{"title":"评估工作记忆的特定语言非词语:与双语儿童打交道","authors":"E. Zaretsky, Benjamin P. Lange","doi":"10.1177/15257401221113064","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Bilingual children with a limited command of the second language (L2) often yield unsatisfactory results in L2-based non-word repetition tasks (NWRT) for the assessment of working memory. In this study, monolinguals (MO) and bilinguals (BI) of preschool age acquiring German were compared in regard to their performance on German-based NWRT to choose test items that do not put BI at a disadvantage. Four-year-old children (N = 876) were tested with the German language screenings Sprachscreening für das Vorschulalter (SSV) and Kindersprachscreening (KiSS), including 38 non-words. BI scored significantly lower in NWRT than MO due to a limited command of German as well as a limited language input (e.g., length of kindergarten attendance). After the statistical deletion of children who did not speak German age-appropriately, BI outperformed MO on the SSV, without significant differences on the KiSS. Performance on NWRT depended on the children’s command of the German vocabulary and phonotactics. Several relatively “culture-fair” NWRT items were identified.","PeriodicalId":46403,"journal":{"name":"Communication Disorders Quarterly","volume":"44 1","pages":"219 - 227"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Language-Specific Non-Words for the Assessment of Working Memory: Dealing With Bilingual Children\",\"authors\":\"E. Zaretsky, Benjamin P. Lange\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/15257401221113064\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Bilingual children with a limited command of the second language (L2) often yield unsatisfactory results in L2-based non-word repetition tasks (NWRT) for the assessment of working memory. In this study, monolinguals (MO) and bilinguals (BI) of preschool age acquiring German were compared in regard to their performance on German-based NWRT to choose test items that do not put BI at a disadvantage. Four-year-old children (N = 876) were tested with the German language screenings Sprachscreening für das Vorschulalter (SSV) and Kindersprachscreening (KiSS), including 38 non-words. BI scored significantly lower in NWRT than MO due to a limited command of German as well as a limited language input (e.g., length of kindergarten attendance). After the statistical deletion of children who did not speak German age-appropriately, BI outperformed MO on the SSV, without significant differences on the KiSS. Performance on NWRT depended on the children’s command of the German vocabulary and phonotactics. Several relatively “culture-fair” NWRT items were identified.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46403,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Communication Disorders Quarterly\",\"volume\":\"44 1\",\"pages\":\"219 - 227\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Communication Disorders Quarterly\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/15257401221113064\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Communication Disorders Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15257401221113064","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
第二语言能力有限的双语儿童在基于第二语言的非单词重复任务(NWRT)中评估工作记忆的结果往往不令人满意。在这项研究中,对学龄前学习德语的单语者(MO)和双语者(BI)在基于德语的NWRT中的表现进行了比较,以选择不会使BI处于不利地位的测试项目。4岁儿童(N=876)接受了德语筛查Sprachscreening für das Vorschulalter(SSV)和Kindersprachscreening(KiSS),包括38个非单词。由于德语掌握能力有限以及语言输入有限(如幼儿园出勤时间),BI在NWRT中的得分明显低于MO。在对年龄不适合说德语的儿童进行统计删除后,BI在SSV方面优于MO,在KiSS方面没有显著差异。NWRT的表现取决于孩子们对德语词汇和发音策略的掌握。确定了几个相对“文化博览会”的NWRT项目。
Language-Specific Non-Words for the Assessment of Working Memory: Dealing With Bilingual Children
Bilingual children with a limited command of the second language (L2) often yield unsatisfactory results in L2-based non-word repetition tasks (NWRT) for the assessment of working memory. In this study, monolinguals (MO) and bilinguals (BI) of preschool age acquiring German were compared in regard to their performance on German-based NWRT to choose test items that do not put BI at a disadvantage. Four-year-old children (N = 876) were tested with the German language screenings Sprachscreening für das Vorschulalter (SSV) and Kindersprachscreening (KiSS), including 38 non-words. BI scored significantly lower in NWRT than MO due to a limited command of German as well as a limited language input (e.g., length of kindergarten attendance). After the statistical deletion of children who did not speak German age-appropriately, BI outperformed MO on the SSV, without significant differences on the KiSS. Performance on NWRT depended on the children’s command of the German vocabulary and phonotactics. Several relatively “culture-fair” NWRT items were identified.
期刊介绍:
Articles for Communication Disorders Quarterly (CDQ) are accepted for review on a continual basis. The editor of CDQ welcomes submissions of previously unpublished applied and clinical research relating to typical and atypical communication across the lifespan. This includes assessment of and interventions for communicative disorders in infants, toddlers, young children, school-age children, youth, and adults. The readers of CDQ represent a breadth of viewpoints and professional interests, which is also reflected in the diversity of interests and expertise of the editorial board members. The journal is particularly of interest to speech–language pathologists and teachers of the deaf and hard of hearing. CDQ uses a masked peer review process for submissions.