休闲型运动员腘绳肌单腱近端撕脱的非手术治疗

Sports medicine international open Pub Date : 2023-07-04 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1055/a-1991-3719
Olivia J Bono, Julianne Forlizzi, Sarav S Shah, Christopher R Nacca, Eric Manz, Katharine Ives, Suzanne L Miller
{"title":"休闲型运动员腘绳肌单腱近端撕脱的非手术治疗","authors":"Olivia J Bono, Julianne Forlizzi, Sarav S Shah, Christopher R Nacca, Eric Manz, Katharine Ives, Suzanne L Miller","doi":"10.1055/a-1991-3719","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The purpose of this study was to evaluate the patient-reported and objective functional outcomes of those patients who underwent nonoperative management of a single-tendon retracted proximal hamstring avulsion. A retrospective case series of consecutive patients with an MRI-confirmed diagnosis of single-tendon proximal hamstring avulsion treated nonoperatively with at least one year of follow-up was performed. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) including SF-12v2, Lower Extremity Functional Score (LEFS), Hip Outcome Score-activities of daily living and sport subscale (HOS-ADL, HOS-SS) were prospectively collected. Objective measurements included strength testing of the affected and unaffected limbs with a handheld dynamometer and single-leg hop test. Student's t-tests were used to determine differences between limbs. Eleven of fourteen patients were available for PROMs (79%); five completed functional testing. Subjective scores revealed a mean SF-12v2 mental component score of 56.53±8.2, and a physical component score of 50.1±12.7. LEFS was 84%±19.8, HOS-ADL 87.9%±17.2, and HOS-SS 80.9%±24. The differences between limbs were not statistically significant for strength at 45 or 90 degrees of knee flexion, nor for single-leg hop distance. Patients in a non-professional athlete population who undergo nonoperative management of single-tendon retracted proximal hamstring avulsions can expect good subjective and objective outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":74857,"journal":{"name":"Sports medicine international open","volume":"07 1","pages":"E9-E14"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10974739/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Nonoperative Treatment of Single-Tendon Proximal Hamstring Avulsions in Recreational Athletes.\",\"authors\":\"Olivia J Bono, Julianne Forlizzi, Sarav S Shah, Christopher R Nacca, Eric Manz, Katharine Ives, Suzanne L Miller\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/a-1991-3719\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The purpose of this study was to evaluate the patient-reported and objective functional outcomes of those patients who underwent nonoperative management of a single-tendon retracted proximal hamstring avulsion. A retrospective case series of consecutive patients with an MRI-confirmed diagnosis of single-tendon proximal hamstring avulsion treated nonoperatively with at least one year of follow-up was performed. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) including SF-12v2, Lower Extremity Functional Score (LEFS), Hip Outcome Score-activities of daily living and sport subscale (HOS-ADL, HOS-SS) were prospectively collected. Objective measurements included strength testing of the affected and unaffected limbs with a handheld dynamometer and single-leg hop test. Student's t-tests were used to determine differences between limbs. Eleven of fourteen patients were available for PROMs (79%); five completed functional testing. Subjective scores revealed a mean SF-12v2 mental component score of 56.53±8.2, and a physical component score of 50.1±12.7. LEFS was 84%±19.8, HOS-ADL 87.9%±17.2, and HOS-SS 80.9%±24. The differences between limbs were not statistically significant for strength at 45 or 90 degrees of knee flexion, nor for single-leg hop distance. Patients in a non-professional athlete population who undergo nonoperative management of single-tendon retracted proximal hamstring avulsions can expect good subjective and objective outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74857,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sports medicine international open\",\"volume\":\"07 1\",\"pages\":\"E9-E14\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10974739/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sports medicine international open\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-1991-3719\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sports medicine international open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-1991-3719","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要本研究的目的是评估接受非手术治疗的单腱回缩性近端腘绳肌撕脱伤患者的患者报告和客观功能结果。对一系列经MRI确诊为单肌腱近端腘绳肌腱撕脱伤的连续患者进行了回顾性病例研究,这些患者接受了非手术治疗,并进行了至少一年的随访。前瞻性收集患者报告的结果测量(PROMs),包括SF-12v2、下肢功能评分(LEFS)、日常生活髋关节结果评分活动和运动分量表(HOS-ADL,HOS-SS)。目标测量包括用手持式测功机对受影响和未受影响的肢体进行强度测试和单腿跳跃测试。学生t检验用于确定肢体之间的差异。14名患者中有11人可接受胎膜早破(79%);五个完成了功能测试。主观得分显示,SF-12v2精神成分得分平均为56.53±8.2,身体成分得分为50.1±12.7。LEFS为84%±19.8,HOS-ADL为87.9%±17.2,HOS-SS为80.9%±24。四肢之间的差异在膝盖弯曲45度或90度时的力量和单腿跳跃距离方面都没有统计学意义。在非职业运动员群体中,接受单腱回缩近端腘绳肌撕裂非手术治疗的患者可以预期良好的主观和客观结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Nonoperative Treatment of Single-Tendon Proximal Hamstring Avulsions in Recreational Athletes.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the patient-reported and objective functional outcomes of those patients who underwent nonoperative management of a single-tendon retracted proximal hamstring avulsion. A retrospective case series of consecutive patients with an MRI-confirmed diagnosis of single-tendon proximal hamstring avulsion treated nonoperatively with at least one year of follow-up was performed. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) including SF-12v2, Lower Extremity Functional Score (LEFS), Hip Outcome Score-activities of daily living and sport subscale (HOS-ADL, HOS-SS) were prospectively collected. Objective measurements included strength testing of the affected and unaffected limbs with a handheld dynamometer and single-leg hop test. Student's t-tests were used to determine differences between limbs. Eleven of fourteen patients were available for PROMs (79%); five completed functional testing. Subjective scores revealed a mean SF-12v2 mental component score of 56.53±8.2, and a physical component score of 50.1±12.7. LEFS was 84%±19.8, HOS-ADL 87.9%±17.2, and HOS-SS 80.9%±24. The differences between limbs were not statistically significant for strength at 45 or 90 degrees of knee flexion, nor for single-leg hop distance. Patients in a non-professional athlete population who undergo nonoperative management of single-tendon retracted proximal hamstring avulsions can expect good subjective and objective outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Win Your Race Goal: A Generalized Approach to Prediction of Running Performance. Effect of Lower Limb Muscle Fatigue on Dynamic Balance Performance in Healthy Young Adults: Role of Arm Movement. Effects of Exercise-Induced Changes in Myokine Expression on the Tumor Microenvironment. One year of heavy resistance training modifies muscle fiber characteristics in elderly Comparison of Neuromuscular Fatigue in Powerlifting Paralympics in Different Training Methods.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1