数字足迹作为心理健康护理的一种新的转化方法:一篇评论

Julio Licinio, Ma-Li Wong
{"title":"数字足迹作为心理健康护理的一种新的转化方法:一篇评论","authors":"Julio Licinio,&nbsp;Ma-Li Wong","doi":"10.1007/s44192-023-00032-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>There is a crisis in mental health care, with more people suffering from psychiatric disorders than resources that are available for treatment, even though spending is substantial. Millions who suffer from addiction, psychosis, depression and suicidality are either untreated or inadequately treated and organized psychiatry is unable to reach them. Possibly as reflection of under-treatment of psychiatric disorders, the rates of suicide have risen: from 1999 through 2014, the age-adjusted suicide rate in the US increased 24%, from 10.5 to 13.0 per 100,000. Assessment of psychiatric symptoms in ongoing outpatient settings is costly, inadequate and unable to detect clinical changes over time. One's digital phenotype is assessed through footprints left over as result of our interface with technology, including automated assessments of quantity and quality of social media activity, patterns and speed of device usage, and physiological data that is automatically collected, such as location, quantity and type of movement, heart rate, and sleep patterns. The use of digital footprints has been advocated for large-scale data collection that can facilitate psychiatric research in naturalistic settings. We highlight recent papers in Discover Mental Health addressing digital approaches to mental health and we also advance here the concept that digital footprints are ready for clinical use. However, before that happens there needs to be discussion on the appropriate boundaries between care that is driven by signals from digital footprints and the rights to privacy and self-determination.</p>","PeriodicalId":72827,"journal":{"name":"Discover mental health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10501006/pdf/","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Digital footprints as a new translational approach for mental health care: a commentary.\",\"authors\":\"Julio Licinio,&nbsp;Ma-Li Wong\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s44192-023-00032-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>There is a crisis in mental health care, with more people suffering from psychiatric disorders than resources that are available for treatment, even though spending is substantial. Millions who suffer from addiction, psychosis, depression and suicidality are either untreated or inadequately treated and organized psychiatry is unable to reach them. Possibly as reflection of under-treatment of psychiatric disorders, the rates of suicide have risen: from 1999 through 2014, the age-adjusted suicide rate in the US increased 24%, from 10.5 to 13.0 per 100,000. Assessment of psychiatric symptoms in ongoing outpatient settings is costly, inadequate and unable to detect clinical changes over time. One's digital phenotype is assessed through footprints left over as result of our interface with technology, including automated assessments of quantity and quality of social media activity, patterns and speed of device usage, and physiological data that is automatically collected, such as location, quantity and type of movement, heart rate, and sleep patterns. The use of digital footprints has been advocated for large-scale data collection that can facilitate psychiatric research in naturalistic settings. We highlight recent papers in Discover Mental Health addressing digital approaches to mental health and we also advance here the concept that digital footprints are ready for clinical use. However, before that happens there needs to be discussion on the appropriate boundaries between care that is driven by signals from digital footprints and the rights to privacy and self-determination.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72827,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Discover mental health\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10501006/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Discover mental health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s44192-023-00032-7\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Discover mental health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s44192-023-00032-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

精神卫生保健存在危机,尽管支出巨大,但患有精神障碍的人数比可用于治疗的资源还要多。数百万患有成瘾、精神病、抑郁症和自杀的人要么得不到治疗,要么治疗不足,有组织的精神病学无法联系到他们。自杀率上升可能反映了精神障碍治疗不足:从1999年到2014年,美国经年龄调整的自杀率上升了24%,从每10万人10.5人上升到13.0人。在正在进行的门诊环境中对精神症状的评估是昂贵的、不充分的,并且无法检测到随着时间的推移的临床变化。一个人的数字表型是通过我们与技术接口留下的足迹来评估的,包括对社交媒体活动的数量和质量、设备使用的模式和速度以及自动收集的生理数据的自动评估,如运动的位置、数量和类型、心率和睡眠模式。人们提倡使用数字足迹进行大规模数据收集,以促进在自然环境中进行精神病学研究。我们在《探索心理健康》杂志上重点介绍了最近关于心理健康数字方法的论文,我们还在这里提出了数字足迹可供临床使用的概念。然而,在这之前,需要讨论由数字足迹信号驱动的护理与隐私权和自决权之间的适当界限。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Digital footprints as a new translational approach for mental health care: a commentary.

There is a crisis in mental health care, with more people suffering from psychiatric disorders than resources that are available for treatment, even though spending is substantial. Millions who suffer from addiction, psychosis, depression and suicidality are either untreated or inadequately treated and organized psychiatry is unable to reach them. Possibly as reflection of under-treatment of psychiatric disorders, the rates of suicide have risen: from 1999 through 2014, the age-adjusted suicide rate in the US increased 24%, from 10.5 to 13.0 per 100,000. Assessment of psychiatric symptoms in ongoing outpatient settings is costly, inadequate and unable to detect clinical changes over time. One's digital phenotype is assessed through footprints left over as result of our interface with technology, including automated assessments of quantity and quality of social media activity, patterns and speed of device usage, and physiological data that is automatically collected, such as location, quantity and type of movement, heart rate, and sleep patterns. The use of digital footprints has been advocated for large-scale data collection that can facilitate psychiatric research in naturalistic settings. We highlight recent papers in Discover Mental Health addressing digital approaches to mental health and we also advance here the concept that digital footprints are ready for clinical use. However, before that happens there needs to be discussion on the appropriate boundaries between care that is driven by signals from digital footprints and the rights to privacy and self-determination.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Collaborative strategies for adolescent suicide prevention: insights from Slovakia and Kyrgyzstan. Mental distress and associated factors among undergraduate students: evidence from a cross-sectional study at the University of Dodoma, Tanzania. Validation of the Japanese version of the Patient Health Questionnaire-4 (PHQ-4-J) to screen for depression and anxiety. Does major make a difference? Mental health literacy and its relation to college major in a diverse sample of undergraduate students. Understanding community-based mental health interventions among migrant workers in Singapore.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1