水资源管理和间稻种植对阿肯色州甲烷排放和产量的影响

IF 6 1区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment Pub Date : 2023-10-15 DOI:10.1016/j.agee.2023.108652
Marguerita Leavitt , Beatriz Moreno-García , Colby W. Reavis , Michele L. Reba , Benjamin R.K. Runkle
{"title":"水资源管理和间稻种植对阿肯色州甲烷排放和产量的影响","authors":"Marguerita Leavitt ,&nbsp;Beatriz Moreno-García ,&nbsp;Colby W. Reavis ,&nbsp;Michele L. Reba ,&nbsp;Benjamin R.K. Runkle","doi":"10.1016/j.agee.2023.108652","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span>Sustainable intensification of rice farming is crucial to meeting human food needs while reducing environmental impacts. Rice production represents 8% of all anthropogenic emissions of CH</span><sub>4</sub><span>, a potent greenhouse gas. Cultivation practices that minimize the number of days the rice fields<span> are flooded, such as irrigation using the alternate wetting and drying (AWD) technique instead of continuous flooding (DF) can potentially reduce CH</span></span><sub>4</sub> emissions. Ratoon cropping, wherein a second crop of rice is grown from the harvested stubble of the first crop, can produce additional yield with minimal labor but may generate more CH<sub>4</sub> than single cropping. The objectives of this study were first to test different water management regimes for their impact on yield and CH<sub>4</sub> emissions, and second to investigate CH<sub>4</sub> emissions from a ratoon crop and perform an exploratory economic analysis of ratoon cropping. Two adjacent fields in Lonoke County, Arkansas were compared under different irrigation treatments from 2015 through 2020; the 2020 season also included a ratoon crop. Field-scale CH<sub>4</sub><span> emissions were measured using the eddy covariance method at each field. AWD reduced CH</span><sub>4</sub> emissions by 79.5% on average in comparison to DF for the main seasons. Across the field-seasons, the emissions from the main crop ranged from 77.2 to 132.5 kg CH<sub>4</sub>-C ha<sup>−1</sup> under DF and from 7.1 to 40.7 kg CH<sub>4</sub>-C ha<sup>−1</sup> under AWD. The ratoon crop generated emissions from 39.7 to 50.7 kg CH<sub>4</sub>-C ha<sup>−1</sup>, up to a 3.6-fold increase from the main crop of the same year. CH<sub>4</sub> emissions from the ratoon crop in this study were much lower than those found in previous ratoon studies. The ratoon crop yield was 13% that of the main crop yield on average but there was no significant difference in yield between irrigation treatments for the main seasons.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7512,"journal":{"name":"Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment","volume":"356 ","pages":"Article 108652"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The effect of water management and ratoon rice cropping on methane emissions and yield in Arkansas\",\"authors\":\"Marguerita Leavitt ,&nbsp;Beatriz Moreno-García ,&nbsp;Colby W. Reavis ,&nbsp;Michele L. Reba ,&nbsp;Benjamin R.K. Runkle\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.agee.2023.108652\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p><span>Sustainable intensification of rice farming is crucial to meeting human food needs while reducing environmental impacts. Rice production represents 8% of all anthropogenic emissions of CH</span><sub>4</sub><span>, a potent greenhouse gas. Cultivation practices that minimize the number of days the rice fields<span> are flooded, such as irrigation using the alternate wetting and drying (AWD) technique instead of continuous flooding (DF) can potentially reduce CH</span></span><sub>4</sub> emissions. Ratoon cropping, wherein a second crop of rice is grown from the harvested stubble of the first crop, can produce additional yield with minimal labor but may generate more CH<sub>4</sub> than single cropping. The objectives of this study were first to test different water management regimes for their impact on yield and CH<sub>4</sub> emissions, and second to investigate CH<sub>4</sub> emissions from a ratoon crop and perform an exploratory economic analysis of ratoon cropping. Two adjacent fields in Lonoke County, Arkansas were compared under different irrigation treatments from 2015 through 2020; the 2020 season also included a ratoon crop. Field-scale CH<sub>4</sub><span> emissions were measured using the eddy covariance method at each field. AWD reduced CH</span><sub>4</sub> emissions by 79.5% on average in comparison to DF for the main seasons. Across the field-seasons, the emissions from the main crop ranged from 77.2 to 132.5 kg CH<sub>4</sub>-C ha<sup>−1</sup> under DF and from 7.1 to 40.7 kg CH<sub>4</sub>-C ha<sup>−1</sup> under AWD. The ratoon crop generated emissions from 39.7 to 50.7 kg CH<sub>4</sub>-C ha<sup>−1</sup>, up to a 3.6-fold increase from the main crop of the same year. CH<sub>4</sub> emissions from the ratoon crop in this study were much lower than those found in previous ratoon studies. The ratoon crop yield was 13% that of the main crop yield on average but there was no significant difference in yield between irrigation treatments for the main seasons.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7512,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment\",\"volume\":\"356 \",\"pages\":\"Article 108652\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167880923003110\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167880923003110","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

