粒子滤波的上坡重采样及其在图形处理器上的实现

IF 2 4区 计算机科学 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, THEORY & METHODS Parallel Computing Pub Date : 2023-02-01 DOI:10.1016/j.parco.2022.102994
Özcan Dülger , Halit Oğuztüzün , Mübeccel Demirekler
{"title":"粒子滤波的上坡重采样及其在图形处理器上的实现","authors":"Özcan Dülger ,&nbsp;Halit Oğuztüzün ,&nbsp;Mübeccel Demirekler","doi":"10.1016/j.parco.2022.102994","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>We introduce a new resampling method, named Uphill, that is free from numerical instability and suitable for parallel implementation on graphics processing unit (GPU). Common resampling algorithms such as Systematic suffer from numerical instability when single precision floating point numbers are used. This is due to cumulative summation over the weights of particles when the weights differ widely or the number of particles is large. The Metropolis and Rejection resampling algorithms do not suffer from numerical instability as they only calculate the ratios of weights pairwise rather than perform collective operations over the weights. They are more suitable for the GPU implementation of the particle filter. However, they undergo non-coalesced global memory access patterns which cause their speed deteriorate rapidly as the number of particles gets large. Uphill also does not suffer from numerical instability but, experiences the same non-coalesced global memory access problem with Metropolis and Rejection. We introduce its faster version named Uphill-Fast which eliminates this problem. We make comparisons of Uphill and Uphill-Fast with the Systematic, Metropolis, Metropolis-C2 and Rejection resampling methods with respect to quality and speed. We also compare them on a highly non-linear system. Uphill-Fast runs faster and attains similar quality, in terms of RMSE, in comparison with Metropolis and Rejection when the number of particles is very large. Uphill-Fast runs with roughly same speed as Metropolis-C2 with better variance and MSE when the number of particles is very large.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54642,"journal":{"name":"Parallel Computing","volume":"115 ","pages":"Article 102994"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Uphill resampling for particle filter and its implementation on graphics processing unit\",\"authors\":\"Özcan Dülger ,&nbsp;Halit Oğuztüzün ,&nbsp;Mübeccel Demirekler\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.parco.2022.102994\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>We introduce a new resampling method, named Uphill, that is free from numerical instability and suitable for parallel implementation on graphics processing unit (GPU). Common resampling algorithms such as Systematic suffer from numerical instability when single precision floating point numbers are used. This is due to cumulative summation over the weights of particles when the weights differ widely or the number of particles is large. The Metropolis and Rejection resampling algorithms do not suffer from numerical instability as they only calculate the ratios of weights pairwise rather than perform collective operations over the weights. They are more suitable for the GPU implementation of the particle filter. However, they undergo non-coalesced global memory access patterns which cause their speed deteriorate rapidly as the number of particles gets large. Uphill also does not suffer from numerical instability but, experiences the same non-coalesced global memory access problem with Metropolis and Rejection. We introduce its faster version named Uphill-Fast which eliminates this problem. We make comparisons of Uphill and Uphill-Fast with the Systematic, Metropolis, Metropolis-C2 and Rejection resampling methods with respect to quality and speed. We also compare them on a highly non-linear system. Uphill-Fast runs faster and attains similar quality, in terms of RMSE, in comparison with Metropolis and Rejection when the number of particles is very large. Uphill-Fast runs with roughly same speed as Metropolis-C2 with better variance and MSE when the number of particles is very large.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54642,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Parallel Computing\",\"volume\":\"115 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102994\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Parallel Computing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167819122000837\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, THEORY & METHODS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Parallel Computing","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167819122000837","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, THEORY & METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们介绍了一种新的重采样方法Uphill,它不存在数值不稳定性,适合在图形处理单元(GPU)上并行实现。当使用单精度浮点数时,诸如Systematic之类的常见重采样算法会受到数值不稳定性的影响。这是由于当权重差异很大或粒子数量很大时,粒子权重的累积总和。Metropolis和Rejection重采样算法不会受到数值不稳定性的影响,因为它们只成对计算权重的比率,而不是对权重执行集体运算。它们更适合于粒子过滤器的GPU实现。然而,它们经历了非合并的全局内存访问模式,这导致它们的速度随着粒子数量的增加而迅速恶化。Uphill也没有受到数值不稳定性的影响,但遇到了与Metropolis和Rejection相同的非联合全局内存访问问题。我们推出了名为Uphill Fast的更快版本,它消除了这个问题。我们将Uphill和Uphill Fast与Systematic、Metropolis-C2和Rejection重采样方法在质量和速度方面进行了比较。我们还在一个高度非线性的系统上对它们进行了比较。Uphill Fast在粒子数量非常大的情况下,与Metropolis和Rejection相比,在RMSE方面跑得更快,并达到类似的质量。Uphill Fast以与Metropolis-C2大致相同的速度运行,在粒子数量很大时具有更好的方差和MSE。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Uphill resampling for particle filter and its implementation on graphics processing unit

