对极权主义概念的反思

M. Aguerre
{"title":"对极权主义概念的反思","authors":"M. Aguerre","doi":"10.22187/RFD2018N45A14","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper aims to justify the concept of “Totalitarianism” to designate the most violent and criminal regimes of the Twentieth Century: Stalinism and Nazism. Its critics have denied that this concept can be applied to the period of government of Stalin in Soviet Union, with the justification that violence was necessary for the industrialization and progress of that country. We consider that the identities between National Socialism and Bolshevik Communism are much greater than their differences and therefore justify the use of the term “Totalitarianism” to allude to both regimes. In the end, the version discussed I the exposed by the Italian historian Enzo Traverso in his book “Totalitarianism”.","PeriodicalId":53805,"journal":{"name":"Revista de la Facultad de Derecho","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Una reflexión sobre el concepto de totalitarismo\",\"authors\":\"M. Aguerre\",\"doi\":\"10.22187/RFD2018N45A14\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper aims to justify the concept of “Totalitarianism” to designate the most violent and criminal regimes of the Twentieth Century: Stalinism and Nazism. Its critics have denied that this concept can be applied to the period of government of Stalin in Soviet Union, with the justification that violence was necessary for the industrialization and progress of that country. We consider that the identities between National Socialism and Bolshevik Communism are much greater than their differences and therefore justify the use of the term “Totalitarianism” to allude to both regimes. In the end, the version discussed I the exposed by the Italian historian Enzo Traverso in his book “Totalitarianism”.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53805,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista de la Facultad de Derecho\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-07-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista de la Facultad de Derecho\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22187/RFD2018N45A14\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista de la Facultad de Derecho","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22187/RFD2018N45A14","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

本文旨在证明“极权主义”的概念是正确的,以指定20世纪最暴力和犯罪的政权:斯大林主义和纳粹主义。其批评者否认这一概念可以应用于苏联斯大林政府时期,并认为暴力是该国工业化和进步所必需的。我们认为,国家社会主义和布尔什维克共产主义之间的身份远大于它们的差异,因此使用“极权主义”一词来暗指这两个政权是合理的。最后,对意大利历史学家恩佐·特拉弗斯在《极权主义》一书中揭露的内容进行了论述。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Una reflexión sobre el concepto de totalitarismo
This paper aims to justify the concept of “Totalitarianism” to designate the most violent and criminal regimes of the Twentieth Century: Stalinism and Nazism. Its critics have denied that this concept can be applied to the period of government of Stalin in Soviet Union, with the justification that violence was necessary for the industrialization and progress of that country. We consider that the identities between National Socialism and Bolshevik Communism are much greater than their differences and therefore justify the use of the term “Totalitarianism” to allude to both regimes. In the end, the version discussed I the exposed by the Italian historian Enzo Traverso in his book “Totalitarianism”.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
El Acceso de la Administración Tributaria a la Información Bancaria en Honduras Estudio de la Figura del Holding, su desarrollo en Latinoamérica y presencia en Honduras Reflexiones en torno a la Proporcionalidad y Ponderación de Derechos Aplicados al Caso Artavia Murillo y otros (Fecundación In Vitro) Vs. Costa Rica Derechos Humanos: Coercibilidad de tratados, Educación, Estado de Derecho y Democracia RETROACTIVIDAD DE LA LEY PENAL MAS FAVORABLE (En Honduras una cuestión de justicia constitucional)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1