水稻种植的可持续集约化对于满足人类粮食需求同时减少对环境的影响至关重要。水稻产量占甲烷(一种强效温室气体)所有人为排放量的8%。尽量减少稻田被淹天数的耕作方法,例如使用交替干湿交替(AWD)技术而不是连续淹水(DF)进行灌溉,可以潜在地减少CH4排放。Ratoon种植,其中第二茬水稻是从第一茬收获的残茬中种植的,可以用最少的劳动力生产额外的产量,但可能比单一种植产生更多的CH4。本研究的目的首先是测试不同的水管理制度对产量和CH4排放的影响,其次是调查再生作物的CH4排放,并对再生作物进行探索性经济分析。从2015年到2020年,阿肯色州洛诺克县的两块相邻田地在不同的灌溉处理下进行了比较;2020年的季节还包括再生植株。使用涡流协方差法测量每个场的场尺度CH4排放量。与主要季节的DF相比,AWD平均减少了79.5%的CH4排放。在整个田间季节,主要作物的排放量在DF下为77.2至132.5 kg CH4-C ha−1,在AWD下为7.1至40.7 kg CH4-C ha−1。再生作物的排放量从39.7千克CH4-C ha−1增加到50.7千克,比同年的主要作物增加了3.6倍。本研究中再生作物的CH4排放量远低于先前再生作物研究中发现的排放量。再生作物产量平均为主要作物产量的13%,但主要季节灌溉处理之间的产量没有显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The effect of water management and ratoon rice cropping on methane emissions and yield in Arkansas

Sustainable intensification of rice farming is crucial to meeting human food needs while reducing environmental impacts. Rice production represents 8% of all anthropogenic emissions of CH4, a potent greenhouse gas. Cultivation practices that minimize the number of days the rice fields are flooded, such as irrigation using the alternate wetting and drying (AWD) technique instead of continuous flooding (DF) can potentially reduce CH4 emissions. Ratoon cropping, wherein a second crop of rice is grown from the harvested stubble of the first crop, can produce additional yield with minimal labor but may generate more CH4 than single cropping. The objectives of this study were first to test different water management regimes for their impact on yield and CH4 emissions, and second to investigate CH4 emissions from a ratoon crop and perform an exploratory economic analysis of ratoon cropping. Two adjacent fields in Lonoke County, Arkansas were compared under different irrigation treatments from 2015 through 2020; the 2020 season also included a ratoon crop. Field-scale CH4 emissions were measured using the eddy covariance method at each field. AWD reduced CH4 emissions by 79.5% on average in comparison to DF for the main seasons. Across the field-seasons, the emissions from the main crop ranged from 77.2 to 132.5 kg CH4-C ha−1 under DF and from 7.1 to 40.7 kg CH4-C ha−1 under AWD. The ratoon crop generated emissions from 39.7 to 50.7 kg CH4-C ha−1, up to a 3.6-fold increase from the main crop of the same year. CH4 emissions from the ratoon crop in this study were much lower than those found in previous ratoon studies. The ratoon crop yield was 13% that of the main crop yield on average but there was no significant difference in yield between irrigation treatments for the main seasons.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment
Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
11.70
自引率
9.10%
发文量
392
审稿时长
26 days
期刊介绍: Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment publishes scientific articles dealing with the interface between agroecosystems and the natural environment, specifically how agriculture influences the environment and how changes in that environment impact agroecosystems. Preference is given to papers from experimental and observational research at the field, system or landscape level, from studies that enhance our understanding of processes using data-based biophysical modelling, and papers that bridge scientific disciplines and integrate knowledge. All papers should be placed in an international or wide comparative context.
期刊最新文献
Agricultural land use modulates responses of soil biota and multifunctionality to increased antibiotic pressures Temperate grasslands under climate extremes: Effects of plant diversity on ecosystem services Phosphorus leaching in high-P soils under maize silage and interseeding cover crop system Trade-offs and synergies of food-water-land benefits for crop rotation optimization in Northeast China Water and sediment regulation eluting and washland planting lead to nitrogen increase in the lower reaches of the Yellow River
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1