跨学科利益相关者对抗菌药物耐药性的理解:新西兰奥特亚的一种综合方法。

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health Pub Date : 2023-10-16 DOI:10.1016/j.anzjph.2023.100093
Sarah Mitchell, Alexandra Macmillan, Kate C Morgaine, Patricia Priest
{"title":"跨学科利益相关者对抗菌药物耐药性的理解:新西兰奥特亚的一种综合方法。","authors":"Sarah Mitchell,&nbsp;Alexandra Macmillan,&nbsp;Kate C Morgaine,&nbsp;Patricia Priest","doi":"10.1016/j.anzjph.2023.100093","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a complex public health issue, with a range of influences across human, animal, and environmental health. Given the complexity of the problem, the diversity of stakeholders, and the failure of current policies to curb AMR worldwide, integrative approaches are needed to identify effective actions. Underpinned by systems thinking and One Health principles, this qualitative study explored how diverse AMR experts in Aotearoa New Zealand perceive the main drivers and effects of AMR.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Semi-structured interviews with clinical, academic, policy, community, and industry representatives were designed to elicit mental models of the causes and outcomes of AMR across dimensions.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Thematic analysis revealed contrasting understandings of AMR causes across four domains: food-producing animals (livestock), healthcare, community, and environment. AMR was often framed as a problem of individual behaviour, despite many implicit references to underlying structural economic influences. The politics of collaboration was a further major underlying theme. The interviews highlighted fundamental connections between AMR and other complex issues, including poverty and environmental pollution.</p></div><div><h3>Implications for public health</h3><p>This study brings together the understandings of AMR of transdisciplinary stakeholders, providing some immediate insights for policy makers and setting the foundation for developing a collaborative system model of AMR as a basis for decision-making.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8620,"journal":{"name":"Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health","volume":"47 6","pages":"Article 100093"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Transdisciplinary stakeholder understandings of antimicrobial resistance: An integrative approach in Aotearoa New Zealand\",\"authors\":\"Sarah Mitchell,&nbsp;Alexandra Macmillan,&nbsp;Kate C Morgaine,&nbsp;Patricia Priest\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.anzjph.2023.100093\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a complex public health issue, with a range of influences across human, animal, and environmental health. Given the complexity of the problem, the diversity of stakeholders, and the failure of current policies to curb AMR worldwide, integrative approaches are needed to identify effective actions. Underpinned by systems thinking and One Health principles, this qualitative study explored how diverse AMR experts in Aotearoa New Zealand perceive the main drivers and effects of AMR.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Semi-structured interviews with clinical, academic, policy, community, and industry representatives were designed to elicit mental models of the causes and outcomes of AMR across dimensions.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Thematic analysis revealed contrasting understandings of AMR causes across four domains: food-producing animals (livestock), healthcare, community, and environment. AMR was often framed as a problem of individual behaviour, despite many implicit references to underlying structural economic influences. The politics of collaboration was a further major underlying theme. The interviews highlighted fundamental connections between AMR and other complex issues, including poverty and environmental pollution.</p></div><div><h3>Implications for public health</h3><p>This study brings together the understandings of AMR of transdisciplinary stakeholders, providing some immediate insights for policy makers and setting the foundation for developing a collaborative system model of AMR as a basis for decision-making.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8620,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health\",\"volume\":\"47 6\",\"pages\":\"Article 100093\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1326020023052706\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1326020023052706","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:抗微生物耐药性(AMR)是一个复杂的公共卫生问题,对人类、动物和环境健康有一系列影响。考虑到问题的复杂性、利益相关者的多样性以及当前全球遏制AMR的政策的失败,需要采取综合方法来确定有效的行动。在系统思维和“一个健康”原则的支持下,这项定性研究探讨了新西兰奥特亚不同的AMR专家如何感知AMR的主要驱动因素和影响。方法:设计对临床、学术、政策、社区和行业代表的半结构化访谈,以引出AMR原因和结果的跨维度心理模型。结果:专题分析揭示了四个领域对AMR病因的不同理解:食品生产动物(牲畜)、医疗保健、社区和环境。AMR通常被认为是一个个人行为的问题,尽管许多人隐含地提到了潜在的结构性经济影响。合作政治是另一个重要的基本主题。采访强调了AMR与其他复杂问题之间的根本联系,包括贫困和环境污染。对公共卫生的影响:这项研究汇集了跨学科利益相关者对AMR的理解,为决策者提供了一些即时的见解,并为开发AMR的合作系统模型奠定了基础,作为决策的基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Transdisciplinary stakeholder understandings of antimicrobial resistance: An integrative approach in Aotearoa New Zealand

Objective

Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a complex public health issue, with a range of influences across human, animal, and environmental health. Given the complexity of the problem, the diversity of stakeholders, and the failure of current policies to curb AMR worldwide, integrative approaches are needed to identify effective actions. Underpinned by systems thinking and One Health principles, this qualitative study explored how diverse AMR experts in Aotearoa New Zealand perceive the main drivers and effects of AMR.

Methods

Semi-structured interviews with clinical, academic, policy, community, and industry representatives were designed to elicit mental models of the causes and outcomes of AMR across dimensions.

Results

Thematic analysis revealed contrasting understandings of AMR causes across four domains: food-producing animals (livestock), healthcare, community, and environment. AMR was often framed as a problem of individual behaviour, despite many implicit references to underlying structural economic influences. The politics of collaboration was a further major underlying theme. The interviews highlighted fundamental connections between AMR and other complex issues, including poverty and environmental pollution.

Implications for public health

This study brings together the understandings of AMR of transdisciplinary stakeholders, providing some immediate insights for policy makers and setting the foundation for developing a collaborative system model of AMR as a basis for decision-making.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health
Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
5.70%
发文量
121
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health (ANZJPH) is concerned with public health issues. The research reported includes formal epidemiological inquiries into the correlates and causes of diseases and health-related behaviour, analyses of public policy affecting health and disease, and detailed studies of the cultures and social structures within which health and illness exist. The Journal is multidisciplinary and aims to publish methodologically sound research from any of the academic disciplines that constitute public health.
期刊最新文献
Preliminary evaluation of a novel Aboriginal community-controlled prison health service for First Nations people. A cross-sectional study of the experiences of distressed callers when accessing financial assistance from a telephone-based cancer information and support service Increasing awareness of sexually transmitted infections (STI) testing and addressing stigma may improve STI testing in Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander youth: Evidence from the Next Generation Youth Wellbeing Study Psychedelic medicine and cultural responsiveness: A call for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander engagement in Australian clinical trials and practice An evaluation of the population uptake and contact tracer utilisation of the Covid-19 Bluetooth Exposure Notification Framework in New Zealand
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1