哈勃常数

IF 26.3 2区 物理与天体物理 Q1 PHYSICS, PARTICLES & FIELDS Living Reviews in Relativity Pub Date : 2015-09-24 DOI:10.1007/lrr-2015-2
Neal Jackson
{"title":"哈勃常数","authors":"Neal Jackson","doi":"10.1007/lrr-2015-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>I review the current state of determinations of the Hubble constant, which gives the length scale of the Universe by relating the expansion velocity of objects to their distance. There are two broad categories of measurements. The first uses individual astrophysical objects which have some property that allows their intrinsic luminosity or size to be determined, or allows the determination of their distance by geometric means. The second category comprises the use of all-sky cosmic microwave background, or correlations between large samples of galaxies, to determine information about the geometry of the Universe and hence the Hubble constant, typically in a combination with other cosmological parameters. Many, but not all, object-based measurements give <i>H</i><sub>0</sub> values of around 72–74 km s<sup>?1</sup> Mpc<sup>?1</sup>, with typical errors of 2–3 km s<sup>?1</sup> Mpc<sup>?1</sup>. This is in mild discrepancy with CMB-based measurements, in particular those from the <i>Planck</i> satellite, which give values of 67–68 km s<sup>?1</sup> Mpc<sup>?1</sup> and typical errors of 1–2 km s<sup>?1</sup> Mpc<sup>?1</sup>. The size of the remaining systematics indicate that accuracy rather than precision is the remaining problem in a good determination of the Hubble constant. Whether a discrepancy exists, and whether new physics is needed to resolve it, depends on details of the systematics of the object-based methods, and also on the assumptions about other cosmological parameters and which datasets are combined in the case of the all-sky methods.</p>","PeriodicalId":686,"journal":{"name":"Living Reviews in Relativity","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":26.3000,"publicationDate":"2015-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/lrr-2015-2","citationCount":"23","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Hubble Constant\",\"authors\":\"Neal Jackson\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/lrr-2015-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>I review the current state of determinations of the Hubble constant, which gives the length scale of the Universe by relating the expansion velocity of objects to their distance. There are two broad categories of measurements. The first uses individual astrophysical objects which have some property that allows their intrinsic luminosity or size to be determined, or allows the determination of their distance by geometric means. The second category comprises the use of all-sky cosmic microwave background, or correlations between large samples of galaxies, to determine information about the geometry of the Universe and hence the Hubble constant, typically in a combination with other cosmological parameters. Many, but not all, object-based measurements give <i>H</i><sub>0</sub> values of around 72–74 km s<sup>?1</sup> Mpc<sup>?1</sup>, with typical errors of 2–3 km s<sup>?1</sup> Mpc<sup>?1</sup>. This is in mild discrepancy with CMB-based measurements, in particular those from the <i>Planck</i> satellite, which give values of 67–68 km s<sup>?1</sup> Mpc<sup>?1</sup> and typical errors of 1–2 km s<sup>?1</sup> Mpc<sup>?1</sup>. The size of the remaining systematics indicate that accuracy rather than precision is the remaining problem in a good determination of the Hubble constant. Whether a discrepancy exists, and whether new physics is needed to resolve it, depends on details of the systematics of the object-based methods, and also on the assumptions about other cosmological parameters and which datasets are combined in the case of the all-sky methods.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":686,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Living Reviews in Relativity\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":26.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-09-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/lrr-2015-2\",\"citationCount\":\"23\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Living Reviews in Relativity\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"101\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/lrr-2015-2\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"物理与天体物理\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PHYSICS, PARTICLES & FIELDS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Living Reviews in Relativity","FirstCategoryId":"101","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/lrr-2015-2","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PHYSICS, PARTICLES & FIELDS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 23

摘要

我将回顾哈勃常数的测定现状,该常数通过将物体的膨胀速度与其距离联系起来,给出了宇宙的长度尺度。测量有两大类。第一种方法使用单个天体物理对象,这些对象具有某些特性,可以确定其固有亮度或大小,或者可以通过几何方法确定其距离。第二类包括利用全天空宇宙微波背景,或大型星系样本之间的相关性,来确定有关宇宙几何形状的信息,从而确定哈勃常数,通常与其他宇宙学参数相结合。许多(但不是全部)基于物体的测量给出的H0值约为72-74 km / s。1 Mpc ?1、典型误差2-3 km s?1 Mpc ? 1。这与基于宇宙微波背景辐射的测量结果存在轻微差异,特别是来自普朗克卫星的测量结果,后者给出的值为67-68 km / s?1 Mpc ?典型误差为1 - 2 km s?1 Mpc ? 1。剩余的系统数据的大小表明,准确而不是精确是确定哈勃常数的剩余问题。是否存在差异,是否需要新的物理学来解决它,取决于基于物体的方法的系统细节,也取决于对其他宇宙学参数的假设,以及在全天空方法的情况下,哪些数据集被组合在一起。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Hubble Constant

I review the current state of determinations of the Hubble constant, which gives the length scale of the Universe by relating the expansion velocity of objects to their distance. There are two broad categories of measurements. The first uses individual astrophysical objects which have some property that allows their intrinsic luminosity or size to be determined, or allows the determination of their distance by geometric means. The second category comprises the use of all-sky cosmic microwave background, or correlations between large samples of galaxies, to determine information about the geometry of the Universe and hence the Hubble constant, typically in a combination with other cosmological parameters. Many, but not all, object-based measurements give H0 values of around 72–74 km s?1 Mpc?1, with typical errors of 2–3 km s?1 Mpc?1. This is in mild discrepancy with CMB-based measurements, in particular those from the Planck satellite, which give values of 67–68 km s?1 Mpc?1 and typical errors of 1–2 km s?1 Mpc?1. The size of the remaining systematics indicate that accuracy rather than precision is the remaining problem in a good determination of the Hubble constant. Whether a discrepancy exists, and whether new physics is needed to resolve it, depends on details of the systematics of the object-based methods, and also on the assumptions about other cosmological parameters and which datasets are combined in the case of the all-sky methods.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Living Reviews in Relativity
Living Reviews in Relativity 物理-物理:粒子与场物理
CiteScore
69.90
自引率
0.70%
发文量
0
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: Living Reviews in Relativity is a peer-reviewed, platinum open-access journal that publishes reviews of research across all areas of relativity. Directed towards the scientific community at or above the graduate-student level, articles are solicited from leading authorities and provide critical assessments of current research. They offer annotated insights into key literature and describe available resources, maintaining an up-to-date suite of high-quality reviews, thus embodying the "living" aspect of the journal's title. Serving as a valuable tool for the scientific community, Living Reviews in Relativity is often the first stop for researchers seeking information on current work in relativity. Written by experts, the reviews cite, explain, and assess the most relevant resources in a given field, evaluating existing work and suggesting areas for further research. Attracting readers from the entire relativity community, the journal is useful for graduate students conducting literature surveys, researchers seeking the latest results in unfamiliar fields, and lecturers in need of information and visual materials for presentations at all levels.
期刊最新文献
Gravity experiments with radio pulsars Post-Newtonian theory for gravitational waves Theoretical and experimental constraints for the equation of state of dense and hot matter Hamiltonian formulation of general relativity and post-Newtonian dynamics of compact binaries Testing theories of gravity with planetary ephemerides
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1