金砖国家发电来源与二氧化碳排放:静态和动态面板回归

Liton Chandra Voumik, Md. Shaddam Hossain, M. Islam, A. Rahaman
{"title":"金砖国家发电来源与二氧化碳排放:静态和动态面板回归","authors":"Liton Chandra Voumik, Md. Shaddam Hossain, M. Islam, A. Rahaman","doi":"10.13052/spee1048-5236.4143","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: The threat of global warming has escalated as a result of industrialization, urbanization, population growth, and lifestyle changes in Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa (BRICS). The amount of electricity generated by various sources is directly influenced by their respective carbon dioxide (CO2 \n) emissions. This study’s primary goal is to determine which sources are bad for the environment and which are not. \nMethodology: Examining the impact of different energy generation sources on CO2 \nemissions using data from the BRICS. To analyze the data, pooled OLS and Generalized Method of Moments (GMM) are used, as well as Quantile Regression (QR). \nFindings: We found that coal and gas power generation had a positive and large influence on CO2 \nemissions regardless of the method used. As compared to other emissions, coal-fired energy production has a more significant impact. In all regression models, hydroelectric and renewable energy generation can reduce CO2 \nemissions. \nOriginality: Identifying an empirical link between CO2 \nemissions and energy production sources is the study’s most significant accomplishment. To obtain solid results, the paper used a combination of QR and GMM techniques. The conclusions presented in this article have important environmental policy consequences. CO2 emissions can be reduced by reducing the consumption of fossil fuels and promoting the development of alternative energy sources such as hydroelectric, wind, and solar power.","PeriodicalId":35712,"journal":{"name":"Strategic Planning for Energy and the Environment","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"17","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Power Generation Sources and Carbon Dioxide Emissions in BRICS Countries: Static and Dynamic Panel Regression\",\"authors\":\"Liton Chandra Voumik, Md. Shaddam Hossain, M. Islam, A. Rahaman\",\"doi\":\"10.13052/spee1048-5236.4143\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose: The threat of global warming has escalated as a result of industrialization, urbanization, population growth, and lifestyle changes in Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa (BRICS). The amount of electricity generated by various sources is directly influenced by their respective carbon dioxide (CO2 \\n) emissions. This study’s primary goal is to determine which sources are bad for the environment and which are not. \\nMethodology: Examining the impact of different energy generation sources on CO2 \\nemissions using data from the BRICS. To analyze the data, pooled OLS and Generalized Method of Moments (GMM) are used, as well as Quantile Regression (QR). \\nFindings: We found that coal and gas power generation had a positive and large influence on CO2 \\nemissions regardless of the method used. As compared to other emissions, coal-fired energy production has a more significant impact. In all regression models, hydroelectric and renewable energy generation can reduce CO2 \\nemissions. \\nOriginality: Identifying an empirical link between CO2 \\nemissions and energy production sources is the study’s most significant accomplishment. To obtain solid results, the paper used a combination of QR and GMM techniques. The conclusions presented in this article have important environmental policy consequences. CO2 emissions can be reduced by reducing the consumption of fossil fuels and promoting the development of alternative energy sources such as hydroelectric, wind, and solar power.\",\"PeriodicalId\":35712,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Strategic Planning for Energy and the Environment\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"17\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Strategic Planning for Energy and the Environment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.13052/spee1048-5236.4143\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Environmental Science\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Strategic Planning for Energy and the Environment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13052/spee1048-5236.4143","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Environmental Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 17

摘要

目的:由于巴西、俄罗斯、印度、中国和南非(金砖国家)的工业化、城市化、人口增长和生活方式的改变,全球变暖的威胁已经升级。各种来源产生的电量直接受到其各自二氧化碳(CO2)排放量的影响。这项研究的主要目标是确定哪些来源对环境有害,哪些不是。方法:利用金砖国家的数据研究不同能源发电来源对二氧化碳排放的影响。为了分析数据,使用了混合OLS和广义矩量法(GMM)以及分位数回归(QR)。研究结果:我们发现,无论使用何种方法,煤炭和天然气发电都会对二氧化碳排放产生积极而巨大的影响。与其他排放相比,燃煤能源生产的影响更为显著。在所有回归模型中,水力发电和可再生能源发电可以减少二氧化碳排放。独创性:确定二氧化碳排放和能源生产来源之间的经验联系是该研究最重要的成就。为了获得可靠的结果,本文结合了QR和GMM技术。本文提出的结论具有重要的环境政策后果。可以通过减少化石燃料的消耗和促进水电、风能和太阳能等替代能源的开发来减少二氧化碳排放。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Power Generation Sources and Carbon Dioxide Emissions in BRICS Countries: Static and Dynamic Panel Regression
Purpose: The threat of global warming has escalated as a result of industrialization, urbanization, population growth, and lifestyle changes in Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa (BRICS). The amount of electricity generated by various sources is directly influenced by their respective carbon dioxide (CO2 ) emissions. This study’s primary goal is to determine which sources are bad for the environment and which are not. Methodology: Examining the impact of different energy generation sources on CO2 emissions using data from the BRICS. To analyze the data, pooled OLS and Generalized Method of Moments (GMM) are used, as well as Quantile Regression (QR). Findings: We found that coal and gas power generation had a positive and large influence on CO2 emissions regardless of the method used. As compared to other emissions, coal-fired energy production has a more significant impact. In all regression models, hydroelectric and renewable energy generation can reduce CO2 emissions. Originality: Identifying an empirical link between CO2 emissions and energy production sources is the study’s most significant accomplishment. To obtain solid results, the paper used a combination of QR and GMM techniques. The conclusions presented in this article have important environmental policy consequences. CO2 emissions can be reduced by reducing the consumption of fossil fuels and promoting the development of alternative energy sources such as hydroelectric, wind, and solar power.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Strategic Planning for Energy and the Environment
Strategic Planning for Energy and the Environment Environmental Science-Environmental Science (all)
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
期刊最新文献
Application of Digital Economy Machine Learning Algorithm for Predicting Carbon Trading Prices Under Carbon Reduction Trends Low-Carbon Economic Dispatch of Integrated Energy Systems in Multi-Form Energy-intensive Parks Based on the ICT-GRU Prediction Model Installation Technique and Numerical Simulation of Stress on High-Pile Footings During the Translation of Offshore Booster Stations Analysis of the Factors Affecting the Logistics Efficiency of Urban Farm Products in the Context of Low-carbon Economy The Relationship Between Green Finance, Sustainable Technological Innovation and Energy Efficiency
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1