应用集中妊娠模式与个体产前护理对某些产前护理结果的影响

Tyseer Marzouk, I. M. Abd-Allah, H. Shalaby
{"title":"应用集中妊娠模式与个体产前护理对某些产前护理结果的影响","authors":"Tyseer Marzouk, I. M. Abd-Allah, H. Shalaby","doi":"10.5430/CNS.V6N2P91","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: This study aimed to compare effect of applying centering pregnancy model (CPM) versus individual prenatal care on certain prenatal care outcomes. Methods: A quasi experimental research design was followed. A purposive sample of 216 pregnant women without medical or obstetric problems requiring individualized care, was recruited from the Antenatal Outpatient Clinics of Mansoura University Hospitals, Egypt. Participants were randomly assigned to receive prenatal care under CPM or individual prenatal approach. Data were collected for the healthy behaviors adoption using Pregnancy-relevant Health Behaviors scale, women’s extent of troubling about pregnancy physical discomforts using a Pregnancy Symptoms Distress scale, and women’s satisfaction with prenatal care using Patient Participation & Satisfaction Questionnaire. Results: Post-intervention, CPM group equated to individual care group experienced lower distress about experienced pregnancy physical discomforts (8.06 ± 2.40 vs. 15.42 ± 3.84 respectively; t = 16.89 & p < .001), reported higher engagement to pregnancyrelevant health behaviors (37.71 ± 2.91 vs. 29.78 ± 4.3 respectively; t = 15.59 & p < .001), and higher satisfaction with and participation in care (80.8 ± 10.4 and 63.8 ± 11.1 respectively, t = 11.62 & p < .001). Conclusions: Hypotheses of the current study were accepted where CPM of prenatal care was associated with increased women adoption to the pregnancy-relevant healthy behaviors, reduced women distress about the experienced pregnancy physical discomforts and increased women participation and satisfaction about prenatal care.","PeriodicalId":72616,"journal":{"name":"Clinical nursing studies","volume":"6 1","pages":"91"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.5430/CNS.V6N2P91","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of applying centering pregnancy model versus individual prenatal care on certain prenatal care outcomes\",\"authors\":\"Tyseer Marzouk, I. M. Abd-Allah, H. Shalaby\",\"doi\":\"10.5430/CNS.V6N2P91\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: This study aimed to compare effect of applying centering pregnancy model (CPM) versus individual prenatal care on certain prenatal care outcomes. Methods: A quasi experimental research design was followed. A purposive sample of 216 pregnant women without medical or obstetric problems requiring individualized care, was recruited from the Antenatal Outpatient Clinics of Mansoura University Hospitals, Egypt. Participants were randomly assigned to receive prenatal care under CPM or individual prenatal approach. Data were collected for the healthy behaviors adoption using Pregnancy-relevant Health Behaviors scale, women’s extent of troubling about pregnancy physical discomforts using a Pregnancy Symptoms Distress scale, and women’s satisfaction with prenatal care using Patient Participation & Satisfaction Questionnaire. Results: Post-intervention, CPM group equated to individual care group experienced lower distress about experienced pregnancy physical discomforts (8.06 ± 2.40 vs. 15.42 ± 3.84 respectively; t = 16.89 & p < .001), reported higher engagement to pregnancyrelevant health behaviors (37.71 ± 2.91 vs. 29.78 ± 4.3 respectively; t = 15.59 & p < .001), and higher satisfaction with and participation in care (80.8 ± 10.4 and 63.8 ± 11.1 respectively, t = 11.62 & p < .001). Conclusions: Hypotheses of the current study were accepted where CPM of prenatal care was associated with increased women adoption to the pregnancy-relevant healthy behaviors, reduced women distress about the experienced pregnancy physical discomforts and increased women participation and satisfaction about prenatal care.\",\"PeriodicalId\":72616,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical nursing studies\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"91\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-05-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.5430/CNS.V6N2P91\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical nursing studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5430/CNS.V6N2P91\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical nursing studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5430/CNS.V6N2P91","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

目的:本研究旨在比较集中妊娠模式(CPM)和个体产前护理对某些产前护理结果的影响。方法:采用准实验研究设计。从埃及曼苏拉大学医院的产前门诊招募了216名没有医疗或产科问题需要个性化护理的孕妇。参与者被随机分配接受CPM或个体产前护理。使用妊娠相关健康行为量表收集健康行为采用数据,使用妊娠症状-痛苦量表收集女性对妊娠身体不适的困扰程度,使用患者参与和满意度问卷收集女性对产前护理的满意度。结果:干预后,CPM组(相当于个体护理组)对妊娠身体不适的痛苦程度较低(分别为8.06±2.40 vs.15.42±3.84;t=16.89&p<.001),对妊娠相关健康行为的参与程度较高(分别为37.71±2.91 vs.29.78±4.3;t=15.59&p<.001),以及对护理的更高满意度和参与度(分别为80.8±10.4和63.8±11.1,t=11.62&p<.001),减少了女性对怀孕期间身体不适的痛苦,增加了女性对产前护理的参与度和满意度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Effect of applying centering pregnancy model versus individual prenatal care on certain prenatal care outcomes
Objective: This study aimed to compare effect of applying centering pregnancy model (CPM) versus individual prenatal care on certain prenatal care outcomes. Methods: A quasi experimental research design was followed. A purposive sample of 216 pregnant women without medical or obstetric problems requiring individualized care, was recruited from the Antenatal Outpatient Clinics of Mansoura University Hospitals, Egypt. Participants were randomly assigned to receive prenatal care under CPM or individual prenatal approach. Data were collected for the healthy behaviors adoption using Pregnancy-relevant Health Behaviors scale, women’s extent of troubling about pregnancy physical discomforts using a Pregnancy Symptoms Distress scale, and women’s satisfaction with prenatal care using Patient Participation & Satisfaction Questionnaire. Results: Post-intervention, CPM group equated to individual care group experienced lower distress about experienced pregnancy physical discomforts (8.06 ± 2.40 vs. 15.42 ± 3.84 respectively; t = 16.89 & p < .001), reported higher engagement to pregnancyrelevant health behaviors (37.71 ± 2.91 vs. 29.78 ± 4.3 respectively; t = 15.59 & p < .001), and higher satisfaction with and participation in care (80.8 ± 10.4 and 63.8 ± 11.1 respectively, t = 11.62 & p < .001). Conclusions: Hypotheses of the current study were accepted where CPM of prenatal care was associated with increased women adoption to the pregnancy-relevant healthy behaviors, reduced women distress about the experienced pregnancy physical discomforts and increased women participation and satisfaction about prenatal care.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Camp nursing: A unique opportunity for nurses Use of a continuous glucose monitoring device: Perceptions of nursing staff Level of anxiety among children with cancer and their parents in Riyadh City Linking testosterone to men’s health The long-term experiences and career progression of international nurses working in the health sector in England
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1