在特定场景暴露下,低估了基于活动的微塑料摄入量

IF 14 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Environmental Science and Ecotechnology Pub Date : 2023-09-15 DOI:10.1016/j.ese.2023.100316
Kai Liu , Qingqing Li , Anthony L. Andrady , Xiaohui Wang , Yinan He , Daoji Li
{"title":"在特定场景暴露下,低估了基于活动的微塑料摄入量","authors":"Kai Liu ,&nbsp;Qingqing Li ,&nbsp;Anthony L. Andrady ,&nbsp;Xiaohui Wang ,&nbsp;Yinan He ,&nbsp;Daoji Li","doi":"10.1016/j.ese.2023.100316","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Despite increasing alarms over the health impacts of microplastics (MPs) due to their detection in human organs and feces, precise exposure evaluations remain scarce. To comprehend their risks, there is a distinct need to prioritize quantitive estimates in MP exposome, particularly at the environmentally-realistic level. Here we used a method rooted in real-world MP measurements and activity patterns to determine the daily intake of MPs through inhalation and from ground dust/soil ingestion. We found that nearly 80% of this intake comes from residential sectors, with activity intensity and behavioral types significantly affecting the human MP burden. The data showed a peak in MP exposure for those aged 18–64. When compared to dietary MP intake sources like seafood, salt, and water, we identified a previously underestimated exposure from inhalation and dust/soil ingestion, emphasizing the need for more realistic evaluations that incorporate activity factors. This discovery raises questions about the accuracy of past studies and underscores MP's potential health risks. Moreover, our time-based simulations revealed increased MP intake during the COVID-19 lockdown due to more surface dust ingestion, shedding light on how global health crises may inadvertently elevate MP exposure risks.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":34434,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Science and Ecotechnology","volume":"18 ","pages":"Article 100316"},"PeriodicalIF":14.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/78/da/main.PMC10583090.pdf","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Underestimated activity-based microplastic intake under scenario-specific exposures\",\"authors\":\"Kai Liu ,&nbsp;Qingqing Li ,&nbsp;Anthony L. Andrady ,&nbsp;Xiaohui Wang ,&nbsp;Yinan He ,&nbsp;Daoji Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ese.2023.100316\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Despite increasing alarms over the health impacts of microplastics (MPs) due to their detection in human organs and feces, precise exposure evaluations remain scarce. To comprehend their risks, there is a distinct need to prioritize quantitive estimates in MP exposome, particularly at the environmentally-realistic level. Here we used a method rooted in real-world MP measurements and activity patterns to determine the daily intake of MPs through inhalation and from ground dust/soil ingestion. We found that nearly 80% of this intake comes from residential sectors, with activity intensity and behavioral types significantly affecting the human MP burden. The data showed a peak in MP exposure for those aged 18–64. When compared to dietary MP intake sources like seafood, salt, and water, we identified a previously underestimated exposure from inhalation and dust/soil ingestion, emphasizing the need for more realistic evaluations that incorporate activity factors. This discovery raises questions about the accuracy of past studies and underscores MP's potential health risks. Moreover, our time-based simulations revealed increased MP intake during the COVID-19 lockdown due to more surface dust ingestion, shedding light on how global health crises may inadvertently elevate MP exposure risks.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":34434,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental Science and Ecotechnology\",\"volume\":\"18 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100316\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":14.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/78/da/main.PMC10583090.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental Science and Ecotechnology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666498423000819\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Science and Ecotechnology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666498423000819","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

尽管由于在人体器官和粪便中检测到微塑料(MPs)对健康影响的警报越来越多,但精确的暴露评估仍然很少。为了了解它们的风险,特别需要优先考虑对多聚氰胺暴露量的定量估计,特别是在环境现实水平上。在这里,我们使用了一种基于真实世界MP测量和活动模式的方法来确定通过吸入和从地面灰尘/土壤摄入的MP的每日摄入量。我们发现,近80%的摄入来自住宅部门,活动强度和行为类型显著影响人类MP负担。数据显示,18-64岁年龄段的人接触多羟基磷灰石的频率最高。当与海鲜、盐和水等膳食MP摄入来源进行比较时,我们发现了先前被低估的吸入和灰尘/土壤摄入暴露,强调需要更现实的评估,包括活动因素。这一发现对过去研究的准确性提出了质疑,并强调了MP的潜在健康风险。此外,我们基于时间的模拟显示,在COVID-19封锁期间,由于更多的地表灰尘摄入,MP摄入量增加,这揭示了全球健康危机如何在无意中提高MP暴露风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Underestimated activity-based microplastic intake under scenario-specific exposures

Despite increasing alarms over the health impacts of microplastics (MPs) due to their detection in human organs and feces, precise exposure evaluations remain scarce. To comprehend their risks, there is a distinct need to prioritize quantitive estimates in MP exposome, particularly at the environmentally-realistic level. Here we used a method rooted in real-world MP measurements and activity patterns to determine the daily intake of MPs through inhalation and from ground dust/soil ingestion. We found that nearly 80% of this intake comes from residential sectors, with activity intensity and behavioral types significantly affecting the human MP burden. The data showed a peak in MP exposure for those aged 18–64. When compared to dietary MP intake sources like seafood, salt, and water, we identified a previously underestimated exposure from inhalation and dust/soil ingestion, emphasizing the need for more realistic evaluations that incorporate activity factors. This discovery raises questions about the accuracy of past studies and underscores MP's potential health risks. Moreover, our time-based simulations revealed increased MP intake during the COVID-19 lockdown due to more surface dust ingestion, shedding light on how global health crises may inadvertently elevate MP exposure risks.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
20.40
自引率
6.30%
发文量
11
审稿时长
18 days
期刊介绍: Environmental Science & Ecotechnology (ESE) is an international, open-access journal publishing original research in environmental science, engineering, ecotechnology, and related fields. Authors publishing in ESE can immediately, permanently, and freely share their work. They have license options and retain copyright. Published by Elsevier, ESE is co-organized by the Chinese Society for Environmental Sciences, Harbin Institute of Technology, and the Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences, under the supervision of the China Association for Science and Technology.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Accelerating the establishment of a new science-policy panel to address the triple planetary crisis Rapid identification of antibiotic resistance gene hosts by prescreening ARG-like reads Enhanced removal of chiral emerging contaminants by an electroactive biofilter Mitigating household air pollution exposure through kitchen renovation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1