复合事件期间野火烟雾暴露对健康的急性影响:2016年大烟山野火的案例交叉研究。

IF 4.3 2区 医学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Geohealth Pub Date : 2023-10-20 DOI:10.1029/2023GH000860
Sara Duncan, Charlie Reed, Taylin Spurlock, Margaret M. Sugg, Jennifer D. Runkle
{"title":"复合事件期间野火烟雾暴露对健康的急性影响:2016年大烟山野火的案例交叉研究。","authors":"Sara Duncan,&nbsp;Charlie Reed,&nbsp;Taylin Spurlock,&nbsp;Margaret M. Sugg,&nbsp;Jennifer D. Runkle","doi":"10.1029/2023GH000860","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In 2016, unprecedented intense wildfires burned over 150,000 acres in the southern Appalachian Mountains in the United States. Smoke from these fires greatly impacted the region and exposure to this smoke was significant. A bidirectional case-crossover design was applied to assess the relationship between PM<sub>2.5</sub> (a surrogate for wildfire smoke) exposure and respiratory- and cardiovascular-related emergency department (ED) visits in Western North Carolina during these events. For 0-, 3-, and 7-day lags, findings indicated a significant increase in the odds of being admitted to the ED for a respiratory (ORs: 1.055, 95% CI: 1.048–1.063; 1.083, 1.074–1.092; 1.066, 1.058–1.074; respectively) or cardiovascular event (ORs: 1.052, 95% CI: 1.045–1.060; 1.074, 1.066–1.081; 1.067, 1.060–1.075; respectively) for every 5 μg/m<sup>3</sup> increase in PM<sub>2.5</sub> over a chosen cutpoint of 20.4 μg/m<sup>3</sup>. For all endpoints assessed except for emphysema, there were statistically significant increases in odds from 5.1% to 8.3%. In general, this increase was most pronounced 3 days after exposure. Additionally, individuals aged 55+ generally experience higher odds of heart disease at the 3- and 7-day lag points, and Black/African Americans generally experience higher odds of asthma at the 3-day lag point. In general, larger fires and increased numbers of fires within counties resulted in higher health burden at same day exposure. In a secondary analysis, the odds of an ED visit increased by over 40% in several cases among people exposed to days above the Environmental Protection Agency 24-hr PM<sub>2.5</sub> standard of 35 μg/m<sup>3</sup>. Our findings provide new understanding on the health impacts of wildfires on rural populations in the southeastern US.</p>","PeriodicalId":48618,"journal":{"name":"Geohealth","volume":"7 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1029/2023GH000860","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Acute Health Effects of Wildfire Smoke Exposure During a Compound Event: A Case-Crossover Study of the 2016 Great Smoky Mountain Wildfires\",\"authors\":\"Sara Duncan,&nbsp;Charlie Reed,&nbsp;Taylin Spurlock,&nbsp;Margaret M. Sugg,&nbsp;Jennifer D. Runkle\",\"doi\":\"10.1029/2023GH000860\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>In 2016, unprecedented intense wildfires burned over 150,000 acres in the southern Appalachian Mountains in the United States. Smoke from these fires greatly impacted the region and exposure to this smoke was significant. A bidirectional case-crossover design was applied to assess the relationship between PM<sub>2.5</sub> (a surrogate for wildfire smoke) exposure and respiratory- and cardiovascular-related emergency department (ED) visits in Western North Carolina during these events. For 0-, 3-, and 7-day lags, findings indicated a significant increase in the odds of being admitted to the ED for a respiratory (ORs: 1.055, 95% CI: 1.048–1.063; 1.083, 1.074–1.092; 1.066, 1.058–1.074; respectively) or cardiovascular event (ORs: 1.052, 95% CI: 1.045–1.060; 1.074, 1.066–1.081; 1.067, 1.060–1.075; respectively) for every 5 μg/m<sup>3</sup> increase in PM<sub>2.5</sub> over a chosen cutpoint of 20.4 μg/m<sup>3</sup>. For all endpoints assessed except for emphysema, there were statistically significant increases in odds from 5.1% to 8.3%. In general, this increase was most pronounced 3 days after exposure. Additionally, individuals aged 55+ generally experience higher odds of heart disease at the 3- and 7-day lag points, and Black/African Americans generally experience higher odds of asthma at the 3-day lag point. In general, larger fires and increased numbers of fires within counties resulted in higher health burden at same day exposure. In a secondary analysis, the odds of an ED visit increased by over 40% in several cases among people exposed to days above the Environmental Protection Agency 24-hr PM<sub>2.5</sub> standard of 35 μg/m<sup>3</sup>. Our findings provide new understanding on the health impacts of wildfires on rural populations in the southeastern US.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48618,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Geohealth\",\"volume\":\"7 10\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1029/2023GH000860\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Geohealth\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2023GH000860\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geohealth","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2023GH000860","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

