{"title":"战后制作:狄金森、编辑理论和水牛诗学计划","authors":"George Life","doi":"10.1353/EDJ.2018.0008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:This essay takes the recent conference at the University at Buffalo marking the twenty-fifth anniversary of the Buffalo Poetics Program as an occasion for rethinking the ways in which we read Dickinson as responsive to culture, politics, and history. To prompt this rethinking this essay moves through three interrelated sections. The first provides an account of the Poetics Program as a center for editorial theory regarding Dickinson; the second offers a comparison of what I argue are the two primary editorial representations of Dickinson's work now available, namely Marta Werner and Jen Bervin's The Gorgeous Nothings and Cristanne Miller's Emily Dickinson's Poems: As She Preserved Them, both intimately associated with the program; and the third, considering Werner and Bervin's edition in light of Miller's, calls for greater critical attention to traces of cultural, political, and historical responsiveness in Dickinson's later poems, which I propose can be understood as postbellum productions.","PeriodicalId":41721,"journal":{"name":"Emily Dickinson Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1353/EDJ.2018.0008","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Postbellum Productions: Dickinson, Editorial Theory, and the Buffalo Poetics Program\",\"authors\":\"George Life\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/EDJ.2018.0008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract:This essay takes the recent conference at the University at Buffalo marking the twenty-fifth anniversary of the Buffalo Poetics Program as an occasion for rethinking the ways in which we read Dickinson as responsive to culture, politics, and history. To prompt this rethinking this essay moves through three interrelated sections. The first provides an account of the Poetics Program as a center for editorial theory regarding Dickinson; the second offers a comparison of what I argue are the two primary editorial representations of Dickinson's work now available, namely Marta Werner and Jen Bervin's The Gorgeous Nothings and Cristanne Miller's Emily Dickinson's Poems: As She Preserved Them, both intimately associated with the program; and the third, considering Werner and Bervin's edition in light of Miller's, calls for greater critical attention to traces of cultural, political, and historical responsiveness in Dickinson's later poems, which I propose can be understood as postbellum productions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41721,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Emily Dickinson Journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-01-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1353/EDJ.2018.0008\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Emily Dickinson Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/EDJ.2018.0008\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LITERATURE, AMERICAN\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Emily Dickinson Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/EDJ.2018.0008","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE, AMERICAN","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
摘要:这篇文章以最近在布法罗大学举行的纪念布法罗诗学项目二十五周年的会议为契机,重新思考我们解读狄金森对文化、政治和历史的反应。为了促进这种反思,本文分三个相关的部分。第一部分介绍了作为狄金森编辑理论中心的诗学计划;第二部分比较了我认为目前对狄金森作品的两种主要编辑表述,即Marta Werner和Jen Bervin的《华丽的Nothings》和Cristanne Miller的《Emily Dickinson的诗:As She Preserved Them》,两者都与该节目密切相关;第三,根据米勒的版本,考虑到沃纳和贝文的版本,呼吁对狄金森后期诗歌中文化、政治和历史反应的痕迹给予更多的批判性关注,我认为这可以被理解为细胞后的作品。
Postbellum Productions: Dickinson, Editorial Theory, and the Buffalo Poetics Program
Abstract:This essay takes the recent conference at the University at Buffalo marking the twenty-fifth anniversary of the Buffalo Poetics Program as an occasion for rethinking the ways in which we read Dickinson as responsive to culture, politics, and history. To prompt this rethinking this essay moves through three interrelated sections. The first provides an account of the Poetics Program as a center for editorial theory regarding Dickinson; the second offers a comparison of what I argue are the two primary editorial representations of Dickinson's work now available, namely Marta Werner and Jen Bervin's The Gorgeous Nothings and Cristanne Miller's Emily Dickinson's Poems: As She Preserved Them, both intimately associated with the program; and the third, considering Werner and Bervin's edition in light of Miller's, calls for greater critical attention to traces of cultural, political, and historical responsiveness in Dickinson's later poems, which I propose can be understood as postbellum productions.
期刊介绍:
The Emily Dickinson Journal (EDJ) showcases the poet at the center of current critical practices and perspectives. EDJ features writing by talented young scholars as well as work by those established in the field. Contributors explore the many ways in which Dickinson illuminates and challenges. No other journal provides this quality or quantity of scholarship on Dickinson. The Emily Dickinson Journal is sponsored by the Emily Dickinson International Society (EDIS).