翻转学习环境中的在线协作笔记和讨论论坛

IF 3.3 3区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Australasian Journal of Educational Technology Pub Date : 2023-07-25 DOI:10.14742/ajet.8580
Mik Fanguy, J. Costley, N. Almusharraf, Asma Almusharraf
{"title":"翻转学习环境中的在线协作笔记和讨论论坛","authors":"Mik Fanguy, J. Costley, N. Almusharraf, Asma Almusharraf","doi":"10.14742/ajet.8580","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As the number of students learning in online and flipped contexts grows, an important question arises: to what extent is it necessary to have places or activities where students interact regarding course content? The present paper looked at three flipped learning environments: one with no online collaboration, one featuring an online discussion forum and one involving online collaborative note-taking. The subjects (N = 178) were all graduate students taking a flipped version of an English scientific writing class at a university in South Korea. The results show that students in the experimental conditions with online collaboration (collaborative note-taking and discussion forums) outperformed peers in the control condition (no online collaboration) on individual writing assignments. Furthermore, there was a benefit in the experimental condition with discussion forums regarding students’ group writing scores compared to the control group. These results show the value of implementing online student-to-student collaboration in flipped learning contexts and that both modes of collaboration tested herein add value to students’ learning.\nImplications for practice or policy:\n\nIncorporating online collaborative learning activities improves performance in flipped courses.\nUsing collaborative forums and collaborative note-taking provide similar benefits. and their implementation will improve the online portion of a flipped class.\nFlipped classes generally include an online lecture component but should also feature online collaboration as well.\n","PeriodicalId":47812,"journal":{"name":"Australasian Journal of Educational Technology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Online collaborative note-taking and discussion forums in flipped learning environments\",\"authors\":\"Mik Fanguy, J. Costley, N. Almusharraf, Asma Almusharraf\",\"doi\":\"10.14742/ajet.8580\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"As the number of students learning in online and flipped contexts grows, an important question arises: to what extent is it necessary to have places or activities where students interact regarding course content? The present paper looked at three flipped learning environments: one with no online collaboration, one featuring an online discussion forum and one involving online collaborative note-taking. The subjects (N = 178) were all graduate students taking a flipped version of an English scientific writing class at a university in South Korea. The results show that students in the experimental conditions with online collaboration (collaborative note-taking and discussion forums) outperformed peers in the control condition (no online collaboration) on individual writing assignments. Furthermore, there was a benefit in the experimental condition with discussion forums regarding students’ group writing scores compared to the control group. These results show the value of implementing online student-to-student collaboration in flipped learning contexts and that both modes of collaboration tested herein add value to students’ learning.\\nImplications for practice or policy:\\n\\nIncorporating online collaborative learning activities improves performance in flipped courses.\\nUsing collaborative forums and collaborative note-taking provide similar benefits. and their implementation will improve the online portion of a flipped class.\\nFlipped classes generally include an online lecture component but should also feature online collaboration as well.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":47812,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australasian Journal of Educational Technology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australasian Journal of Educational Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.8580\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australasian Journal of Educational Technology","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.8580","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

随着在网上和翻转环境中学习的学生人数的增加,一个重要的问题出现了:在多大程度上有必要让学生就课程内容进行互动?本文研究了三种翻转学习环境:一种没有在线协作,一种以在线讨论论坛为特色,另一种涉及在线协作笔记。受试者(N=178)都是在韩国一所大学上英语科学写作课的研究生。结果表明,在有在线协作(协作笔记和讨论论坛)的实验条件下,学生在个人写作作业上的表现优于对照条件(无在线协作)下的同龄人。此外,与对照组相比,在实验条件下,讨论论坛对学生的集体写作成绩也有好处。这些结果表明了在翻转学习环境中实现在线学生对学生协作的价值,并且本文测试的两种协作模式都为学生的学习增加了价值。对实践或政策的影响:纳入在线协作学习活动可以提高翻转课程的表现。使用协作论坛和协作笔记也有类似的好处。并且它们的实现将改善翻转课堂的在线部分。翻转课程通常包括在线讲座部分,但也应以在线协作为特色。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Online collaborative note-taking and discussion forums in flipped learning environments
As the number of students learning in online and flipped contexts grows, an important question arises: to what extent is it necessary to have places or activities where students interact regarding course content? The present paper looked at three flipped learning environments: one with no online collaboration, one featuring an online discussion forum and one involving online collaborative note-taking. The subjects (N = 178) were all graduate students taking a flipped version of an English scientific writing class at a university in South Korea. The results show that students in the experimental conditions with online collaboration (collaborative note-taking and discussion forums) outperformed peers in the control condition (no online collaboration) on individual writing assignments. Furthermore, there was a benefit in the experimental condition with discussion forums regarding students’ group writing scores compared to the control group. These results show the value of implementing online student-to-student collaboration in flipped learning contexts and that both modes of collaboration tested herein add value to students’ learning. Implications for practice or policy: Incorporating online collaborative learning activities improves performance in flipped courses. Using collaborative forums and collaborative note-taking provide similar benefits. and their implementation will improve the online portion of a flipped class. Flipped classes generally include an online lecture component but should also feature online collaboration as well.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Australasian Journal of Educational Technology
Australasian Journal of Educational Technology EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
7.30%
发文量
54
审稿时长
36 weeks
期刊最新文献
How to sustain a centralised approach to learning design Privacy versus pedagogy – students’ perceptions of using learning analytics in higher education Access and Participation: The use of Technologies as tools for Inclusion by Spanish University Lecturers The effects of visualisation literacy and data storytelling dashboards on teachers’ cognitive load Students got mail: Do students read semi-tailored emails and what is the impact?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1