2016年,美国阿巴拉契亚山脉南部发生了前所未有的强烈野火,烧毁了超过15万英亩的土地。这些火灾产生的烟雾极大地影响了该地区,暴露在这种烟雾中的情况非常严重。采用双向病例交叉设计来评估PM2.5(野火烟雾的替代物)暴露与这些事件期间北卡罗来纳州西部呼吸和心血管相关急诊科(ED)就诊之间的关系。对于0、3和7天的滞后,研究结果表明,在选定的20.4微克/立方米的分界点上,PM2.5每增加5微克/立方米,因呼吸系统疾病(ORs:1.055,95%CI:1.048-1.063;分别为1.0831.074-1.092;1.0661.058-1.074)或心血管事件(ORs:1.052,95%CI:1.045-1.060;1.0741.066-1.081;1.0671.060-1.075)入院的几率就会显著增加。对于除肺气肿外的所有评估终点,从5.1%到8.3%的比值都有统计学上的显著增加。一般来说,这种增加在暴露后3天最为明显。此外,55岁以上的人在3天和7天的滞后点患心脏病的几率通常更高,黑人/非裔美国人在3天滞后点患哮喘的几率通常也更高。一般来说,较大的火灾和县内火灾数量的增加导致了当天暴露的更高的健康负担。在一项二次分析中,在一些情况下,暴露在环境保护局24小时PM2.5标准35微克/立方米以上的人群中,ED就诊的几率增加了40%以上。我们的发现为美国东南部野火对农村人口健康的影响提供了新的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Acute Health Effects of Wildfire Smoke Exposure During a Compound Event: A Case-Crossover Study of the 2016 Great Smoky Mountain Wildfires

In 2016, unprecedented intense wildfires burned over 150,000 acres in the southern Appalachian Mountains in the United States. Smoke from these fires greatly impacted the region and exposure to this smoke was significant. A bidirectional case-crossover design was applied to assess the relationship between PM2.5 (a surrogate for wildfire smoke) exposure and respiratory- and cardiovascular-related emergency department (ED) visits in Western North Carolina during these events. For 0-, 3-, and 7-day lags, findings indicated a significant increase in the odds of being admitted to the ED for a respiratory (ORs: 1.055, 95% CI: 1.048–1.063; 1.083, 1.074–1.092; 1.066, 1.058–1.074; respectively) or cardiovascular event (ORs: 1.052, 95% CI: 1.045–1.060; 1.074, 1.066–1.081; 1.067, 1.060–1.075; respectively) for every 5 μg/m3 increase in PM2.5 over a chosen cutpoint of 20.4 μg/m3. For all endpoints assessed except for emphysema, there were statistically significant increases in odds from 5.1% to 8.3%. In general, this increase was most pronounced 3 days after exposure. Additionally, individuals aged 55+ generally experience higher odds of heart disease at the 3- and 7-day lag points, and Black/African Americans generally experience higher odds of asthma at the 3-day lag point. In general, larger fires and increased numbers of fires within counties resulted in higher health burden at same day exposure. In a secondary analysis, the odds of an ED visit increased by over 40% in several cases among people exposed to days above the Environmental Protection Agency 24-hr PM2.5 standard of 35 μg/m3. Our findings provide new understanding on the health impacts of wildfires on rural populations in the southeastern US.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Geohealth
Geohealth Environmental Science-Pollution
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
6.20%
发文量
124
审稿时长
19 weeks
期刊介绍: GeoHealth will publish original research, reviews, policy discussions, and commentaries that cover the growing science on the interface among the Earth, atmospheric, oceans and environmental sciences, ecology, and the agricultural and health sciences. The journal will cover a wide variety of global and local issues including the impacts of climate change on human, agricultural, and ecosystem health, air and water pollution, environmental persistence of herbicides and pesticides, radiation and health, geomedicine, and the health effects of disasters. Many of these topics and others are of critical importance in the developing world and all require bringing together leading research across multiple disciplines.
期刊最新文献
Planetary Health Booms: Unpacking the Surge in Research Across the Globe Through Joint-Point Analysis Satellite-Derived, Smartphone-Delivered Geospatial Cholera Risk Information for Vulnerable Populations Upstream Oil and Gas Production and Community COVID-19 Case and Mortality Rates in California, USA Association of Long-Term Exposure to PM2.5 Constituents and Green Space With Arthritis and Rheumatoid Arthritis Methods for Quantifying Source-Specific Air Pollution Exposure to Serve Epidemiology, Risk Assessment, and Environmental Justice
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1