“永恒之光的世界”:艾格斯的《圆圈》与霍克海默、阿多诺的启蒙辩证法

IF 0.1 3区 文学 0 LITERATURE COLLEGE LITERATURE Pub Date : 2021-07-27 DOI:10.1353/lit.2021.0015
Sebastian Tants-Boestad
{"title":"“永恒之光的世界”:艾格斯的《圆圈》与霍克海默、阿多诺的启蒙辩证法","authors":"Sebastian Tants-Boestad","doi":"10.1353/lit.2021.0015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:This essay suggests a reading of Dave Eggers's 2013 novel The Circle as a critique of modernity. It argues that Eggers's dystopian novel can be read as an artistic take on Max Horkheimer and Theodor Adorno's philosophical critique of Enlightenment ideology, as put forward most prominently in their Dialectic of Enlightenment (1944/47). The puzzling tendency of \"enlightened,\" rationally-minded individuals to subject themselves to totalitarian and dehumanizing systems is identified as a common concern of the Frankfurt School theorists and of Eggers's dystopia. The Circle, in this perspective, is read as a critical study of the twenty-first-century's version of Enlightenment ideology, and of the social mechanisms that lead to a state of \"voluntary servitude.\" By means of a theory-informed analysis of the novel's principal thematic concerns, it is demonstrated that the world constructed by Eggers exhibits central traits associated with an enlightened society by Horkheimer and Adorno, and it is shown how the novel embeds its depiction of the self-destructive tendencies of this society in a discussion of social media and digital technology. This leads, eventually, to a reconsideration of the intellectual significance of The Circle.","PeriodicalId":44728,"journal":{"name":"COLLEGE LITERATURE","volume":"48 1","pages":"406 - 434"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"\\\"A World of Perpetual Light\\\": Dave Eggers's The Circle and Horkheimer and Adorno's Dialectic of Enlightenment\",\"authors\":\"Sebastian Tants-Boestad\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/lit.2021.0015\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract:This essay suggests a reading of Dave Eggers's 2013 novel The Circle as a critique of modernity. It argues that Eggers's dystopian novel can be read as an artistic take on Max Horkheimer and Theodor Adorno's philosophical critique of Enlightenment ideology, as put forward most prominently in their Dialectic of Enlightenment (1944/47). The puzzling tendency of \\\"enlightened,\\\" rationally-minded individuals to subject themselves to totalitarian and dehumanizing systems is identified as a common concern of the Frankfurt School theorists and of Eggers's dystopia. The Circle, in this perspective, is read as a critical study of the twenty-first-century's version of Enlightenment ideology, and of the social mechanisms that lead to a state of \\\"voluntary servitude.\\\" By means of a theory-informed analysis of the novel's principal thematic concerns, it is demonstrated that the world constructed by Eggers exhibits central traits associated with an enlightened society by Horkheimer and Adorno, and it is shown how the novel embeds its depiction of the self-destructive tendencies of this society in a discussion of social media and digital technology. This leads, eventually, to a reconsideration of the intellectual significance of The Circle.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44728,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"COLLEGE LITERATURE\",\"volume\":\"48 1\",\"pages\":\"406 - 434\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"COLLEGE LITERATURE\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/lit.2021.0015\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LITERATURE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"COLLEGE LITERATURE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/lit.2021.0015","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:本文建议阅读戴夫·艾格斯2013年的小说《圆圈》,作为对现代性的批判。它认为,艾格斯的反乌托邦小说可以被解读为对马克斯·霍克海默和西奥多·阿多诺对启蒙思想的哲学批判的艺术诠释,这在他们的《启蒙辩证法》(1944/47)中最为突出。“开明”、理性的个人将自己置于极权主义和非人化制度之下的令人困惑的倾向被认为是法兰克福学派理论家和艾格斯反乌托邦的共同担忧。从这个角度来看,《圆圈》被解读为对21世纪启蒙思想版本以及导致“自愿奴役”状态的社会机制的批判性研究,通过对霍克海默和阿多诺的研究表明,艾格斯构建的世界展现了与一个开明社会相关的核心特征,并展示了小说如何将其对这个社会自我毁灭倾向的描述嵌入到对社交媒体和数字技术的讨论中。这最终导致了对the Circle的智力意义的重新思考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
"A World of Perpetual Light": Dave Eggers's The Circle and Horkheimer and Adorno's Dialectic of Enlightenment
Abstract:This essay suggests a reading of Dave Eggers's 2013 novel The Circle as a critique of modernity. It argues that Eggers's dystopian novel can be read as an artistic take on Max Horkheimer and Theodor Adorno's philosophical critique of Enlightenment ideology, as put forward most prominently in their Dialectic of Enlightenment (1944/47). The puzzling tendency of "enlightened," rationally-minded individuals to subject themselves to totalitarian and dehumanizing systems is identified as a common concern of the Frankfurt School theorists and of Eggers's dystopia. The Circle, in this perspective, is read as a critical study of the twenty-first-century's version of Enlightenment ideology, and of the social mechanisms that lead to a state of "voluntary servitude." By means of a theory-informed analysis of the novel's principal thematic concerns, it is demonstrated that the world constructed by Eggers exhibits central traits associated with an enlightened society by Horkheimer and Adorno, and it is shown how the novel embeds its depiction of the self-destructive tendencies of this society in a discussion of social media and digital technology. This leads, eventually, to a reconsideration of the intellectual significance of The Circle.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
COLLEGE LITERATURE
COLLEGE LITERATURE LITERATURE-
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
27
期刊最新文献
Science, Michel Serres, and the Topological Poetics of A. R. Ammons Literature and Professional Society: Modernism, Aesthetics, and Ian McEwan's Saturday Academic and Conversational Genre: Revisionist Visions of Anti-Racist Rhetoric in Claudia Rankine's Just Us The Twentieth-Century Adaptation of the Captivity Narrative and the Act of Looking in Elmore Leonard's Western Stories Hanif Kureishi's Passages of Queerness: Diasporic Sensualities and the Creation of Selves
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1