利安妮·M·理查森的《迈克尔·菲尔德的形式》(综述)

IF 0.2 3区 社会学 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY VICTORIAN STUDIES Pub Date : 2022-10-01 DOI:10.2979/victorianstudies.64.3.11
Carolyn M. Dever
{"title":"利安妮·M·理查森的《迈克尔·菲尔德的形式》(综述)","authors":"Carolyn M. Dever","doi":"10.2979/victorianstudies.64.3.11","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"muddles our familiar sense of unified agency. A subject leading and a subject being led: who is doing the living? The fragmented image is further troubled by the plurality Miller postulates, namely, that one could have led many lives (but, alas, lives one). Moreover, we are haunted by the suggestion that the singular life we are living is not being sufficiently well lived—or is, in a Thoreauvian sense, “unlived” (xvi). “When I described my project to a friend,” Miller confides, “he said, ‘Ah—YOLO + FOMO’” (162). It is an algorithm that fits the times, no doubt, and a tidy condensation, yet it may skirt the shades of difference between “unled” (possible but not taken) and “unlived” (actual but not fulfilled). Those familiar with work on unled lives by Gary Saul Morson, Michael André Bernstein, Hilary Dannenberg, Catherine Gallagher, and perhaps most spiritually aligned, Adam Phillips and James Wood, should find Miller’s accomplished pastiche of value. In addition to his knowing selection and assembly of examples (a veritable commonplace book of unled lives), Miller is a profoundly gifted close reader—someone whose company one would like to keep, and return to again and again. David LaRocca Cornell University","PeriodicalId":45845,"journal":{"name":"VICTORIAN STUDIES","volume":"64 1","pages":"468 - 470"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Forms of Michael Field by LeeAnne M. Richardson (review)\",\"authors\":\"Carolyn M. Dever\",\"doi\":\"10.2979/victorianstudies.64.3.11\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"muddles our familiar sense of unified agency. A subject leading and a subject being led: who is doing the living? The fragmented image is further troubled by the plurality Miller postulates, namely, that one could have led many lives (but, alas, lives one). Moreover, we are haunted by the suggestion that the singular life we are living is not being sufficiently well lived—or is, in a Thoreauvian sense, “unlived” (xvi). “When I described my project to a friend,” Miller confides, “he said, ‘Ah—YOLO + FOMO’” (162). It is an algorithm that fits the times, no doubt, and a tidy condensation, yet it may skirt the shades of difference between “unled” (possible but not taken) and “unlived” (actual but not fulfilled). Those familiar with work on unled lives by Gary Saul Morson, Michael André Bernstein, Hilary Dannenberg, Catherine Gallagher, and perhaps most spiritually aligned, Adam Phillips and James Wood, should find Miller’s accomplished pastiche of value. In addition to his knowing selection and assembly of examples (a veritable commonplace book of unled lives), Miller is a profoundly gifted close reader—someone whose company one would like to keep, and return to again and again. David LaRocca Cornell University\",\"PeriodicalId\":45845,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"VICTORIAN STUDIES\",\"volume\":\"64 1\",\"pages\":\"468 - 470\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"VICTORIAN STUDIES\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2979/victorianstudies.64.3.11\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"VICTORIAN STUDIES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2979/victorianstudies.64.3.11","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

混淆了我们熟悉的统一代理的概念。一个主体在引导,一个主体被引导:谁在做活着的事?米勒的多元假设进一步困扰着支离破碎的形象,即一个人本可以过很多次生活(但遗憾的是,只过一次)。此外,我们被这样一种说法所困扰,即我们所过的独特生活没有过得足够好——或者,在梭罗的意义上,“没有生活”(xvi)。“当我向一个朋友描述我的项目时,”米勒透露,“他说,‘啊——YOLO+FOMO’”(162)。毫无疑问,这是一种适合时代的算法,是一种整洁的浓缩,但它可能会避开“未使用”(可能但未使用)和“未使用的”(实际但未实现)之间的差异。那些熟悉加里·索尔·莫森(Gary Saul Morson)、迈克尔·安德雷·伯恩斯坦(Michael AndréBernstein)、希拉里·丹宁伯格(Hilary Dannenberg)、凯瑟琳·加拉格尔(Catherine Gallagher)以及亚当·菲利普斯(Adam Phillips)和詹姆斯·伍德(James Wood。除了他对例子的熟悉选择和汇编(一本关于无主生活的普通书籍)之外,米勒还是一位极具天赋的亲密读者——一个人们想与之为伍,并一次又一次地与之为伴的人。David LaRocca康奈尔大学
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Forms of Michael Field by LeeAnne M. Richardson (review)
muddles our familiar sense of unified agency. A subject leading and a subject being led: who is doing the living? The fragmented image is further troubled by the plurality Miller postulates, namely, that one could have led many lives (but, alas, lives one). Moreover, we are haunted by the suggestion that the singular life we are living is not being sufficiently well lived—or is, in a Thoreauvian sense, “unlived” (xvi). “When I described my project to a friend,” Miller confides, “he said, ‘Ah—YOLO + FOMO’” (162). It is an algorithm that fits the times, no doubt, and a tidy condensation, yet it may skirt the shades of difference between “unled” (possible but not taken) and “unlived” (actual but not fulfilled). Those familiar with work on unled lives by Gary Saul Morson, Michael André Bernstein, Hilary Dannenberg, Catherine Gallagher, and perhaps most spiritually aligned, Adam Phillips and James Wood, should find Miller’s accomplished pastiche of value. In addition to his knowing selection and assembly of examples (a veritable commonplace book of unled lives), Miller is a profoundly gifted close reader—someone whose company one would like to keep, and return to again and again. David LaRocca Cornell University
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
VICTORIAN STUDIES
VICTORIAN STUDIES HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
9.10%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: For more than 50 years, Victorian Studies has been devoted to the study of British culture of the Victorian age. It regularly includes interdisciplinary articles on comparative literature, social and political history, and the histories of education, philosophy, fine arts, economics, law and science, as well as review essays, and an extensive book review section. An annual cumulative and fully searchable bibliography of noteworthy publications that have a bearing on the Victorian period is available electronically and is included in the cost of a subscription. Victorian Studies Online Bibliography
期刊最新文献
Necrotizing Primary Angiitis of the Central Nervous System Mimicking Brain Abscess: A Case Report and Literature Review. Quaint, Exquisite: Victorian Aesthetics and the Idea of Japan by Grace E. Lavery (review) Notes Toward a Water Acknowledgement Victorian Literary Culture and Ancient Egypt, edited by Eleanor Dobson The Jewish Decadence: Jews and the Aesthetics of Modernity by Jonathan Freedman (review)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1