散居者的立场,祖国的棱镜:代表散居在祖国的散居者作为国家认同的内部谈判

IF 0.2 Q4 DEMOGRAPHY Diaspora Studies Pub Date : 2020-01-02 DOI:10.1080/09739572.2019.1685815
Omri Asscher, Ofer Shiff
{"title":"散居者的立场,祖国的棱镜:代表散居在祖国的散居者作为国家认同的内部谈判","authors":"Omri Asscher, Ofer Shiff","doi":"10.1080/09739572.2019.1685815","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This paper suggests that images and stances associated with the diaspora in the homeland culture offer a unique prism through which internal tensions in homeland collective identity may be dissected and understood. We believe it is worthwhile to broaden the spectrum of inquiry of recent research on quantifiable diaspora economic and political involvement in homeland nation-states to the inherently fluid, abstract realm of cultural representation. The paper implements this research orientation by offering a preliminary discussion of homeland-construed representations and stances of the diaspora, based on the case study of Israel. Israel is a particularly useful case for our purposes because of the degree to which the diaspora serves as a ‘significant other’ for the homeland national culture. Our claim is that two main prisms, or frames of reference, which we label as ‘minority stance’ and ‘authenticity,’ designate Israeli views of its diaspora that prove fundamental to Israeli national self-definition. The degree of authenticity ascribed in Israeli culture to representations and practices associated with the diaspora is contingent on the positive or negative value attributed to them as embodying a ‘minority stance,’ that is, to the diaspora giving central importance to its environing host society in its own identity and self-understanding. Using Greek culture as a comparative point of reference, we suggest that these prisms may be but two examples of various homeland ‘filters’ on the diaspora experience – filters which pertain to the homeland society’s ongoing internal negotiations of identity and symbolic boundary-work.","PeriodicalId":42341,"journal":{"name":"Diaspora Studies","volume":"13 1","pages":"1 - 15"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/09739572.2019.1685815","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Diasporic stances, homeland prisms: representing diaspora in the homeland as internal negotiation of national identity\",\"authors\":\"Omri Asscher, Ofer Shiff\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/09739572.2019.1685815\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT This paper suggests that images and stances associated with the diaspora in the homeland culture offer a unique prism through which internal tensions in homeland collective identity may be dissected and understood. We believe it is worthwhile to broaden the spectrum of inquiry of recent research on quantifiable diaspora economic and political involvement in homeland nation-states to the inherently fluid, abstract realm of cultural representation. The paper implements this research orientation by offering a preliminary discussion of homeland-construed representations and stances of the diaspora, based on the case study of Israel. Israel is a particularly useful case for our purposes because of the degree to which the diaspora serves as a ‘significant other’ for the homeland national culture. Our claim is that two main prisms, or frames of reference, which we label as ‘minority stance’ and ‘authenticity,’ designate Israeli views of its diaspora that prove fundamental to Israeli national self-definition. The degree of authenticity ascribed in Israeli culture to representations and practices associated with the diaspora is contingent on the positive or negative value attributed to them as embodying a ‘minority stance,’ that is, to the diaspora giving central importance to its environing host society in its own identity and self-understanding. Using Greek culture as a comparative point of reference, we suggest that these prisms may be but two examples of various homeland ‘filters’ on the diaspora experience – filters which pertain to the homeland society’s ongoing internal negotiations of identity and symbolic boundary-work.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42341,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Diaspora Studies\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"1 - 15\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/09739572.2019.1685815\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Diaspora Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/09739572.2019.1685815\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"DEMOGRAPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diaspora Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09739572.2019.1685815","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"DEMOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

摘要本文认为,在本土文化中与散居者相关的图像和立场提供了一个独特的棱镜,通过它可以剖析和理解本土集体身份中的内部紧张关系。我们认为,有必要将最近关于可量化的海外侨民在祖国国家的经济和政治参与的研究范围扩大到固有的流动、抽象的文化代表领域。本文在以色列案例研究的基础上,通过对散居国外者的本土理解表征和立场进行初步讨论,实现了这一研究方向。以色列对我们来说是一个特别有用的例子,因为散居国外的人在多大程度上是祖国民族文化的“重要他者”。我们的主张是,两个主要的棱镜或参照系,我们称之为“少数民族立场”和“真实性”,指定了以色列对其侨民的看法,这被证明是以色列民族自我定义的基础。在以色列文化中,与侨民有关的表现和做法的真实性程度取决于他们体现“少数群体立场”的积极或消极价值,也就是说,侨民在自己的身份和自我理解中对周围的东道国社会给予了中心重要。以希腊文化为比较参考点,我们认为这些棱镜可能只是散居国外经历中各种本土“过滤器”的两个例子——这些过滤器与本土社会正在进行的身份和象征性边界工作的内部谈判有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Diasporic stances, homeland prisms: representing diaspora in the homeland as internal negotiation of national identity
ABSTRACT This paper suggests that images and stances associated with the diaspora in the homeland culture offer a unique prism through which internal tensions in homeland collective identity may be dissected and understood. We believe it is worthwhile to broaden the spectrum of inquiry of recent research on quantifiable diaspora economic and political involvement in homeland nation-states to the inherently fluid, abstract realm of cultural representation. The paper implements this research orientation by offering a preliminary discussion of homeland-construed representations and stances of the diaspora, based on the case study of Israel. Israel is a particularly useful case for our purposes because of the degree to which the diaspora serves as a ‘significant other’ for the homeland national culture. Our claim is that two main prisms, or frames of reference, which we label as ‘minority stance’ and ‘authenticity,’ designate Israeli views of its diaspora that prove fundamental to Israeli national self-definition. The degree of authenticity ascribed in Israeli culture to representations and practices associated with the diaspora is contingent on the positive or negative value attributed to them as embodying a ‘minority stance,’ that is, to the diaspora giving central importance to its environing host society in its own identity and self-understanding. Using Greek culture as a comparative point of reference, we suggest that these prisms may be but two examples of various homeland ‘filters’ on the diaspora experience – filters which pertain to the homeland society’s ongoing internal negotiations of identity and symbolic boundary-work.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Diaspora Studies
Diaspora Studies DEMOGRAPHY-
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
10.00%
发文量
18
期刊介绍: Diaspora Studies is the interdisciplinary journal of the Organisation for Diaspora Initiatives (ODI) and is dedicated to publishing academic research on traditional diasporas and international migrants from the perspective of international relations, economics, politics, identity and history. The journal focuses specifically on diasporas and migrants as resources for both home and host countries. The scope of the journal includes the role of diasporas and international migration as important drivers in international relations, in development, and within civil societies. The journal welcomes theoretical and empirical contributions on comparative diasporas and state engagement policies, and aims to further scholarship and debate on emerging global networks and transnational identities. Diaspora Studies publishes: 1. Reviewed research papers 2. Book reviews 3. Conference reports 4. Documents on diaspora policies
期刊最新文献
Going Back to Pre-conflict Identities: The Cypriot Diaspora in the United Kingdom The Imagined Home within the Cham Muslim Diaspora in Cambodia Trapped in Time and Place: Cognitive Immobility among Diaspora Communities ‘We Still Exist’: The Social Suffering and Social Movement of Singkhon, the Siamese Diaspora Living on the Thai-Myanmar Border ‘It was painful then, but I can laugh about it now’: Lived Experiences of First-year Immigrant Teachers from African Countries Working in Florida Public Schools
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1