{"title":"粒子滤波的上坡重采样及其在图形处理器上的实现","authors":"Özcan Dülger , Halit Oğuztüzün , Mübeccel Demirekler","doi":"10.1016/j.parco.2022.102994","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>We introduce a new resampling method, named Uphill, that is free from numerical instability and suitable for parallel implementation on graphics processing unit (GPU). Common resampling algorithms such as Systematic suffer from numerical instability when single precision floating point numbers are used. This is due to cumulative summation over the weights of particles when the weights differ widely or the number of particles is large. The Metropolis and Rejection resampling algorithms do not suffer from numerical instability as they only calculate the ratios of weights pairwise rather than perform collective operations over the weights. They are more suitable for the GPU implementation of the particle filter. However, they undergo non-coalesced global memory access patterns which cause their speed deteriorate rapidly as the number of particles gets large. Uphill also does not suffer from numerical instability but, experiences the same non-coalesced global memory access problem with Metropolis and Rejection. We introduce its faster version named Uphill-Fast which eliminates this problem. We make comparisons of Uphill and Uphill-Fast with the Systematic, Metropolis, Metropolis-C2 and Rejection resampling methods with respect to quality and speed. We also compare them on a highly non-linear system. Uphill-Fast runs faster and attains similar quality, in terms of RMSE, in comparison with Metropolis and Rejection when the number of particles is very large. Uphill-Fast runs with roughly same speed as Metropolis-C2 with better variance and MSE when the number of particles is very large.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54642,"journal":{"name":"Parallel Computing","volume":"115 ","pages":"Article 102994"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Uphill resampling for particle filter and its implementation on graphics processing unit\",\"authors\":\"Özcan Dülger , Halit Oğuztüzün , Mübeccel Demirekler\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.parco.2022.102994\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>We introduce a new resampling method, named Uphill, that is free from numerical instability and suitable for parallel implementation on graphics processing unit (GPU). Common resampling algorithms such as Systematic suffer from numerical instability when single precision floating point numbers are used. This is due to cumulative summation over the weights of particles when the weights differ widely or the number of particles is large. The Metropolis and Rejection resampling algorithms do not suffer from numerical instability as they only calculate the ratios of weights pairwise rather than perform collective operations over the weights. They are more suitable for the GPU implementation of the particle filter. However, they undergo non-coalesced global memory access patterns which cause their speed deteriorate rapidly as the number of particles gets large. Uphill also does not suffer from numerical instability but, experiences the same non-coalesced global memory access problem with Metropolis and Rejection. We introduce its faster version named Uphill-Fast which eliminates this problem. We make comparisons of Uphill and Uphill-Fast with the Systematic, Metropolis, Metropolis-C2 and Rejection resampling methods with respect to quality and speed. We also compare them on a highly non-linear system. Uphill-Fast runs faster and attains similar quality, in terms of RMSE, in comparison with Metropolis and Rejection when the number of particles is very large. Uphill-Fast runs with roughly same speed as Metropolis-C2 with better variance and MSE when the number of particles is very large.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54642,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Parallel Computing\",\"volume\":\"115 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102994\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Parallel Computing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167819122000837\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, THEORY & METHODS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Parallel Computing","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167819122000837","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, THEORY & METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Uphill resampling for particle filter and its implementation on graphics processing unit
We introduce a new resampling method, named Uphill, that is free from numerical instability and suitable for parallel implementation on graphics processing unit (GPU). Common resampling algorithms such as Systematic suffer from numerical instability when single precision floating point numbers are used. This is due to cumulative summation over the weights of particles when the weights differ widely or the number of particles is large. The Metropolis and Rejection resampling algorithms do not suffer from numerical instability as they only calculate the ratios of weights pairwise rather than perform collective operations over the weights. They are more suitable for the GPU implementation of the particle filter. However, they undergo non-coalesced global memory access patterns which cause their speed deteriorate rapidly as the number of particles gets large. Uphill also does not suffer from numerical instability but, experiences the same non-coalesced global memory access problem with Metropolis and Rejection. We introduce its faster version named Uphill-Fast which eliminates this problem. We make comparisons of Uphill and Uphill-Fast with the Systematic, Metropolis, Metropolis-C2 and Rejection resampling methods with respect to quality and speed. We also compare them on a highly non-linear system. Uphill-Fast runs faster and attains similar quality, in terms of RMSE, in comparison with Metropolis and Rejection when the number of particles is very large. Uphill-Fast runs with roughly same speed as Metropolis-C2 with better variance and MSE when the number of particles is very large.
期刊介绍:
Parallel Computing is an international journal presenting the practical use of parallel computer systems, including high performance architecture, system software, programming systems and tools, and applications. Within this context the journal covers all aspects of high-end parallel computing from single homogeneous or heterogenous computing nodes to large-scale multi-node systems.
Parallel Computing features original research work and review articles as well as novel or illustrative accounts of application experience with (and techniques for) the use of parallel computers. We also welcome studies reproducing prior publications that either confirm or disprove prior published results.
Particular technical areas of interest include, but are not limited to:
-System software for parallel computer systems including programming languages (new languages as well as compilation techniques), operating systems (including middleware), and resource management (scheduling and load-balancing).
-Enabling software including debuggers, performance tools, and system and numeric libraries.
-General hardware (architecture) concepts, new technologies enabling the realization of such new concepts, and details of commercially available systems
-Software engineering and productivity as it relates to parallel computing
-Applications (including scientific computing, deep learning, machine learning) or tool case studies demonstrating novel ways to achieve parallelism
-Performance measurement results on state-of-the-art systems
-Approaches to effectively utilize large-scale parallel computing including new algorithms or algorithm analysis with demonstrated relevance to real applications using existing or next generation parallel computer architectures.
-Parallel I/O systems both hardware and software
-Networking technology for support of high-speed computing demonstrating the impact of high-speed computation on parallel applications