没有司法审查,不再有遏制或孤立

IF 0.1 Q4 MEDICINE, LEGAL Medecine & Droit Pub Date : 2021-02-01 DOI:10.1016/j.meddro.2020.08.002
Jean-Philippe Vauthier (Docteur en Droit, Chargé d’enseignements à l’Université de Guyane, Chercheur associé à l’Institut François Gény (EA 7301) – Université de Lorraine)
{"title":"没有司法审查,不再有遏制或孤立","authors":"Jean-Philippe Vauthier (Docteur en Droit, Chargé d’enseignements à l’Université de Guyane, Chercheur associé à l’Institut François Gény (EA 7301) – Université de Lorraine)","doi":"10.1016/j.meddro.2020.08.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Although of old and common use, the use of isolation and restraint in psychiatry was not regulated until 2016 with the creation of article L. 3222-5-1 of the Public Health Code. However, the Court of Cassation considered that, as a form of care, it was beyond the office of the liberty and custody judge to controle its implementation. Questioned by a plea of unconstitutionality submitted by the Court of Cassation, the Constitutional Council considered, with its decision of 19 June 2020, that these measures constituted a deprivation of liberty requiring judicial review at short notice. The Sages thus declare the provisions of article L. 3222-5-1 unconstitutional, with delayed effect as of December 31, 2020, requiring legislator to rethink and organise the supervision and control of decisions of restraint and isolation.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":41275,"journal":{"name":"Medecine & Droit","volume":"2021 166","pages":"Pages 11-16"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.meddro.2020.08.002","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Plus de contention ni d’isolement sans contrôle du juge judiciaire\",\"authors\":\"Jean-Philippe Vauthier (Docteur en Droit, Chargé d’enseignements à l’Université de Guyane, Chercheur associé à l’Institut François Gény (EA 7301) – Université de Lorraine)\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.meddro.2020.08.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Although of old and common use, the use of isolation and restraint in psychiatry was not regulated until 2016 with the creation of article L. 3222-5-1 of the Public Health Code. However, the Court of Cassation considered that, as a form of care, it was beyond the office of the liberty and custody judge to controle its implementation. Questioned by a plea of unconstitutionality submitted by the Court of Cassation, the Constitutional Council considered, with its decision of 19 June 2020, that these measures constituted a deprivation of liberty requiring judicial review at short notice. The Sages thus declare the provisions of article L. 3222-5-1 unconstitutional, with delayed effect as of December 31, 2020, requiring legislator to rethink and organise the supervision and control of decisions of restraint and isolation.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":41275,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medecine & Droit\",\"volume\":\"2021 166\",\"pages\":\"Pages 11-16\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.meddro.2020.08.002\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medecine & Droit\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1246739120300877\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, LEGAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medecine & Droit","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1246739120300877","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, LEGAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

尽管隔离和约束的做法由来已久,但直到2016年《公共卫生法》第L. 3222-5-1条颁布后,才对精神病学中隔离和约束的做法加以管制。但是,最高上诉法院认为,作为一种监护形式,控制其执行超出了自由和监护法官的职权范围。宪法委员会在上诉法院提出违宪请求的质疑下,于2020年6月19日作出决定,认为这些措施构成剥夺自由,需要在短时间内进行司法审查。因此,圣贤们宣布第L. 3222-5-1条的规定违宪,延迟至2020年12月31日生效,要求立法者重新考虑并组织对克制和孤立决定的监督和控制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Plus de contention ni d’isolement sans contrôle du juge judiciaire

Although of old and common use, the use of isolation and restraint in psychiatry was not regulated until 2016 with the creation of article L. 3222-5-1 of the Public Health Code. However, the Court of Cassation considered that, as a form of care, it was beyond the office of the liberty and custody judge to controle its implementation. Questioned by a plea of unconstitutionality submitted by the Court of Cassation, the Constitutional Council considered, with its decision of 19 June 2020, that these measures constituted a deprivation of liberty requiring judicial review at short notice. The Sages thus declare the provisions of article L. 3222-5-1 unconstitutional, with delayed effect as of December 31, 2020, requiring legislator to rethink and organise the supervision and control of decisions of restraint and isolation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Medecine & Droit
Medecine & Droit MEDICINE, LEGAL-
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
27
期刊介绍: The Scientific Committee of the journal Médecine et Droit includes professors of medicine, professors of law, magistrates, lawyers, court medical experts, and specialists in compensation for physical injury. Médecine et Droit provides: • rigorous and clear support for informative and educational matter • a tool for reflection and actualisation of knowledge • an essential link between doctors and lawyers. Médecine et Droit informs: • doctors on different aspects of law and regulations encountered in their profession • lawyers on the specific problems of the medical profession and important bio-ethical issues
期刊最新文献
Contents Contents Parcours de soins rénové, e-santé et maillage officinal : une réponse complexe à la pénurie de médecins Le concept de race : serpent de mer de la pratique médicale La loi du 10 mai 2024 contre les dérives sectaires : application dans le domaine de la santé : séparer le bon grain scientifique de l’ivraie charlatanesque
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1