根据无菌脱细胞真皮基质的大小在直接植入乳房重建中引流和形成血清瘤

T. Kong, Taegon Kim, Jun-Ho Lee
{"title":"根据无菌脱细胞真皮基质的大小在直接植入乳房重建中引流和形成血清瘤","authors":"T. Kong, Taegon Kim, Jun-Ho Lee","doi":"10.14730/aaps.2022.00535","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Acellular dermal matrix (ADM) is widely used for prosthetic breast reconstruction. Although many studies have investigated the efficacy and complications of ADM in prosthetic breast reconstruction, studies on drainage and seroma formation according to the size of ADM manufactured using the same process are lacking. This study analyzed drainage and seroma formation according to the size of sterile ADM.Methods From January 2011 to June 2018, the authors retrospectively reviewed the medical charts of patients who underwent direct-to-implant breast reconstruction using MegaDerm at a single institution. The ADMs used were classified as small or large groups. The two groups were compared in terms of the volume and duration time of two closed-suction drains (supramuscular and submuscular drains). Seroma and infection risk were also analyzed.Results Of 344 patients, 69 were included. Among them, 22 patients were in the small-ADM group and 47 patients were in the large-ADM group. The supramuscular drain volume (P=0.295) and time (P=0.365) were not significantly different between the two groups. However, the submuscular (P=0.001) and total drain volume (P=0.004) were higher in the large-ADM group. In addition, seroma occurred significantly more frequently in the large-ADM group (P=0.048), but there was no significant difference in minor infections (P=0.088).Conclusions The size of sterile ADM affected drainage and seroma formation, with a larger size increasing drain volume and seroma risk. This study could provide a clinical basis for the safe usage of large sterile ADM.","PeriodicalId":41514,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Drainage and seroma formation according to the size of sterile acellular dermal matrix in direct-to-implant breast reconstruction\",\"authors\":\"T. Kong, Taegon Kim, Jun-Ho Lee\",\"doi\":\"10.14730/aaps.2022.00535\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background Acellular dermal matrix (ADM) is widely used for prosthetic breast reconstruction. Although many studies have investigated the efficacy and complications of ADM in prosthetic breast reconstruction, studies on drainage and seroma formation according to the size of ADM manufactured using the same process are lacking. This study analyzed drainage and seroma formation according to the size of sterile ADM.Methods From January 2011 to June 2018, the authors retrospectively reviewed the medical charts of patients who underwent direct-to-implant breast reconstruction using MegaDerm at a single institution. The ADMs used were classified as small or large groups. The two groups were compared in terms of the volume and duration time of two closed-suction drains (supramuscular and submuscular drains). Seroma and infection risk were also analyzed.Results Of 344 patients, 69 were included. Among them, 22 patients were in the small-ADM group and 47 patients were in the large-ADM group. The supramuscular drain volume (P=0.295) and time (P=0.365) were not significantly different between the two groups. However, the submuscular (P=0.001) and total drain volume (P=0.004) were higher in the large-ADM group. In addition, seroma occurred significantly more frequently in the large-ADM group (P=0.048), but there was no significant difference in minor infections (P=0.088).Conclusions The size of sterile ADM affected drainage and seroma formation, with a larger size increasing drain volume and seroma risk. This study could provide a clinical basis for the safe usage of large sterile ADM.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41514,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archives of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archives of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14730/aaps.2022.00535\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14730/aaps.2022.00535","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景脱细胞真皮基质(ADM)广泛应用于人工乳房重建。尽管许多研究已经调查了ADM在假体乳房重建中的疗效和并发症,但缺乏根据使用相同工艺制造的ADM的大小对引流和血清瘤形成的研究。本研究根据无菌ADM的大小分析了引流和血清瘤的形成。方法从2011年1月到2018年6月,作者回顾性回顾了在单一机构使用MegaDerm进行直接植入乳房重建的患者的病历。使用的ADM分为小组或大组。比较两组的两个闭合吸引管(肌上和肌下引流管)的体积和持续时间。还分析了血清瘤和感染风险。结果344例患者中,69例被纳入。其中小ADM组22例,大ADM组47例。两组之间的肌上引流量(P=0.295)和时间(P=0.365)没有显著差异。然而,大ADM组的肌下(P=0.001)和总引流量(P=0.004)更高。此外,血清瘤在大ADM组中发生率明显更高(P=0.048),但在轻度感染中没有显著差异(P=0.088)。结论无菌ADM的大小影响引流和血清瘤的形成,较大的大小会增加引流量和血清瘤风险。本研究可为大型无菌ADM的安全使用提供临床依据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Drainage and seroma formation according to the size of sterile acellular dermal matrix in direct-to-implant breast reconstruction
Background Acellular dermal matrix (ADM) is widely used for prosthetic breast reconstruction. Although many studies have investigated the efficacy and complications of ADM in prosthetic breast reconstruction, studies on drainage and seroma formation according to the size of ADM manufactured using the same process are lacking. This study analyzed drainage and seroma formation according to the size of sterile ADM.Methods From January 2011 to June 2018, the authors retrospectively reviewed the medical charts of patients who underwent direct-to-implant breast reconstruction using MegaDerm at a single institution. The ADMs used were classified as small or large groups. The two groups were compared in terms of the volume and duration time of two closed-suction drains (supramuscular and submuscular drains). Seroma and infection risk were also analyzed.Results Of 344 patients, 69 were included. Among them, 22 patients were in the small-ADM group and 47 patients were in the large-ADM group. The supramuscular drain volume (P=0.295) and time (P=0.365) were not significantly different between the two groups. However, the submuscular (P=0.001) and total drain volume (P=0.004) were higher in the large-ADM group. In addition, seroma occurred significantly more frequently in the large-ADM group (P=0.048), but there was no significant difference in minor infections (P=0.088).Conclusions The size of sterile ADM affected drainage and seroma formation, with a larger size increasing drain volume and seroma risk. This study could provide a clinical basis for the safe usage of large sterile ADM.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
33.30%
发文量
35
期刊最新文献
Comparison of the effects of zinc oxide and zinc aspartic acid chelate on the performance of weaning pigs. Rabbit model for the study of nasal tip plasty: a comparative cephalometric analysis after rhinoplasty Modified cervicofacial transposition flap: a case report of aesthetic considerations after resection of a huge facial squamous cell carcinoma The eye of a maiden in “The Mad Painter” and upper blepharoplasty Subpectoral dissection using an ultrasonic energy device in prosthetic breast reconstruction
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1