影响根尖切除牙远期预后的因素

A. Sakkas, K. Winter, M. Rath, F. Mascha, S. Pietzka, A. Schramm, F. Wilde
{"title":"影响根尖切除牙远期预后的因素","authors":"A. Sakkas, K. Winter, M. Rath, F. Mascha, S. Pietzka, A. Schramm, F. Wilde","doi":"10.3205/iprs000139","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: The aim of the study was to investigate possible predictive factors influencing the long-term success of root tip resection. Methods: The retrospective study included 216 patients (♂ 111, ♀ 106, median age 43.3 years). A total of 261 root tip resections were performed on these patients between 1989 and 2012. In addition to determining the success rates 5 and 10 years postoperatively, the factors gender, age, tooth type, use of bone replacement material and preoperative periodontal tooth status were examined with regard to their significance for the long-term prognosis of root tip resected teeth. Results: The evaluation showed an average success rate of 63.6% for all included teeth over the entire observation period (tooth at least one year postoperatively still in situ). The 5-year success rate was 78.2%, the 10-year success rate 63.1%. A dependence of the success rates on the tooth type could not be evaluated. However, the examination showed a clear dependence of the success on the age of the patients. Root tip resections in patients in the age group 60 years and older had significantly worse success rates compared to the age groups 20 to 39 years and 40 to 59 years. The prognosis was also significantly better for patients in the age group 20 to 39 years than for patients in the age group 40 to 59 years. Periodontally compromised teeth showed only a tendency for a poorer prognosis than periodontally healthy teeth. With regard to sex and intraoperative filling of the resection defect with bone replacement material, no differences in the success rates were found. Conclusions: A root tip resection is a good option, largely independent of the type of tooth, to preserve a tooth in the medium to long term after unsuccessful endodontic treatment. However, a revision of the endodontic treatment or even an extraction with subsequent implantation should always be considered as an alternative, especially with increasing age.","PeriodicalId":43347,"journal":{"name":"GMS Interdisciplinary Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery DGPW","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Factors influencing the long-term prognosis of root tip resected teeth\",\"authors\":\"A. Sakkas, K. Winter, M. Rath, F. Mascha, S. Pietzka, A. Schramm, F. Wilde\",\"doi\":\"10.3205/iprs000139\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: The aim of the study was to investigate possible predictive factors influencing the long-term success of root tip resection. Methods: The retrospective study included 216 patients (♂ 111, ♀ 106, median age 43.3 years). A total of 261 root tip resections were performed on these patients between 1989 and 2012. In addition to determining the success rates 5 and 10 years postoperatively, the factors gender, age, tooth type, use of bone replacement material and preoperative periodontal tooth status were examined with regard to their significance for the long-term prognosis of root tip resected teeth. Results: The evaluation showed an average success rate of 63.6% for all included teeth over the entire observation period (tooth at least one year postoperatively still in situ). The 5-year success rate was 78.2%, the 10-year success rate 63.1%. A dependence of the success rates on the tooth type could not be evaluated. However, the examination showed a clear dependence of the success on the age of the patients. Root tip resections in patients in the age group 60 years and older had significantly worse success rates compared to the age groups 20 to 39 years and 40 to 59 years. The prognosis was also significantly better for patients in the age group 20 to 39 years than for patients in the age group 40 to 59 years. Periodontally compromised teeth showed only a tendency for a poorer prognosis than periodontally healthy teeth. With regard to sex and intraoperative filling of the resection defect with bone replacement material, no differences in the success rates were found. Conclusions: A root tip resection is a good option, largely independent of the type of tooth, to preserve a tooth in the medium to long term after unsuccessful endodontic treatment. However, a revision of the endodontic treatment or even an extraction with subsequent implantation should always be considered as an alternative, especially with increasing age.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43347,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"GMS Interdisciplinary Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery DGPW\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-09-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"GMS Interdisciplinary Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery DGPW\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3205/iprs000139\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"GMS Interdisciplinary Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery DGPW","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3205/iprs000139","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

引言:本研究的目的是探讨影响根尖切除术长期成功的可能预测因素。方法:回顾性研究包括216例患者(♂ 111,♀ 中位年龄43.3岁)。1989年至2012年间,共对这些患者进行了261次根尖切除术。除了确定术后5年和10年的成功率外,还检查了性别、年龄、牙齿类型、骨替代材料的使用和术前牙周状况等因素对根尖切除牙齿长期预后的意义。结果:评估显示,在整个观察期内,所有纳入的牙齿的平均成功率为63.6%(术后至少一年牙齿仍在原位)。5年成功率78.2%,10年成功率63.1%。无法评估成功率对牙齿类型的依赖性。然而,检查显示,成功与否明显取决于患者的年龄。与20至39岁和40至59岁年龄组相比,60岁及以上年龄组患者的根尖切除成功率明显较差。20至39岁年龄组患者的预后也明显好于40至59岁年龄组的患者。牙周受损的牙齿只显示出比牙周健康的牙齿预后较差的趋势。在性别和术中用骨替代材料填充切除缺损方面,没有发现成功率的差异。结论:根尖切除术是一种很好的选择,在很大程度上与牙齿类型无关,可以在牙髓治疗失败后中长期保存牙齿。然而,应始终考虑对牙髓治疗进行翻修,甚至在随后植入的情况下进行拔除,尤其是随着年龄的增长。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Factors influencing the long-term prognosis of root tip resected teeth
Introduction: The aim of the study was to investigate possible predictive factors influencing the long-term success of root tip resection. Methods: The retrospective study included 216 patients (♂ 111, ♀ 106, median age 43.3 years). A total of 261 root tip resections were performed on these patients between 1989 and 2012. In addition to determining the success rates 5 and 10 years postoperatively, the factors gender, age, tooth type, use of bone replacement material and preoperative periodontal tooth status were examined with regard to their significance for the long-term prognosis of root tip resected teeth. Results: The evaluation showed an average success rate of 63.6% for all included teeth over the entire observation period (tooth at least one year postoperatively still in situ). The 5-year success rate was 78.2%, the 10-year success rate 63.1%. A dependence of the success rates on the tooth type could not be evaluated. However, the examination showed a clear dependence of the success on the age of the patients. Root tip resections in patients in the age group 60 years and older had significantly worse success rates compared to the age groups 20 to 39 years and 40 to 59 years. The prognosis was also significantly better for patients in the age group 20 to 39 years than for patients in the age group 40 to 59 years. Periodontally compromised teeth showed only a tendency for a poorer prognosis than periodontally healthy teeth. With regard to sex and intraoperative filling of the resection defect with bone replacement material, no differences in the success rates were found. Conclusions: A root tip resection is a good option, largely independent of the type of tooth, to preserve a tooth in the medium to long term after unsuccessful endodontic treatment. However, a revision of the endodontic treatment or even an extraction with subsequent implantation should always be considered as an alternative, especially with increasing age.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊最新文献
Scalp reconstruction with locoregional and free flaps - a retrospective cohort study. Results of a patient survey using an online questionnaire after implant removal for breast implant illness. Acral melanoma of the heel mimicking a pressure sore. Intramedullary arthrodesis of the knee joint with additional femoral neck screw to prevent periprosthetic fracture of the proximal femur. A case report. Subtotal diaphyseal replacement of the femur with modular mega-endoprosthesis following interprosthetic fracture. A case report.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1