听力学家对向国家早期听力检测和干预计划报告听力评估结果的看法。

Winnie Chung, Maria C Sanchez-Gomez
{"title":"听力学家对向国家早期听力检测和干预计划报告听力评估结果的看法。","authors":"Winnie Chung,&nbsp;Maria C Sanchez-Gomez","doi":"10.26077/df10-2c4d","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To describe an evaluation conducted by 39 state Early Hearing Detection and Intervention (EHDI) programs on the reporting process and system usability for audiologists when reporting the hearing test results to the EHDI program and the barriers encountered during reporting.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Each author independently extracted numbers, percentages, and texts from the evaluation reports into an Excel spreadsheet, which then became the dataset. Authors then compared and cross-checked the datasets before coding. Texts conveying similar concepts were coded with the same name and organized into categories. Finally, thematic identification and analysis were performed when a theme(s) or concept(s) that pertained to similar challenges encountered by audiologists was identified and organized under a higher-order domain.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Some audiologists reported no barriers when reporting hearing test results to the state EHDI programs. Among those audiologists who reported barriers, the most recurrent barrier was a non-user-friendly data system design. The second most recurrent barrier was not having adequate administrative time to report data as a busy clinician. The third most recurrent barrier was an incomplete understanding of the state EHDI reporting requirements. Finally, the method audiologists were required to use when reporting results also posed some challenges, such as no internet connection in rural areas when required to report via an internet portal.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Because of the wide variety of barriers faced by audiologists, multiple strategies to improve the reporting process would likely be beneficial.</p>","PeriodicalId":91737,"journal":{"name":"Journal of early hearing detection and intervention","volume":"6 2","pages":"79-86"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10588097/pdf/nihms-1934820.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Audiologist Perception on Reporting Hearing Assessment Results to State Early Hearing Detection and Intervention Programs.\",\"authors\":\"Winnie Chung,&nbsp;Maria C Sanchez-Gomez\",\"doi\":\"10.26077/df10-2c4d\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To describe an evaluation conducted by 39 state Early Hearing Detection and Intervention (EHDI) programs on the reporting process and system usability for audiologists when reporting the hearing test results to the EHDI program and the barriers encountered during reporting.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Each author independently extracted numbers, percentages, and texts from the evaluation reports into an Excel spreadsheet, which then became the dataset. Authors then compared and cross-checked the datasets before coding. Texts conveying similar concepts were coded with the same name and organized into categories. Finally, thematic identification and analysis were performed when a theme(s) or concept(s) that pertained to similar challenges encountered by audiologists was identified and organized under a higher-order domain.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Some audiologists reported no barriers when reporting hearing test results to the state EHDI programs. Among those audiologists who reported barriers, the most recurrent barrier was a non-user-friendly data system design. The second most recurrent barrier was not having adequate administrative time to report data as a busy clinician. The third most recurrent barrier was an incomplete understanding of the state EHDI reporting requirements. Finally, the method audiologists were required to use when reporting results also posed some challenges, such as no internet connection in rural areas when required to report via an internet portal.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Because of the wide variety of barriers faced by audiologists, multiple strategies to improve the reporting process would likely be beneficial.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":91737,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of early hearing detection and intervention\",\"volume\":\"6 2\",\"pages\":\"79-86\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10588097/pdf/nihms-1934820.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of early hearing detection and intervention\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.26077/df10-2c4d\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of early hearing detection and intervention","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26077/df10-2c4d","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:描述39个州的早期听力检测和干预(EHDI)项目对听力学家在向EHDI项目报告听力测试结果时的报告过程和系统可用性以及报告过程中遇到的障碍进行的评估。方法:每位作者将评估报告中的数字、百分比和文本独立提取到Excel电子表格中,然后将其作为数据集。然后,作者在编码之前对数据集进行了比较和交叉检查。传达相似概念的文本用相同的名称编码,并按类别组织。最后,当与听力学家遇到的类似挑战有关的主题或概念被识别并组织在一个更高阶域下时,就进行了主题识别和分析。结果:一些听力学家在向州EHDI项目报告听力测试结果时报告没有障碍。在那些报告障碍的听力学家中,最常见的障碍是非用户友好的数据系统设计。第二个最经常出现的障碍是,作为一名繁忙的临床医生,没有足够的管理时间来报告数据。第三个最经常出现的障碍是对州EHDI报告要求的不完全理解。最后,听力学家在报告结果时被要求使用的方法也带来了一些挑战,例如在农村地区,当需要通过互联网门户进行报告时,没有互联网连接。结论:由于听力学家面临着各种各样的障碍,改进报告过程的多种策略可能是有益的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Audiologist Perception on Reporting Hearing Assessment Results to State Early Hearing Detection and Intervention Programs.

Purpose: To describe an evaluation conducted by 39 state Early Hearing Detection and Intervention (EHDI) programs on the reporting process and system usability for audiologists when reporting the hearing test results to the EHDI program and the barriers encountered during reporting.

Method: Each author independently extracted numbers, percentages, and texts from the evaluation reports into an Excel spreadsheet, which then became the dataset. Authors then compared and cross-checked the datasets before coding. Texts conveying similar concepts were coded with the same name and organized into categories. Finally, thematic identification and analysis were performed when a theme(s) or concept(s) that pertained to similar challenges encountered by audiologists was identified and organized under a higher-order domain.

Results: Some audiologists reported no barriers when reporting hearing test results to the state EHDI programs. Among those audiologists who reported barriers, the most recurrent barrier was a non-user-friendly data system design. The second most recurrent barrier was not having adequate administrative time to report data as a busy clinician. The third most recurrent barrier was an incomplete understanding of the state EHDI reporting requirements. Finally, the method audiologists were required to use when reporting results also posed some challenges, such as no internet connection in rural areas when required to report via an internet portal.

Conclusion: Because of the wide variety of barriers faced by audiologists, multiple strategies to improve the reporting process would likely be beneficial.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Early Experiences of Parents of Children who are Deaf or Hard of Hearing: Navigating through Identification, Intervention, and Beyond. Assessing Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic on Receipt and Timeliness of Newborn Hearing Screening and Diagnostic Services Among Infants Born in Four States. Likely Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Newborn Hearing Screening and Follow-up Services in the United States in 2020. Language Growth in Children with Mild to Severe Hearing Loss who Received Early Intervention by 3 Months or 6 Months of Age. Visual Reinforcers Designed for Children with Developmental Disabilities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1