季前跑步时的垂直重心位移和骨密度z评分是大学越野跑运动员骨应力损伤风险的危险因素。

IF 6 1区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy Pub Date : 2023-12-01 DOI:10.2519/jospt.2023.11860
Mikel R Joachim, Stephanie A Kliethermes, Bryan C Heiderscheit
{"title":"季前跑步时的垂直重心位移和骨密度z评分是大学越野跑运动员骨应力损伤风险的危险因素。","authors":"Mikel R Joachim, Stephanie A Kliethermes, Bryan C Heiderscheit","doi":"10.2519/jospt.2023.11860","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>OBJECTIVES:</b> To (1) assess relationships between running biomechanics, bone health, and bone stress injuries (BSIs), and (2) determine which variables constitute the most parsimonious BSI risk model among collegiate cross-country runners. <b>DESIGN:</b> Prospective, observational cohort study. <b>METHODS:</b> Running gait and bone mineral density (BMD) data from healthy collegiate cross-country runners were collected at preseason over 6 seasons. A generalized estimating equation model with backward selection was used to develop the most parsimonious model for estimating BSI risk, controlling for sex, running speed, and prior BSI. The variables assessed were spatiotemporal, ground reaction force, and joint kinematics, based on previous literature. Quasi-likelihood under the independence model criterion values and R<sup>2</sup> values were used to select the best-fitting model. <b>RESULTS:</b> Data from 103 runners were included in the analysis. The best-fitting model included vertical center of mass (COM) displacement and BMD z-score. Injury risk increased with greater vertical COM displacement (unit = 0.5 cm; relative risk [RR] = 1.14; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.01, 1.29; <i>P</i> = .04) and decreased with greater BMD z-score (unit = 0.5; RR = 0.83; 95% CI: 0.72, 0.95; <i>P</i> = .007). The model performed similarly when step rate was included instead of vertical COM displacement. <b>CONCLUSION:</b> Vertical COM displacement and BMD z-score contributed to the best model for estimating risk the risk of bone stress injury in cross-country runners. Step rate was also an important variable for assessing injury risk. <i>J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2023;53(12):1-8. Epub 20 October 2023. doi:10.2519/jospt.2023.11860</i>.</p>","PeriodicalId":50099,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"761-768"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Preseason Vertical Center of Mass Displacement During Running and Bone Mineral Density Z-Score Are Risk Factors for Bone Stress Injury Risk in Collegiate Cross-country Runners.\",\"authors\":\"Mikel R Joachim, Stephanie A Kliethermes, Bryan C Heiderscheit\",\"doi\":\"10.2519/jospt.2023.11860\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>OBJECTIVES:</b> To (1) assess relationships between running biomechanics, bone health, and bone stress injuries (BSIs), and (2) determine which variables constitute the most parsimonious BSI risk model among collegiate cross-country runners. <b>DESIGN:</b> Prospective, observational cohort study. <b>METHODS:</b> Running gait and bone mineral density (BMD) data from healthy collegiate cross-country runners were collected at preseason over 6 seasons. A generalized estimating equation model with backward selection was used to develop the most parsimonious model for estimating BSI risk, controlling for sex, running speed, and prior BSI. The variables assessed were spatiotemporal, ground reaction force, and joint kinematics, based on previous literature. Quasi-likelihood under the independence model criterion values and R<sup>2</sup> values were used to select the best-fitting model. <b>RESULTS:</b> Data from 103 runners were included in the analysis. The best-fitting model included vertical center of mass (COM) displacement and BMD z-score. Injury risk increased with greater vertical COM displacement (unit = 0.5 cm; relative risk [RR] = 1.14; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.01, 1.29; <i>P</i> = .04) and decreased with greater BMD z-score (unit = 0.5; RR = 0.83; 95% CI: 0.72, 0.95; <i>P</i> = .007). The model performed similarly when step rate was included instead of vertical COM displacement. <b>CONCLUSION:</b> Vertical COM displacement and BMD z-score contributed to the best model for estimating risk the risk of bone stress injury in cross-country runners. Step rate was also an important variable for assessing injury risk. <i>J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2023;53(12):1-8. Epub 20 October 2023. doi:10.2519/jospt.2023.11860</i>.