暴力(非)劳动:论卡罗拉·迪贝尔《唯一的人》中克隆人的社会再生产

IF 0.1 4区 社会学 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY CANADIAN REVIEW OF AMERICAN STUDIES Pub Date : 2019-11-14 DOI:10.3138/cras.2018.022
B. Bellamy
{"title":"暴力(非)劳动:论卡罗拉·迪贝尔《唯一的人》中克隆人的社会再生产","authors":"B. Bellamy","doi":"10.3138/cras.2018.022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In a reading of Carola Dibbell’s debut novel The Only Ones (2015), this article deploys the term “(non-)labour” in two senses: one is a cheeky description of cloning as the activity of reproducing human beings without the traditional sense of labour as delivery of an infant, and the other draws on Marxist-feminist accounts of care work as the remunerated or unremunerated, though structurally necessary, labour required to reproduce the workforce. Dibbell’s novel presents a version of the human as a worker always already embedded in social relations, revealing the violence that thoroughly saturates the biomedical industry. Yet, as this article argues, violent labour is most evident when characters do work that has too long been imagined outside the sphere of value production. The Only Ones illustrates the impossibility of producing value without labour, violent or otherwise; it directs readers to the unlikely places where we already give away our work for free.","PeriodicalId":53953,"journal":{"name":"CANADIAN REVIEW OF AMERICAN STUDIES","volume":" ","pages":"-"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Violent (Non-) Labour: On the Social Reproduction of the Clone in Carola Dibbell’s The Only Ones\",\"authors\":\"B. Bellamy\",\"doi\":\"10.3138/cras.2018.022\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In a reading of Carola Dibbell’s debut novel The Only Ones (2015), this article deploys the term “(non-)labour” in two senses: one is a cheeky description of cloning as the activity of reproducing human beings without the traditional sense of labour as delivery of an infant, and the other draws on Marxist-feminist accounts of care work as the remunerated or unremunerated, though structurally necessary, labour required to reproduce the workforce. Dibbell’s novel presents a version of the human as a worker always already embedded in social relations, revealing the violence that thoroughly saturates the biomedical industry. Yet, as this article argues, violent labour is most evident when characters do work that has too long been imagined outside the sphere of value production. The Only Ones illustrates the impossibility of producing value without labour, violent or otherwise; it directs readers to the unlikely places where we already give away our work for free.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53953,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"CANADIAN REVIEW OF AMERICAN STUDIES\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"-\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-11-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"CANADIAN REVIEW OF AMERICAN STUDIES\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3138/cras.2018.022\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CANADIAN REVIEW OF AMERICAN STUDIES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3138/cras.2018.022","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在阅读卡罗拉·迪贝尔的处女作《唯一的人》(2015)时,本文从两个意义上使用了“(非)劳动”一词:一个是厚颜无耻地将克隆描述为复制人类的活动,而没有传统意义上的劳动,即分娩婴儿,尽管在结构上是必要的,但复制劳动力所需的劳动力。迪贝尔的小说呈现了一个一直嵌入社会关系中的人作为工人的版本,揭示了彻底充斥着生物医学行业的暴力。然而,正如这篇文章所说,当角色在价值生产领域之外从事长期想象的工作时,暴力劳动最为明显。《唯一的人》说明了没有暴力或其他劳动就不可能产生价值;它将读者引导到我们已经免费赠送作品的不太可能的地方。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Violent (Non-) Labour: On the Social Reproduction of the Clone in Carola Dibbell’s The Only Ones
In a reading of Carola Dibbell’s debut novel The Only Ones (2015), this article deploys the term “(non-)labour” in two senses: one is a cheeky description of cloning as the activity of reproducing human beings without the traditional sense of labour as delivery of an infant, and the other draws on Marxist-feminist accounts of care work as the remunerated or unremunerated, though structurally necessary, labour required to reproduce the workforce. Dibbell’s novel presents a version of the human as a worker always already embedded in social relations, revealing the violence that thoroughly saturates the biomedical industry. Yet, as this article argues, violent labour is most evident when characters do work that has too long been imagined outside the sphere of value production. The Only Ones illustrates the impossibility of producing value without labour, violent or otherwise; it directs readers to the unlikely places where we already give away our work for free.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CANADIAN REVIEW OF AMERICAN STUDIES
CANADIAN REVIEW OF AMERICAN STUDIES HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
期刊最新文献
Why Are Public Attitudes towards Immigration in Canada Becoming Increasingly Positive? Exploring the Factors behind the Changes in Attitudes towards Immigration (1998–2021) The Spectacle and Reification of Game of Thrones Ecology, Natural History, and Ecospatiality in American Literature Missing the Boat: Narrative Artistry in Hawthorne’s “My Kinsman, Major Molineux” and James’s The Ambassadors “The American Sentence”
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1