应用功能共振分析方法(FRAM)进行社区层面的洪水风险管理:郡山市台风海贝思期间的应急响应过程

IF 3.8 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Progress in Disaster Science Pub Date : 2023-10-01 Epub Date: 2023-06-28 DOI:10.1016/j.pdisas.2023.100291
Takuya Togawa , Hiroyoshi Morita , Takashi Tsuji
{"title":"应用功能共振分析方法(FRAM)进行社区层面的洪水风险管理:郡山市台风海贝思期间的应急响应过程","authors":"Takuya Togawa ,&nbsp;Hiroyoshi Morita ,&nbsp;Takashi Tsuji","doi":"10.1016/j.pdisas.2023.100291","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study used the functional resonance analysis method (FRAM) to analyze a real-world example of an emergency-response process, one that occurred in Koriyama city, Japan, during Typhoon Hagibis (known in Japan as Typhoon No. 19, or Reiwa 1 East Japan Typhoon). The analysis revealed nine functions that constitute the municipality's emergency-response process (including Public Communication, Provision/Management of Evacuation Shelters, Evacuation, and Rescue Operations) as well as the interactive relationships between these functions. It also revealed how variabilities in the timeliness and accuracy of the functions resonated with (reinforced) each other, culminating in an incident involving a backlog of emergency calls. From these results, two recommendations were derived: reviewing the public communication system and building a framework for minimizing variability in evacuation behavior. And also, based on the FRAM analysis we could contextualize the interview data and the individual phenomena described fragmentally in the retrospective report (used for evaluating the disaster response), thereby gaining an understanding of the incident generation mechanism. In conclusion, the study demonstrated FRAM can be an effective tool for retrospective evaluation of disaster response or revising a disaster plan.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":52341,"journal":{"name":"Progress in Disaster Science","volume":"19 ","pages":"Article 100291"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Applying the functional resonance analysis method (FRAM) to flood risk management at a community level: Koriyama city's emergency-response process during Typhoon Hagibis\",\"authors\":\"Takuya Togawa ,&nbsp;Hiroyoshi Morita ,&nbsp;Takashi Tsuji\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.pdisas.2023.100291\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This study used the functional resonance analysis method (FRAM) to analyze a real-world example of an emergency-response process, one that occurred in Koriyama city, Japan, during Typhoon Hagibis (known in Japan as Typhoon No. 19, or Reiwa 1 East Japan Typhoon). The analysis revealed nine functions that constitute the municipality's emergency-response process (including Public Communication, Provision/Management of Evacuation Shelters, Evacuation, and Rescue Operations) as well as the interactive relationships between these functions. It also revealed how variabilities in the timeliness and accuracy of the functions resonated with (reinforced) each other, culminating in an incident involving a backlog of emergency calls. From these results, two recommendations were derived: reviewing the public communication system and building a framework for minimizing variability in evacuation behavior. And also, based on the FRAM analysis we could contextualize the interview data and the individual phenomena described fragmentally in the retrospective report (used for evaluating the disaster response), thereby gaining an understanding of the incident generation mechanism. In conclusion, the study demonstrated FRAM can be an effective tool for retrospective evaluation of disaster response or revising a disaster plan.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":52341,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Progress in Disaster Science\",\"volume\":\"19 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100291\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Progress in Disaster Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590061723000182\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/6/28 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Progress in Disaster Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590061723000182","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/6/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究使用功能共振分析方法(FRAM)分析了一个真实世界中的应急响应过程示例,该示例发生在台风“哈比比斯”(日本称为第19号台风,或瑞娃1号东日本台风)期间的日本山市。分析揭示了构成市政府应急响应流程的九项职能(包括公共沟通、提供/管理疏散避难所、疏散和救援行动),以及这些职能之间的互动关系。它还揭示了功能的及时性和准确性的可变性是如何相互共振(加强)的,最终导致了一个涉及紧急呼叫积压的事件。从这些结果中,得出了两项建议:审查公共通信系统和建立一个框架,以最大限度地减少疏散行为的可变性。此外,基于FRAM分析,我们可以将访谈数据和回顾性报告(用于评估灾害应对)中零碎描述的个别现象置于情境中,从而了解事件的产生机制。总之,该研究表明,FRAM可以成为回顾性评估灾害应对或修订灾害计划的有效工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Applying the functional resonance analysis method (FRAM) to flood risk management at a community level: Koriyama city's emergency-response process during Typhoon Hagibis

This study used the functional resonance analysis method (FRAM) to analyze a real-world example of an emergency-response process, one that occurred in Koriyama city, Japan, during Typhoon Hagibis (known in Japan as Typhoon No. 19, or Reiwa 1 East Japan Typhoon). The analysis revealed nine functions that constitute the municipality's emergency-response process (including Public Communication, Provision/Management of Evacuation Shelters, Evacuation, and Rescue Operations) as well as the interactive relationships between these functions. It also revealed how variabilities in the timeliness and accuracy of the functions resonated with (reinforced) each other, culminating in an incident involving a backlog of emergency calls. From these results, two recommendations were derived: reviewing the public communication system and building a framework for minimizing variability in evacuation behavior. And also, based on the FRAM analysis we could contextualize the interview data and the individual phenomena described fragmentally in the retrospective report (used for evaluating the disaster response), thereby gaining an understanding of the incident generation mechanism. In conclusion, the study demonstrated FRAM can be an effective tool for retrospective evaluation of disaster response or revising a disaster plan.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Progress in Disaster Science
Progress in Disaster Science Social Sciences-Safety Research
CiteScore
14.60
自引率
3.20%
发文量
51
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Progress in Disaster Science is a Gold Open Access journal focusing on integrating research and policy in disaster research, and publishes original research papers and invited viewpoint articles on disaster risk reduction; response; emergency management and recovery. A key part of the Journal's Publication output will see key experts invited to assess and comment on the current trends in disaster research, as well as highlight key papers.
期刊最新文献
Pastoral and agropastoral community perception of climate change, adaptation strategies and determinant of the choice of adaptation strategies in Guji zone, southern Ethiopia Equity or exclusion? An alternative framework to disaster risks assessment metrics Would've, could've, should've – The role of cognitive and affective appraisal in the judgment of human vs. nature caused disasters Spatio-temporal analysis and Farmer's perception and adaptation practices to cope with agricultural drought in Eastern Province, Rwanda Factors associated with resilience in the context of multiple consecutive disasters: A qualitative study of survivors of World Trade Center, Hurricane Sandy, and COVID-19 disasters
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1