Cho Bernard Myungje, Bernard Senécal S.J. (Seo Myeonggweon)
{"title":"日本佛教现代主义与东成哲思想退翁性徹禪師 (1912–1993)","authors":"Cho Bernard Myungje, Bernard Senécal S.J. (Seo Myeonggweon)","doi":"10.1353/jkr.2021.0001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:Few scholars and followers of the Buddhist faith are aware of how much modern Japanese Buddhist studies have influenced Sŏn Master Toeong Seongcheol's thought. It is, indeed, a well-kept secret. However, as an instance, a close examination of Seongcheol's ideas on the Madhyamaka doctrine (chungdoron 中道論), and of his resulting interpretation of Chan-Sŏn 禪 history, reveals how strongly the scholarly position and the main arguments of Miyamoto Shoson 宮本正尊 influenced Seongcheol. This appears all too clearly when reading Chudo siso oyobi sono hattatsu 中道思想及びその發達 (Madhyamaka thought and its developments), Shoson's magnum opus. As a consequence of such Japanese influences, Seongcheol's Buddhist scholarship largely stems from a frame of reference defining all forms of Buddhism as sharing—and being reducible to—a fundamental, all-pervading, and ultimate essence. However, the one, entirely unified and interpenetrating system of thought, or so-called t'ongbulgyo 通佛敎, emerging from this frame and its resulting perspective render him incapable, not only of grasping the historical context in which the Madhyamika viewpoint he so unconditionally embraces was born, but also of seeing the problems and political implications its birth engendered. For that reason, Seongcheol's Madhyamaka ideology fails to avoid the pitfalls of fundamentalism, reductionism, and totalitarian tendencies, because it glosses over the multiple facets of Buddhism, and thus gives way to an unbalanced, oversimplified definition of it as the ''Religion of Awakening.''","PeriodicalId":42017,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Korean Religions","volume":"12 1","pages":"39 - 71"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1353/jkr.2021.0001","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Japanese Buddhist Modernism and the Thought of Sŏn Master Toeong Seongcheol 退翁性徹禪師 (1912–1993)\",\"authors\":\"Cho Bernard Myungje, Bernard Senécal S.J. (Seo Myeonggweon)\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/jkr.2021.0001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract:Few scholars and followers of the Buddhist faith are aware of how much modern Japanese Buddhist studies have influenced Sŏn Master Toeong Seongcheol's thought. It is, indeed, a well-kept secret. However, as an instance, a close examination of Seongcheol's ideas on the Madhyamaka doctrine (chungdoron 中道論), and of his resulting interpretation of Chan-Sŏn 禪 history, reveals how strongly the scholarly position and the main arguments of Miyamoto Shoson 宮本正尊 influenced Seongcheol. This appears all too clearly when reading Chudo siso oyobi sono hattatsu 中道思想及びその發達 (Madhyamaka thought and its developments), Shoson's magnum opus. As a consequence of such Japanese influences, Seongcheol's Buddhist scholarship largely stems from a frame of reference defining all forms of Buddhism as sharing—and being reducible to—a fundamental, all-pervading, and ultimate essence. However, the one, entirely unified and interpenetrating system of thought, or so-called t'ongbulgyo 通佛敎, emerging from this frame and its resulting perspective render him incapable, not only of grasping the historical context in which the Madhyamika viewpoint he so unconditionally embraces was born, but also of seeing the problems and political implications its birth engendered. For that reason, Seongcheol's Madhyamaka ideology fails to avoid the pitfalls of fundamentalism, reductionism, and totalitarian tendencies, because it glosses over the multiple facets of Buddhism, and thus gives way to an unbalanced, oversimplified definition of it as the ''Religion of Awakening.''\",\"PeriodicalId\":42017,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Korean Religions\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"39 - 71\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-05-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1353/jkr.2021.0001\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Korean Religions\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/jkr.2021.0001\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"ASIAN STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Korean Religions","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/jkr.2021.0001","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ASIAN STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
摘要:很少有学者和佛教信徒意识到现代日本佛教研究对东成哲的思想产生了多大的影响。事实上,这是一个保守得很好的秘密。然而,作为一个例子,仔细考察Seongcheol关于中央集权主义的思想(chungdoron中道論), 以及他对Chan-Sŏn的解释禪 历史,揭示了宫本将森的学术立场和主要论点宮本正尊 影响了承澈。这一点在阅读Chudo siso oyobi sono hattatsu时显得太清楚了中道思想及びその發達 (中央思想及其发展),肖森的代表作。由于日本的影响,Seongcheol的佛教学术在很大程度上源于一个参照系,该参照系将所有形式的佛教定义为共享——并可还原为——一种基本的、普遍的、终极的本质。然而,一个完全统一和相互渗透的思想体系,即所谓的汤通佛敎, 从这个框架及其产生的视角中走出来,使他不仅无法把握他无条件接受的中央集权观点诞生的历史背景,也无法看到其诞生所产生的问题和政治影响。因此,Seongcheol的中央派意识形态未能避免原教旨主义、还原主义和极权主义倾向的陷阱,因为它掩盖了佛教的多个方面,从而让位于将其定义为“觉醒宗教”的不平衡、过于简单化
Japanese Buddhist Modernism and the Thought of Sŏn Master Toeong Seongcheol 退翁性徹禪師 (1912–1993)
Abstract:Few scholars and followers of the Buddhist faith are aware of how much modern Japanese Buddhist studies have influenced Sŏn Master Toeong Seongcheol's thought. It is, indeed, a well-kept secret. However, as an instance, a close examination of Seongcheol's ideas on the Madhyamaka doctrine (chungdoron 中道論), and of his resulting interpretation of Chan-Sŏn 禪 history, reveals how strongly the scholarly position and the main arguments of Miyamoto Shoson 宮本正尊 influenced Seongcheol. This appears all too clearly when reading Chudo siso oyobi sono hattatsu 中道思想及びその發達 (Madhyamaka thought and its developments), Shoson's magnum opus. As a consequence of such Japanese influences, Seongcheol's Buddhist scholarship largely stems from a frame of reference defining all forms of Buddhism as sharing—and being reducible to—a fundamental, all-pervading, and ultimate essence. However, the one, entirely unified and interpenetrating system of thought, or so-called t'ongbulgyo 通佛敎, emerging from this frame and its resulting perspective render him incapable, not only of grasping the historical context in which the Madhyamika viewpoint he so unconditionally embraces was born, but also of seeing the problems and political implications its birth engendered. For that reason, Seongcheol's Madhyamaka ideology fails to avoid the pitfalls of fundamentalism, reductionism, and totalitarian tendencies, because it glosses over the multiple facets of Buddhism, and thus gives way to an unbalanced, oversimplified definition of it as the ''Religion of Awakening.''