{"title":"社论:工人阶级遗产与城市","authors":"Gareth Millington, Andrew Wallace","doi":"10.1386/jucs_00009_1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Here, we introduce a series of concepts and debates that provide a meta-context for the papers on the topic of working-class heritage and the city that follow. We propose Henri Lefebvre's seminal work on the dissolution of the city as a theoretical framing device\n via brief detours through notions of museification, authenticity and 'communicity'. The fundamental problematic, as we see it, is that urban working-class heritage is symptomatic of the dissolution of the industrial city and an attempt ‐ conditioned by economic, social, cultural and\n political imperatives ‐ to reimagine and/or reconfigure the legacies of this city. While we agree that heritage is an active process ‐ it is selected, curated, narrated and interpreted, or 'decoded' by individuals and social groups in a reflexive manner ‐ we also suggest,\n on the evidence of the papers collected here, that working-class heritage delivers an ambivalent experience and response.","PeriodicalId":36149,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Urban Cultural Studies","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Editorial: Working-class heritage and the city\",\"authors\":\"Gareth Millington, Andrew Wallace\",\"doi\":\"10.1386/jucs_00009_1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Here, we introduce a series of concepts and debates that provide a meta-context for the papers on the topic of working-class heritage and the city that follow. We propose Henri Lefebvre's seminal work on the dissolution of the city as a theoretical framing device\\n via brief detours through notions of museification, authenticity and 'communicity'. The fundamental problematic, as we see it, is that urban working-class heritage is symptomatic of the dissolution of the industrial city and an attempt ‐ conditioned by economic, social, cultural and\\n political imperatives ‐ to reimagine and/or reconfigure the legacies of this city. While we agree that heritage is an active process ‐ it is selected, curated, narrated and interpreted, or 'decoded' by individuals and social groups in a reflexive manner ‐ we also suggest,\\n on the evidence of the papers collected here, that working-class heritage delivers an ambivalent experience and response.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36149,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Urban Cultural Studies\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Urban Cultural Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1386/jucs_00009_1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Urban Cultural Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1386/jucs_00009_1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
Abstract Here, we introduce a series of concepts and debates that provide a meta-context for the papers on the topic of working-class heritage and the city that follow. We propose Henri Lefebvre's seminal work on the dissolution of the city as a theoretical framing device
via brief detours through notions of museification, authenticity and 'communicity'. The fundamental problematic, as we see it, is that urban working-class heritage is symptomatic of the dissolution of the industrial city and an attempt ‐ conditioned by economic, social, cultural and
political imperatives ‐ to reimagine and/or reconfigure the legacies of this city. While we agree that heritage is an active process ‐ it is selected, curated, narrated and interpreted, or 'decoded' by individuals and social groups in a reflexive manner ‐ we also suggest,
on the evidence of the papers collected here, that working-class heritage delivers an ambivalent experience and response.