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50099,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"761-768\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2519/jospt.2023.11860\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2519/jospt.2023.11860","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:(1)评估跑步生物力学、骨骼健康和骨应力损伤(BSI)之间的关系,以及(2)确定哪些变量构成了大学越野跑者中最简约的骨应力伤风险模型。设计:前瞻性、观察性队列研究。方法:在6个赛季的季前赛中,收集来自健康大学越野跑者的跑步步态和骨密度数据。使用具有向后选择的广义估计方程模型来开发用于估计BSI风险、控制性别、跑步速度和先前BSI的最简约模型。根据先前的文献,评估的变量包括时空、地面反作用力和关节运动学。独立性模型下的拟似然性使用标准值和R平方值来选择最佳拟合模型。结果:103名跑步者的数据被纳入分析。最佳拟合模型包括垂直重心(COM)位移和骨密度(BMD)z评分。损伤风险随着COM垂直位移的增加而增加(单位=0.5cm,RR=1.14[95%CI:1.01,1.29],p=0.04),随着BMD z评分的增加而降低(单位=0.5,RR=0.83[95%CI:0.72,0.95],p=0.007)。当包括步进率而不是垂直COM位移时,模型表现类似。结论:垂直COM位移和BMD z评分是评估越野跑者骨应力损伤风险的最佳模型。步进率也是评估受伤风险的一个重要变量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Preseason Vertical Center of Mass Displacement During Running and Bone Mineral Density Z-Score Are Risk Factors for Bone Stress Injury Risk in Collegiate Cross-country Runners.

OBJECTIVES: To (1) assess relationships between running biomechanics, bone health, and bone stress injuries (BSIs), and (2) determine which variables constitute the most parsimonious BSI risk model among collegiate cross-country runners. DESIGN: Prospective, observational cohort study. METHODS: Running gait and bone mineral density (BMD) data from healthy collegiate cross-country runners were collected at preseason over 6 seasons. A generalized estimating equation model with backward selection was used to develop the most parsimonious model for estimating BSI risk, controlling for sex, running speed, and prior BSI. The variables assessed were spatiotemporal, ground reaction force, and joint kinematics, based on previous literature. Quasi-likelihood under the independence model criterion values and R2 values were used to select the best-fitting model. RESULTS: Data from 103 runners were included in the analysis. The best-fitting model included vertical center of mass (COM) displacement and BMD z-score. Injury risk increased with greater vertical COM displacement (unit = 0.5 cm; relative risk [RR] = 1.14; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.01, 1.29; P = .04) and decreased with greater BMD z-score (unit = 0.5; RR = 0.83; 95% CI: 0.72, 0.95; P = .007). The model performed similarly when step rate was included instead of vertical COM displacement. CONCLUSION: Vertical COM displacement and BMD z-score contributed to the best model for estimating risk the risk of bone stress injury in cross-country runners. Step rate was also an important variable for assessing injury risk. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2023;53(12):1-8. Epub 20 October 2023. doi:10.2519/jospt.2023.11860.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
4.90%
发文量
101
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy® (JOSPT®) publishes scientifically rigorous, clinically relevant content for physical therapists and others in the health care community to advance musculoskeletal and sports-related practice globally. To this end, JOSPT features the latest evidence-based research and clinical cases in musculoskeletal health, injury, and rehabilitation, including physical therapy, orthopaedics, sports medicine, and biomechanics. With an impact factor of 3.090, JOSPT is among the highest ranked physical therapy journals in Clarivate Analytics''s Journal Citation Reports, Science Edition (2017). JOSPT stands eighth of 65 journals in the category of rehabilitation, twelfth of 77 journals in orthopedics, and fourteenth of 81 journals in sport sciences. JOSPT''s 5-year impact factor is 4.061.
期刊最新文献
Concussion Incidence by Type of Sport: Differences by Sex, Age Groups, Type of Session, and Level of Play An Overview of Systematic Reviews With Meta-analysis. Differential Effects of Quadriceps and Hip Muscle Exercises for Patellofemoral Pain: A Secondary Effect Modifier Analysis of a Randomized Trial. Improvements in Forward Bending Are Related to Improvements in Pain and Disability During Cognitive Functional Therapy for People With Chronic Low Back Pain. The Influence of "Labels" for Neck Pain on Recovery Expectations Following a Motor Vehicle Crash: An Online-Randomized Vignette-Based Experiment. Encouraging New Moms to Move More-Are We Missing the Mark? A Systematic Review With Meta-Analysis of the Effect of Exercise Interventions on Postpartum Physical Activity Levels and Cardiorespiratory Fitness.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1