资本主义改革与中国的极端贫困:前所未有的进步还是收入紧缩?

IF 3.8 2区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS New Political Economy Pub Date : 2023-07-02 DOI:10.1080/13563467.2023.2217087
D. Sullivan, M. Moatsos, J. Hickel
{"title":"资本主义改革与中国的极端贫困:前所未有的进步还是收入紧缩?","authors":"D. Sullivan, M. Moatsos, J. Hickel","doi":"10.1080/13563467.2023.2217087","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It is widely believed that China ’ s socialist economy had relatively high rates of extreme poverty while the capitalist reforms of the 1980s and 1990s delivered rapid progress. This narrative relies on World Bank estimates of the share of people living on less than $1.90 a day (2011 PPP), which show a sharp decline from 88 per cent in 1981 to zero by 2018. However, the World Bank ’ s poverty line has been critiqued for ignoring variations in the actual cost of meeting basic needs. In this paper we review data published by the OECD on the share of people unable to a ff ord a subsistence basket. These estimates indicate that from 1981 to 1990, when most of China ’ s socialist provisioning systems were still in place, the country ’ s extreme poverty rate was on average only 5.6 per cent, substantially lower than in capitalist economies of comparable size and income at the time: 51 per cent in India, 36.5 per cent in Indonesia, and 29.5 per cent in Brazil. China ’ s comparatively strong performance is corroborated by data on other social indicators. Moreover, extreme poverty in China increased during the capitalist reforms of the 1990s, reaching a peak of 68 per cent, as privatisation in fl ated the prices of essential goods and thus de fl ated the incomes of the working classes. These results indicate that socialist provisioning policies can be e ff ective at preventing extreme poverty, while market reforms may threaten people ’ s ability to meet basic needs.","PeriodicalId":51447,"journal":{"name":"New Political Economy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Capitalist reforms and extreme poverty in China: unprecedented progress or income deflation?\",\"authors\":\"D. Sullivan, M. Moatsos, J. Hickel\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13563467.2023.2217087\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"It is widely believed that China ’ s socialist economy had relatively high rates of extreme poverty while the capitalist reforms of the 1980s and 1990s delivered rapid progress. This narrative relies on World Bank estimates of the share of people living on less than $1.90 a day (2011 PPP), which show a sharp decline from 88 per cent in 1981 to zero by 2018. However, the World Bank ’ s poverty line has been critiqued for ignoring variations in the actual cost of meeting basic needs. In this paper we review data published by the OECD on the share of people unable to a ff ord a subsistence basket. These estimates indicate that from 1981 to 1990, when most of China ’ s socialist provisioning systems were still in place, the country ’ s extreme poverty rate was on average only 5.6 per cent, substantially lower than in capitalist economies of comparable size and income at the time: 51 per cent in India, 36.5 per cent in Indonesia, and 29.5 per cent in Brazil. China ’ s comparatively strong performance is corroborated by data on other social indicators. Moreover, extreme poverty in China increased during the capitalist reforms of the 1990s, reaching a peak of 68 per cent, as privatisation in fl ated the prices of essential goods and thus de fl ated the incomes of the working classes. These results indicate that socialist provisioning policies can be e ff ective at preventing extreme poverty, while market reforms may threaten people ’ s ability to meet basic needs.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51447,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"New Political Economy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"New Political Economy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13563467.2023.2217087\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New Political Economy","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13563467.2023.2217087","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

人们普遍认为,中国社会主义经济的极端贫困率相对较高,而20世纪80年代和90年代的资本主义改革取得了快速进展。这种说法依赖于世界银行对每天生活费低于1.90美元的人口比例(2011年购买力平价)的估计,该估计显示,生活费从1981年的88%急剧下降到2018年的零。然而,世界银行的贫困线因忽视满足基本需求的实际成本变化而受到批评。在这篇论文中,我们回顾了经合组织发布的关于无法维持生计的人口比例的数据。这些估计表明,从1981年到1990年,当中国的大多数社会主义供给体系仍然存在时,中国的极端贫困率平均仅为5.6%,大大低于当时规模和收入相当的资本主义经济体:印度为51%,印度尼西亚为36.5%,巴西为29.5%。中国相对强劲的表现得到了其他社会指标数据的证实。此外,在20世纪90年代的资本主义改革期间,中国的极端贫困加剧,达到68%的峰值,因为私有化降低了基本商品的价格,从而降低了工人阶级的收入。这些结果表明,社会主义供给政策可以有效地防止极端贫困,而市场改革可能威胁到人们满足基本需求的能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Capitalist reforms and extreme poverty in China: unprecedented progress or income deflation?
It is widely believed that China ’ s socialist economy had relatively high rates of extreme poverty while the capitalist reforms of the 1980s and 1990s delivered rapid progress. This narrative relies on World Bank estimates of the share of people living on less than $1.90 a day (2011 PPP), which show a sharp decline from 88 per cent in 1981 to zero by 2018. However, the World Bank ’ s poverty line has been critiqued for ignoring variations in the actual cost of meeting basic needs. In this paper we review data published by the OECD on the share of people unable to a ff ord a subsistence basket. These estimates indicate that from 1981 to 1990, when most of China ’ s socialist provisioning systems were still in place, the country ’ s extreme poverty rate was on average only 5.6 per cent, substantially lower than in capitalist economies of comparable size and income at the time: 51 per cent in India, 36.5 per cent in Indonesia, and 29.5 per cent in Brazil. China ’ s comparatively strong performance is corroborated by data on other social indicators. Moreover, extreme poverty in China increased during the capitalist reforms of the 1990s, reaching a peak of 68 per cent, as privatisation in fl ated the prices of essential goods and thus de fl ated the incomes of the working classes. These results indicate that socialist provisioning policies can be e ff ective at preventing extreme poverty, while market reforms may threaten people ’ s ability to meet basic needs.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.10
自引率
9.50%
发文量
41
期刊介绍: New Political Economy aims to create a forum for work which combines the breadth of vision which characterised the classical political economy of the nineteenth century with the analytical advances of twentieth century social science. It seeks to represent the terrain of political economy scholarship across different disciplines, emphasising original and innovative work which explores new approaches and methodologies, and addresses core debates and issues of historical and contemporary relevance.
期刊最新文献
Varieties of central banking: the Nordic Model beyond a fiscal-centric approach Understanding power, culture and institutional change: a revised approach to political settlements analysis The ecological currency hierarchy: empirical support for currency power driven asymmetries in environmental and social autonomy Towards a degrowth transition: bringing interests back in Rentier capitalism, social reproduction, and the limits of liberalism: mapping gendered asset value in Kuwait
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1