话语标记确实,事实上,确实,实际上,以及它们在西班牙经济中的等价物

IF 0.3 N/A LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS Revista de Linguistica y Lenguas Aplicadas Pub Date : 2021-07-08 DOI:10.4995/RLYLA.2021.14397
Francisco Alonso Almeida, Francisco J. Álvarez-Gil
{"title":"话语标记确实,事实上,确实,实际上,以及它们在西班牙经济中的等价物","authors":"Francisco Alonso Almeida, Francisco J. Álvarez-Gil","doi":"10.4995/RLYLA.2021.14397","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article explores the translation procedures followed in the rendering of the adverbials indeed, in fact, really and actually in a parallel corpus of English texts and their Spanish counterparts in the field of economy. While the adverbials mentioned are all categorized as boosters according to Hyland’s classification of metadiscourse markers (2005) in the source corpus, their Spanish correspondents may fall within other such metadiscourse categories as attitude and hedging markers, for example. The study of these variants contributes to our understanding of the processes involved in the translation of these markers, which seem to correspond to an intention of the translators to provide adequate translated versions so that these texts read as naturally in the target language as possible. Our methodology of inquiry involves corpus linguistics tools in order to interrogate a parallel corpus and retrieve cases of the adverbials indeed, in fact, really and actually. Our approach to discourse markers includes Schiffrin (1987), Fraser (1996), Jucker & Ziv (1998), Aijmer (2002), and especially Buysse (2012), Ghezzi (2014), Carrió-Pastor (2016a, 2016b), and Furkó (2020). Our notion of metadiscourse follows Hyland (2005) from where we have also taken the taxonomy of metadiscourse markers used in the analysis of data to classify findings.  The identification and the classification of the translation procedures rely on Cruz-García (2014). Conclusions report on the most frequent translations procedures and the commonest Spanish forms used to translate the adverbial analysed, including their metadiscourse functions.","PeriodicalId":42090,"journal":{"name":"Revista de Linguistica y Lenguas Aplicadas","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The discourse markers indeed, in fact, really and actually and their Spanish equivalents in economy\",\"authors\":\"Francisco Alonso Almeida, Francisco J. Álvarez-Gil\",\"doi\":\"10.4995/RLYLA.2021.14397\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article explores the translation procedures followed in the rendering of the adverbials indeed, in fact, really and actually in a parallel corpus of English texts and their Spanish counterparts in the field of economy. While the adverbials mentioned are all categorized as boosters according to Hyland’s classification of metadiscourse markers (2005) in the source corpus, their Spanish correspondents may fall within other such metadiscourse categories as attitude and hedging markers, for example. The study of these variants contributes to our understanding of the processes involved in the translation of these markers, which seem to correspond to an intention of the translators to provide adequate translated versions so that these texts read as naturally in the target language as possible. Our methodology of inquiry involves corpus linguistics tools in order to interrogate a parallel corpus and retrieve cases of the adverbials indeed, in fact, really and actually. Our approach to discourse markers includes Schiffrin (1987), Fraser (1996), Jucker & Ziv (1998), Aijmer (2002), and especially Buysse (2012), Ghezzi (2014), Carrió-Pastor (2016a, 2016b), and Furkó (2020). Our notion of metadiscourse follows Hyland (2005) from where we have also taken the taxonomy of metadiscourse markers used in the analysis of data to classify findings.  The identification and the classification of the translation procedures rely on Cruz-García (2014). Conclusions report on the most frequent translations procedures and the commonest Spanish forms used to translate the adverbial analysed, including their metadiscourse functions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42090,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista de Linguistica y Lenguas Aplicadas\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista de Linguistica y Lenguas Aplicadas\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4995/RLYLA.2021.14397\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"N/A\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista de Linguistica y Lenguas Aplicadas","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4995/RLYLA.2021.14397","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"N/A","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本文探讨了在经济领域中,在英语文本和西班牙语文本的平行语料库中,状语的翻译过程。虽然根据Hyland对源语料库中元话语标记的分类(2005),所提到的状语都被归类为助推词,但它们的西班牙语对应词可能属于其他元话语类别,例如态度和对冲标记。对这些变体的研究有助于我们理解这些标记的翻译过程,这似乎符合译者的意图,即提供足够的翻译版本,使这些文本在目标语言中尽可能自然地阅读。我们的探究方法涉及语料库语言学工具,以便对平行语料库进行探究,并检索状语的情况——事实上,事实上。我们对话语标记的研究方法包括Schiffrin(1987)、Fraser(1996)、Jucker和Ziv(1998)、Aijmer(2002),尤其是Buysse(2012)、Ghezzi(2014)、Carrió-Postor(2016a、2016b)和Furkó(2020)。我们对元话语的概念遵循Hyland(2005)的观点,在那里我们还采用了数据分析中使用的元话语标记的分类法来对发现进行分类。翻译程序的识别和分类依赖于Cruz García(2014)。结论报告了最常见的翻译程序和最常见的西班牙语形式,包括它们的元话语功能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The discourse markers indeed, in fact, really and actually and their Spanish equivalents in economy
This article explores the translation procedures followed in the rendering of the adverbials indeed, in fact, really and actually in a parallel corpus of English texts and their Spanish counterparts in the field of economy. While the adverbials mentioned are all categorized as boosters according to Hyland’s classification of metadiscourse markers (2005) in the source corpus, their Spanish correspondents may fall within other such metadiscourse categories as attitude and hedging markers, for example. The study of these variants contributes to our understanding of the processes involved in the translation of these markers, which seem to correspond to an intention of the translators to provide adequate translated versions so that these texts read as naturally in the target language as possible. Our methodology of inquiry involves corpus linguistics tools in order to interrogate a parallel corpus and retrieve cases of the adverbials indeed, in fact, really and actually. Our approach to discourse markers includes Schiffrin (1987), Fraser (1996), Jucker & Ziv (1998), Aijmer (2002), and especially Buysse (2012), Ghezzi (2014), Carrió-Pastor (2016a, 2016b), and Furkó (2020). Our notion of metadiscourse follows Hyland (2005) from where we have also taken the taxonomy of metadiscourse markers used in the analysis of data to classify findings.  The identification and the classification of the translation procedures rely on Cruz-García (2014). Conclusions report on the most frequent translations procedures and the commonest Spanish forms used to translate the adverbial analysed, including their metadiscourse functions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
25.00%
发文量
11
审稿时长
30 weeks
期刊介绍: The Revista de Lingüística y Lenguas Aplicadas aims to contribute to thedissemination of scholarly research in the field of language study, especially thatof specialised languages. Whether from a theoretical or a practical perspective,contributions discussing any of the following areas are of particular interest: Discourse Analysis Language Teaching Terminology and Translation Languages for Specific Purposes (LSP) Computer-Assisted Language Learning (CALL) Its a peer-review yearly journal of linguistic studies, designed to target an international readership and to contribute to the promotion of knowledge regarding applied linguistics.
期刊最新文献
Procesos de patrimonialización y creación de la identidad nacional El Aktionsart de pacientes con Alzhéimer: un análisis de corpus desde la Gramática del Papel y la Referencia Mapping the mental lexicon of EFL learners On experimental lexical production in Spanish as L1 and L2. Book review: Álvarez-Gil, F. J. (2022). Stance devices in tourism-related research articles: A corpus-based study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1