We introduce a new resampling method, named Uphill, that is free from numerical instability and suitable for parallel implementation on graphics processing unit (GPU). Common resampling algorithms such as Systematic suffer from numerical instability when single precision floating point numbers are used. This is due to cumulative summation over the weights of particles when the weights differ widely or the number of particles is large. The Metropolis and Rejection resampling algorithms do not suffer from numerical instability as they only calculate the ratios of weights pairwise rather than perform collective operations over the weights. They are more suitable for the GPU implementation of the particle filter. However, they undergo non-coalesced global memory access patterns which cause their speed deteriorate rapidly as the number of particles gets large. Uphill also does not suffer from numerical instability but, experiences the same non-coalesced global memory access problem with Metropolis and Rejection. We introduce its faster version named Uphill-Fast which eliminates this problem. We make comparisons of Uphill and Uphill-Fast with the Systematic, Metropolis, Metropolis-C2 and Rejection resampling methods with respect to quality and speed. We also compare them on a highly non-linear system. Uphill-Fast runs faster and attains similar quality, in terms of RMSE, in comparison with Metropolis and Rejection when the number of particles is very large. Uphill-Fast runs with roughly same speed as Metropolis-C2 with better variance and MSE when the number of particles is very large.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Parallel Computing
Parallel Computing 工程技术-计算机:理论方法
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
7.10%
发文量
49
审稿时长
4.5 months
期刊介绍: Parallel Computing is an international journal presenting the practical use of parallel computer systems, including high performance architecture, system software, programming systems and tools, and applications. Within this context the journal covers all aspects of high-end parallel computing from single homogeneous or heterogenous computing nodes to large-scale multi-node systems. Parallel Computing features original research work and review articles as well as novel or illustrative accounts of application experience with (and techniques for) the use of parallel computers. We also welcome studies reproducing prior publications that either confirm or disprove prior published results. Particular technical areas of interest include, but are not limited to: -System software for parallel computer systems including programming languages (new languages as well as compilation techniques), operating systems (including middleware), and resource management (scheduling and load-balancing). -Enabling software including debuggers, performance tools, and system and numeric libraries. -General hardware (architecture) concepts, new technologies enabling the realization of such new concepts, and details of commercially available systems -Software engineering and productivity as it relates to parallel computing -Applications (including scientific computing, deep learning, machine learning) or tool case studies demonstrating novel ways to achieve parallelism -Performance measurement results on state-of-the-art systems -Approaches to effectively utilize large-scale parallel computing including new algorithms or algorithm analysis with demonstrated relevance to real applications using existing or next generation parallel computer architectures. -Parallel I/O systems both hardware and software -Networking technology for support of high-speed computing demonstrating the impact of high-speed computation on parallel applications
期刊最新文献
Towards resilient and energy efficient scalable Krylov solvers Seesaw: A 4096-bit vector processor for accelerating Kyber based on RISC-V ISA extensions Editorial Board FastPTM: Fast weights loading of pre-trained models for parallel inference service provisioning Distributed consensus-based estimation of the leading eigenvalue of a non-negative irreducible matrix
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1