估算新西兰林业和农业的年度投资回报

IF 0.7 4区 农林科学 Q3 ECONOMICS Journal of Forest Economics Pub Date : 2018-12-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jfe.2018.06.001
David C. Evison
{"title":"估算新西兰林业和农业的年度投资回报","authors":"David C. Evison","doi":"10.1016/j.jfe.2018.06.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This paper describes a method of estimating annual investment returns from forest growing businesses in New Zealand, using financial statement data. The method is also applied to survey data (derived from farm financial statements) published by New Zealand pastoral farming sector organisations. After data are adjusted for inflation<span>, the total investment return is calculated as the sum of the cash return on assets, and the percentage change in asset value. The paper demonstrates that the total investment return calculated in this way is equivalent to the internal rate of return (IRR), for a single period of one year. The direct equivalence between this measure and the single-period IRR (calculated using discounted cash-flow analysis) is demonstrated algebraically and by example.</span></p><p>Calculated values for forestry<span> show a wide range of investment returns for different businesses in any one year, although there has been a general trend for total returns to increase for forestry businesses since about 2008. Investment returns for dairy and sheep and beef generally follow similar trends, with dairy providing a higher return on average than sheep and beef over the period studied. The data for forestry and agriculture are not directly comparable, since the forestry data are extracted directly from the financial statements of individual businesses and the farming data are derived through a process of averaging financial returns from a large number of farms, with the objective of providing typical returns for benchmarking. The scale of the operations are also significantly different, with the benchmark dairy farm being 148 ha, the sheep farm 764 ha and the forest businesses ranging from 21,000 ha to 150,000 ha (most recent year in all cases).</span></p><p>The measure of total return used in this paper is attractive because it means the same measure can be used for evaluating existing businesses as would have been used to justify the initial set up of the business, or any projects that contributed to the business along the way. This provides a measure for <em>ex post</em> evaluation of existing investments that is consistent with one of the <em>ex-ante</em><span> decision criteria used at the time investment decisions are made. The method also provides separate estimates of the income or productive return, and the (usually) unrealised change in asset value. The paper demonstrates that the method can be applied to either individual company or industry average financial data equally easily. This method provides a viable alternative to using survey data to estimate annual investment returns.</span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":54831,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Forest Economics","volume":"33 ","pages":"Pages 105-111"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.jfe.2018.06.001","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Estimating annual investment returns from forestry and agriculture in New Zealand\",\"authors\":\"David C. Evison\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jfe.2018.06.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This paper describes a method of estimating annual investment returns from forest growing businesses in New Zealand, using financial statement data. The method is also applied to survey data (derived from farm financial statements) published by New Zealand pastoral farming sector organisations. After data are adjusted for inflation<span>, the total investment return is calculated as the sum of the cash return on assets, and the percentage change in asset value. The paper demonstrates that the total investment return calculated in this way is equivalent to the internal rate of return (IRR), for a single period of one year. The direct equivalence between this measure and the single-period IRR (calculated using discounted cash-flow analysis) is demonstrated algebraically and by example.</span></p><p>Calculated values for forestry<span> show a wide range of investment returns for different businesses in any one year, although there has been a general trend for total returns to increase for forestry businesses since about 2008. Investment returns for dairy and sheep and beef generally follow similar trends, with dairy providing a higher return on average than sheep and beef over the period studied. The data for forestry and agriculture are not directly comparable, since the forestry data are extracted directly from the financial statements of individual businesses and the farming data are derived through a process of averaging financial returns from a large number of farms, with the objective of providing typical returns for benchmarking. The scale of the operations are also significantly different, with the benchmark dairy farm being 148 ha, the sheep farm 764 ha and the forest businesses ranging from 21,000 ha to 150,000 ha (most recent year in all cases).</span></p><p>The measure of total return used in this paper is attractive because it means the same measure can be used for evaluating existing businesses as would have been used to justify the initial set up of the business, or any projects that contributed to the business along the way. This provides a measure for <em>ex post</em> evaluation of existing investments that is consistent with one of the <em>ex-ante</em><span> decision criteria used at the time investment decisions are made. The method also provides separate estimates of the income or productive return, and the (usually) unrealised change in asset value. The paper demonstrates that the method can be applied to either individual company or industry average financial data equally easily. This method provides a viable alternative to using survey data to estimate annual investment returns.</span></p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54831,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Forest Economics\",\"volume\":\"33 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 105-111\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.jfe.2018.06.001\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Forest Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1104689917300338\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Forest Economics","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1104689917300338","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

