{"title":"外墙系统的选择与MCDM的决策","authors":"Anđelka Štilić, Igor Štilić","doi":"10.47982/jfde.2022.1.01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the field of construction practice, decisions regarding material selection frequently comedown to a choice based on tradition, i.e. recommendations based on the experience of theengineers hired by an employer as designers, contractors, or energy efficiency engineers.In the presented research, in addition to the Employer, technical individuals were involved inthe decision-making process. The harmonisation of Employer opinions and those of expertswere obtained through the NGT technique and Delphi based method, due to the fact that differentcriteria for a decision could represent a field of interest of an individual participant in theprocess. The result was determining the criteria, their strictness, and their weighted effect.As multi-criteria decision analysis has evolved into a powerful tool that assists decision-makersin generating \"a cut above\" choice in resolving specific cases and overcoming certain problemsin the architectural and construction industry, the use of the MCDM method EDAS+ in theresearch ensured an exterior wall system ranking that was not influenced by experience ormarketing.Without intending to favor any manufacturer of building materials, the research presents eightexterior wall systems belonging to different categories of core materials, all with individualfeatures, similarities, and differences.When compared to otherwise arbitrary estimates or recommendations based on experienceand the most commonly used building materials, the application of multi-criteria decisionanalysis in the case of exterior wall system selection for a particular 1938 Belgrade buildinggenerated more relevant selection results.","PeriodicalId":37451,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Facade Design and Engineering","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Selection of Exterior Wall System and MCDM Derived Decision\",\"authors\":\"Anđelka Štilić, Igor Štilić\",\"doi\":\"10.47982/jfde.2022.1.01\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In the field of construction practice, decisions regarding material selection frequently comedown to a choice based on tradition, i.e. recommendations based on the experience of theengineers hired by an employer as designers, contractors, or energy efficiency engineers.In the presented research, in addition to the Employer, technical individuals were involved inthe decision-making process. The harmonisation of Employer opinions and those of expertswere obtained through the NGT technique and Delphi based method, due to the fact that differentcriteria for a decision could represent a field of interest of an individual participant in theprocess. The result was determining the criteria, their strictness, and their weighted effect.As multi-criteria decision analysis has evolved into a powerful tool that assists decision-makersin generating \\\"a cut above\\\" choice in resolving specific cases and overcoming certain problemsin the architectural and construction industry, the use of the MCDM method EDAS+ in theresearch ensured an exterior wall system ranking that was not influenced by experience ormarketing.Without intending to favor any manufacturer of building materials, the research presents eightexterior wall systems belonging to different categories of core materials, all with individualfeatures, similarities, and differences.When compared to otherwise arbitrary estimates or recommendations based on experienceand the most commonly used building materials, the application of multi-criteria decisionanalysis in the case of exterior wall system selection for a particular 1938 Belgrade buildinggenerated more relevant selection results.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37451,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Facade Design and Engineering\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Facade Design and Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.47982/jfde.2022.1.01\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Engineering\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Facade Design and Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47982/jfde.2022.1.01","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
Selection of Exterior Wall System and MCDM Derived Decision
In the field of construction practice, decisions regarding material selection frequently comedown to a choice based on tradition, i.e. recommendations based on the experience of theengineers hired by an employer as designers, contractors, or energy efficiency engineers.In the presented research, in addition to the Employer, technical individuals were involved inthe decision-making process. The harmonisation of Employer opinions and those of expertswere obtained through the NGT technique and Delphi based method, due to the fact that differentcriteria for a decision could represent a field of interest of an individual participant in theprocess. The result was determining the criteria, their strictness, and their weighted effect.As multi-criteria decision analysis has evolved into a powerful tool that assists decision-makersin generating "a cut above" choice in resolving specific cases and overcoming certain problemsin the architectural and construction industry, the use of the MCDM method EDAS+ in theresearch ensured an exterior wall system ranking that was not influenced by experience ormarketing.Without intending to favor any manufacturer of building materials, the research presents eightexterior wall systems belonging to different categories of core materials, all with individualfeatures, similarities, and differences.When compared to otherwise arbitrary estimates or recommendations based on experienceand the most commonly used building materials, the application of multi-criteria decisionanalysis in the case of exterior wall system selection for a particular 1938 Belgrade buildinggenerated more relevant selection results.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Facade Design and Engineering presents new research results and new proven practice in the field of facade design and engineering. The goal is to improve building technologies, as well as process management and architectural design. This journal is a valuable resource for professionals and academics involved in the design and engineering of building envelopes, including the following disciplines: Architecture Façade Engineering Climate Design Building Services Integration Building Physics Façade Design and Construction Management Novel Material Applications. The journal will be directed at the scientific community, but it will also feature papers that focus on the dissemination of science into practice and industrial innovations. In this way, readers explore the interaction between scientific developments, technical considerations and management issues.