的饮食质量和人体测量。此外,家庭菜园使每个成年人的月平均收入增加了37%,贫困率降低了11.7个百分点。分位数回归结果表明,家庭菜园提高了所有分位数的粮食安全和收入,但富裕的农民比贫穷的农民受益更多。总体而言,家庭菜园可以提高家庭粮食安全、男女饮食质量和弱势农业人口的收入,但它们可能不足以改善儿童的饮食质量和人体测量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Home gardens, household nutrition and income in rural farm households in Odisha, India

Home gardens have been an integral part of the recent food-based interventions aimed at stimulating changes in dietary patterns and improving nutrition. However, evidence of their effects on food security, dietary quality, child anthropometry and incomes is limited, particularly among vulnerable populations groups. Using panel data from a sample of approximately 1900 households from vulnerable population groups in Odisha, India, difference-in-differences and other econometric techniques, we analyse the effects of home gardens on food security, dietary quality, child anthropometry and income. On average, home gardens contribute to better household food security, higher dietary quality of men and women but do not contribute to higher children's dietary quality and anthropometry. Also, home gardens increase monthly per adult equivalent incomes by 37% and reduce the prevalence of poverty by 11.7 percentage points. Quantile regression results suggest that home gardens enhance food security and incomes in all quantiles, but richer farmers benefit more than poorer farmers. Overall, home gardens can enhance household food security, dietary quality of men and women, and income gains among vulnerable farming population groups, but they may not suffice to improve child dietary quality and anthropometry.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Agricultural Economics
Journal of Agricultural Economics 管理科学-农业经济与政策
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
2.90%
发文量
48
审稿时长
>24 weeks
期刊介绍: Published on behalf of the Agricultural Economics Society, the Journal of Agricultural Economics is a leading international professional journal, providing a forum for research into agricultural economics and related disciplines such as statistics, marketing, business management, politics, history and sociology, and their application to issues in the agricultural, food, and related industries; rural communities, and the environment. Each issue of the JAE contains articles, notes and book reviews as well as information relating to the Agricultural Economics Society. Published 3 times a year, it is received by members and institutional subscribers in 69 countries. With contributions from leading international scholars, the JAE is a leading citation for agricultural economics and policy. Published articles either deal with new developments in research and methods of analysis, or apply existing methods and techniques to new problems and situations which are of general interest to the Journal’s international readership.
期刊最新文献
Technical and environmental inefficiency measurement in agriculture using a flexible by‐production stochastic frontier model The economic potential for area‐yield crop insurance: An application to maize in Ghana Commercialisation, exogenous shocks and nutrition: Evidence from smallholder farmers in Bangladesh Adoption of agronomic practices and their impact on crop yield and income: An analysis for black gram and green gram in India From informal farmland rental to market‐oriented transactions: Do China's Land Transfer Service Centers help?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1