本文描述了一种估算新西兰森林种植企业年度投资回报的方法,使用财务报表数据。该方法也适用于调查数据(来自农场财务报表)由新西兰畜牧农业部门组织公布。根据通货膨胀调整数据后,总投资收益计算为资产的现金收益与资产价值变化百分比的总和。本文证明,以这种方法计算的总投资收益相当于一年期的内部收益率(IRR)。该指标与单期内部收益率(使用贴现现金流分析计算)之间的直接等价性通过代数和实例证明。林业的计算值显示,在任何一年中,不同业务的投资回报范围很大,尽管大约自2008年以来,林业业务的总回报有增加的总体趋势。乳制品、羊和牛肉的投资回报通常遵循类似的趋势,在研究期间,乳制品的平均回报高于羊和牛肉。林业和农业的数据不能直接进行比较,因为林业数据是直接从单个企业的财务报表中提取的,而农业数据是通过对大量农场的财务回报进行平均得出的,目的是为基准提供典型回报。经营规模也有很大不同,基准奶牛场为148 公顷,绵羊场为764 公顷,森林业务从21,000 公顷到150,000 公顷不等(所有情况都是最近一年)。本文中使用的总回报度量是有吸引力的,因为它意味着可以使用相同的度量来评估现有的业务,就像用来证明业务的初始设置一样,或者在此过程中对业务做出贡献的任何项目。这为现有投资的事后评价提供了一种方法,这种方法与作出投资决策时使用的事前决策标准之一是一致的。该方法还提供了收入或生产回报的单独估计,以及(通常)未实现的资产价值变化。本文表明,该方法既可以适用于单个公司财务数据,也可以适用于行业平均财务数据。这种方法为使用调查数据估计年度投资回报提供了一种可行的替代方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Estimating annual investment returns from forestry and agriculture in New Zealand

This paper describes a method of estimating annual investment returns from forest growing businesses in New Zealand, using financial statement data. The method is also applied to survey data (derived from farm financial statements) published by New Zealand pastoral farming sector organisations. After data are adjusted for inflation, the total investment return is calculated as the sum of the cash return on assets, and the percentage change in asset value. The paper demonstrates that the total investment return calculated in this way is equivalent to the internal rate of return (IRR), for a single period of one year. The direct equivalence between this measure and the single-period IRR (calculated using discounted cash-flow analysis) is demonstrated algebraically and by example.

Calculated values for forestry show a wide range of investment returns for different businesses in any one year, although there has been a general trend for total returns to increase for forestry businesses since about 2008. Investment returns for dairy and sheep and beef generally follow similar trends, with dairy providing a higher return on average than sheep and beef over the period studied. The data for forestry and agriculture are not directly comparable, since the forestry data are extracted directly from the financial statements of individual businesses and the farming data are derived through a process of averaging financial returns from a large number of farms, with the objective of providing typical returns for benchmarking. The scale of the operations are also significantly different, with the benchmark dairy farm being 148 ha, the sheep farm 764 ha and the forest businesses ranging from 21,000 ha to 150,000 ha (most recent year in all cases).

The measure of total return used in this paper is attractive because it means the same measure can be used for evaluating existing businesses as would have been used to justify the initial set up of the business, or any projects that contributed to the business along the way. This provides a measure for ex post evaluation of existing investments that is consistent with one of the ex-ante decision criteria used at the time investment decisions are made. The method also provides separate estimates of the income or productive return, and the (usually) unrealised change in asset value. The paper demonstrates that the method can be applied to either individual company or industry average financial data equally easily. This method provides a viable alternative to using survey data to estimate annual investment returns.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Forest Economics
Journal of Forest Economics 农林科学-林学
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
审稿时长
>36 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal covers all aspects of forest economics, and publishes scientific papers in subject areas such as the following: forest management problems: economics of silviculture, forest regulation and operational activities, managerial economics; forest industry analysis: economics of processing, industrial organization problems, demand and supply analysis, technological change, international trade of forest products; multiple use of forests: valuation of non-market priced goods and services, cost-benefit analysis of environment and timber production, external effects of forestry and forest industry; forest policy analysis: market and intervention failures, regulation of forest management, ownership, taxation; land use and economic development: deforestation and land use problem, national resource accounting, contribution to national and regional income and employment. forestry and climate change: using forestry to mitigate climate change, economic analysis of bioenergy, adaption of forestry to climate change.
期刊最新文献
Wildfires and Wind Turbine Plants: A Story Never Told The Impact of Forest Policy Modernization in British Columbia: A Stock Market Perspective Feasibility of Landscape Value Trade between Landowners and Citizens in Reducing the Landscape Damage Caused by Wind Power Impacts of Long-term Strategies for the Swedish Forest Sector: Analyses with the BioFrame Integrated Modelling Framework Climate Change and Wood Production
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1