保罗的伦理学与保罗的伦理学

IF 0.6 1区 哲学 0 RELIGION Journal of Biblical Literature Pub Date : 2023-03-15 DOI:10.15699/jbl.1421.2023.1b
A. Collins
{"title":"保罗的伦理学与保罗的伦理学","authors":"A. Collins","doi":"10.15699/jbl.1421.2023.1b","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:This address begins with a discussion of ethical reasoning in Paul's letters. The unsystematic character of his ethical discourse and its variety are emphasized. The second part is a comparison of Paul's ethical discourse with two recent approaches, the ecclesial ethics of Stanley Hauerwas and the discourse ethics of Jürgen Habermas. The third part is a consideration of feminist and womanist ethics as approaches that fundamentally challenge Paul's ethical reasoning in terms of its authority and usefulness for white women and black women. The conclusion includes the observation that discourse ethics, feminist ethics, and womanist ethics are promising approaches for appropriating Paul's ethics today because they all take up an important theme in Paul's letters: the importance of dealing with conflict while maintaining difference.","PeriodicalId":15251,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Biblical Literature","volume":"142 1","pages":"21 - 6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ethics in Paul and Paul in Ethics\",\"authors\":\"A. Collins\",\"doi\":\"10.15699/jbl.1421.2023.1b\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract:This address begins with a discussion of ethical reasoning in Paul's letters. The unsystematic character of his ethical discourse and its variety are emphasized. The second part is a comparison of Paul's ethical discourse with two recent approaches, the ecclesial ethics of Stanley Hauerwas and the discourse ethics of Jürgen Habermas. The third part is a consideration of feminist and womanist ethics as approaches that fundamentally challenge Paul's ethical reasoning in terms of its authority and usefulness for white women and black women. The conclusion includes the observation that discourse ethics, feminist ethics, and womanist ethics are promising approaches for appropriating Paul's ethics today because they all take up an important theme in Paul's letters: the importance of dealing with conflict while maintaining difference.\",\"PeriodicalId\":15251,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Biblical Literature\",\"volume\":\"142 1\",\"pages\":\"21 - 6\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Biblical Literature\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15699/jbl.1421.2023.1b\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"RELIGION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Biblical Literature","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15699/jbl.1421.2023.1b","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:本演讲首先讨论保罗书信中的伦理推理。强调了其伦理话语的非系统性及其多样性。第二部分将保罗的伦理学话语与豪尔瓦斯的教会伦理学和哈贝马斯的话语伦理学这两种新方法进行比较。第三部分是对女权主义和女性主义伦理的思考,这些方法从根本上挑战了保罗的伦理推理,即它对白人女性和黑人女性的权威和有用性。结论包括观察到,话语伦理学、女权主义伦理学和女性主义伦理学是今天借用保罗伦理学的有前途的方法,因为它们都占据了保罗信件中的一个重要主题:在保持差异的同时处理冲突的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Ethics in Paul and Paul in Ethics
Abstract:This address begins with a discussion of ethical reasoning in Paul's letters. The unsystematic character of his ethical discourse and its variety are emphasized. The second part is a comparison of Paul's ethical discourse with two recent approaches, the ecclesial ethics of Stanley Hauerwas and the discourse ethics of Jürgen Habermas. The third part is a consideration of feminist and womanist ethics as approaches that fundamentally challenge Paul's ethical reasoning in terms of its authority and usefulness for white women and black women. The conclusion includes the observation that discourse ethics, feminist ethics, and womanist ethics are promising approaches for appropriating Paul's ethics today because they all take up an important theme in Paul's letters: the importance of dealing with conflict while maintaining difference.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
16.70%
发文量
30
期刊最新文献
Getting Rigor Right: A Framework for Methodological Choice in Adaptive Monitoring and Evaluation. Love, Marriage, and a Delayed Harvest: Isaiah 61 as the Reversal of the Song of the Vineyard (5:1–7) Remembering God’s Beloved Son: Jeremiah 38:20 LXX and Mark 1:11 Exotica and the Ethiopian of Acts 8:26–40: Toward a Different Fabula John 21:15–19 as a Prophetic Succession: A Reading in Light of 2 Kings 2:1–18
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1