使用不同的粘接剂,3D打印的永久树脂和研磨的氧化锆与乳牙的剪切结合强度。

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE American journal of dentistry Pub Date : 2023-10-01
Nazli Aydin, Hacer N Uguz
{"title":"使用不同的粘接剂,3D打印的永久树脂和研磨的氧化锆与乳牙的剪切结合强度。","authors":"Nazli Aydin,&nbsp;Hacer N Uguz","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the shear bond strengths (SBS) of permanent 3D-printed resin (PR) to primary dentin using different luting agents.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>90 primary teeth were prepared. 45 cylinders (3 x 3 mm) were printed using PR, and 45 cylinders were milled using a Z block (to control). The cylinders were bonded to primary dentin by using three types of luting agent [glass-ionomer cement (GIC), resin-modified glass-ionomer cement (RMGIC), and self-adhesive resin cement (SRC)]. The SBS values of the specimens were calculated, and the fracture modes were examined.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was a statistically significant difference between the three different luting agents that were used to lute the PR to primary dentin (P< 0.001). Changing the material (PR or Z) did not affect the SBS values of the luting agents (P> 0.05). The adhesive failure between cement and dentin in the PR-SRC group was significantly higher than the other groups (P< 0.001). The SBS values of the newly developed PR to primary dentin with RMGIC and SRC were similar, but GIC showed lower values than the others.</p><p><strong>Clinical significance: </strong>This laboratory study suggests that bond strength of the permanent 3D-printed resin can be like that of zirconia. As the resin-modified glass-ionomer cement and self-adhesive resin cement showed higher bond strength to primary teeth making the 3D-printed resin a treatment option.</p>","PeriodicalId":7538,"journal":{"name":"American journal of dentistry","volume":"36 5","pages":"239-245"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Shear bond strength of permanent 3D-printed resin and milled zirconia to primary teeth using different luting agents.\",\"authors\":\"Nazli Aydin,&nbsp;Hacer N Uguz\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the shear bond strengths (SBS) of permanent 3D-printed resin (PR) to primary dentin using different luting agents.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>90 primary teeth were prepared. 45 cylinders (3 x 3 mm) were printed using PR, and 45 cylinders were milled using a Z block (to control). The cylinders were bonded to primary dentin by using three types of luting agent [glass-ionomer cement (GIC), resin-modified glass-ionomer cement (RMGIC), and self-adhesive resin cement (SRC)]. The SBS values of the specimens were calculated, and the fracture modes were examined.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was a statistically significant difference between the three different luting agents that were used to lute the PR to primary dentin (P< 0.001). Changing the material (PR or Z) did not affect the SBS values of the luting agents (P> 0.05). The adhesive failure between cement and dentin in the PR-SRC group was significantly higher than the other groups (P< 0.001). The SBS values of the newly developed PR to primary dentin with RMGIC and SRC were similar, but GIC showed lower values than the others.</p><p><strong>Clinical significance: </strong>This laboratory study suggests that bond strength of the permanent 3D-printed resin can be like that of zirconia. As the resin-modified glass-ionomer cement and self-adhesive resin cement showed higher bond strength to primary teeth making the 3D-printed resin a treatment option.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7538,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American journal of dentistry\",\"volume\":\"36 5\",\"pages\":\"239-245\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American journal of dentistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评价不同粘接剂对永久性3D打印树脂(PR)与原代牙本质的剪切结合强度(SBS)。方法:预备90颗乳牙。使用PR印刷45个圆柱体(3 x 3 mm),并使用Z块研磨45个圆柱体。通过使用三种类型的粘合剂[玻璃离聚物水泥(GIC)、树脂改性玻璃离聚体水泥(RMGIC)和自粘树脂水泥(SRC)]将圆柱体粘合到原发性牙本质上。计算了试样的SBS值,并对其断裂模式进行了检测。结果:三种不同的粘接剂对原发性牙本质PR的粘接效果差异有统计学意义(P<0.001)。改变材料(PR或Z)对粘接剂的SBS值无影响(P>0.05)。PR-SRC组的粘固剂与牙本质的粘接失败率显著高于其他组(P<0.01)RMGIC和SRC对原发性牙本质新形成的PR相似,但GIC的值低于其他组。临床意义:这项实验室研究表明,永久性3D打印树脂的结合强度可以像氧化锆一样。由于树脂改性的玻璃离聚物水泥和自粘树脂水泥对乳牙表现出更高的粘结强度,因此3D打印树脂是一种治疗选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Shear bond strength of permanent 3D-printed resin and milled zirconia to primary teeth using different luting agents.

Purpose: To evaluate the shear bond strengths (SBS) of permanent 3D-printed resin (PR) to primary dentin using different luting agents.

Methods: 90 primary teeth were prepared. 45 cylinders (3 x 3 mm) were printed using PR, and 45 cylinders were milled using a Z block (to control). The cylinders were bonded to primary dentin by using three types of luting agent [glass-ionomer cement (GIC), resin-modified glass-ionomer cement (RMGIC), and self-adhesive resin cement (SRC)]. The SBS values of the specimens were calculated, and the fracture modes were examined.

Results: There was a statistically significant difference between the three different luting agents that were used to lute the PR to primary dentin (P< 0.001). Changing the material (PR or Z) did not affect the SBS values of the luting agents (P> 0.05). The adhesive failure between cement and dentin in the PR-SRC group was significantly higher than the other groups (P< 0.001). The SBS values of the newly developed PR to primary dentin with RMGIC and SRC were similar, but GIC showed lower values than the others.

Clinical significance: This laboratory study suggests that bond strength of the permanent 3D-printed resin can be like that of zirconia. As the resin-modified glass-ionomer cement and self-adhesive resin cement showed higher bond strength to primary teeth making the 3D-printed resin a treatment option.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
American journal of dentistry
American journal of dentistry 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
7.10%
发文量
57
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Dentistry, published by Mosher & Linder, Inc., provides peer-reviewed scientific articles with clinical significance for the general dental practitioner.
期刊最新文献
Two-year clinical performance of an alkasite direct restorative material in Class I and II cavities without using an adhesive resin: A prospective single-arm clinical trial. Assessment of correlation between the Modified Schirmer Test and unstimulated salivary flow testing. Biofilm attachment and mineralizing potential of contemporary restorative materials. Color match and stability of single-shade resin-based composites before and after artificial aging. Denture biofilm increases respiratory diseases in the elderly. A mini-review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1