基于决策树模型预测大学区交通方式选择偏好

IF 3.9 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES City and Environment Interactions Pub Date : 2023-08-19 DOI:10.1016/j.cacint.2023.100118
Jenny Díaz-Ramírez , Juan Alberto Estrada-García , Juliana Figueroa-Sayago
{"title":"基于决策树模型预测大学区交通方式选择偏好","authors":"Jenny Díaz-Ramírez ,&nbsp;Juan Alberto Estrada-García ,&nbsp;Juliana Figueroa-Sayago","doi":"10.1016/j.cacint.2023.100118","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Modeling and prediction of mode choice are essential to support more sustainable and safer transportation decisions. There is plenty of literature in this decade showing that machine learning (ML) models have been effective predicting techniques, although not easily interpretable. When these techniques are used, there is a lack of connection with the data-gathering step, which is crucial to the technique selection and appropriate analysis of results. Based on a systematic literature review on mode choice studies, we present a methodology that interconnects the data-gathering process as a fundamental part of the descriptive phase when ML classification methods are used to predict mode choice preferences. The case study presented occurs in a university context whose descriptive phase shows interesting behavior patterns and highly imbalanced data in terms of mode choice. We show how decision tree methods allow us to tackle this issue in a contextualized manner and permit sensitivity analysis to test policies promoting changes in the modal split that aim for more sustainable mobility for the community of the university.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":52395,"journal":{"name":"City and Environment Interactions","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Predicting transport mode choice preferences in a university district with decision tree-based models\",\"authors\":\"Jenny Díaz-Ramírez ,&nbsp;Juan Alberto Estrada-García ,&nbsp;Juliana Figueroa-Sayago\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cacint.2023.100118\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Modeling and prediction of mode choice are essential to support more sustainable and safer transportation decisions. There is plenty of literature in this decade showing that machine learning (ML) models have been effective predicting techniques, although not easily interpretable. When these techniques are used, there is a lack of connection with the data-gathering step, which is crucial to the technique selection and appropriate analysis of results. Based on a systematic literature review on mode choice studies, we present a methodology that interconnects the data-gathering process as a fundamental part of the descriptive phase when ML classification methods are used to predict mode choice preferences. The case study presented occurs in a university context whose descriptive phase shows interesting behavior patterns and highly imbalanced data in terms of mode choice. We show how decision tree methods allow us to tackle this issue in a contextualized manner and permit sensitivity analysis to test policies promoting changes in the modal split that aim for more sustainable mobility for the community of the university.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":52395,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"City and Environment Interactions\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"City and Environment Interactions\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S259025202300020X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"City and Environment Interactions","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S259025202300020X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

模式选择的建模和预测对于支持更可持续、更安全的交通决策至关重要。在这十年里,有大量文献表明,机器学习(ML)模型是有效的预测技术,尽管不容易解释。当使用这些技术时,缺乏与数据收集步骤的联系,这对技术选择和结果的适当分析至关重要。基于对模式选择研究的系统文献综述,我们提出了一种方法,当ML分类方法用于预测模式选择偏好时,该方法将数据收集过程作为描述阶段的基本部分进行互连。案例研究发生在一所大学的背景下,其描述阶段显示出有趣的行为模式和在模式选择方面高度不平衡的数据。我们展示了决策树方法如何使我们能够以情境化的方式解决这个问题,并允许敏感性分析来测试促进模式划分变化的政策,以实现大学社区更可持续的流动性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Predicting transport mode choice preferences in a university district with decision tree-based models

Modeling and prediction of mode choice are essential to support more sustainable and safer transportation decisions. There is plenty of literature in this decade showing that machine learning (ML) models have been effective predicting techniques, although not easily interpretable. When these techniques are used, there is a lack of connection with the data-gathering step, which is crucial to the technique selection and appropriate analysis of results. Based on a systematic literature review on mode choice studies, we present a methodology that interconnects the data-gathering process as a fundamental part of the descriptive phase when ML classification methods are used to predict mode choice preferences. The case study presented occurs in a university context whose descriptive phase shows interesting behavior patterns and highly imbalanced data in terms of mode choice. We show how decision tree methods allow us to tackle this issue in a contextualized manner and permit sensitivity analysis to test policies promoting changes in the modal split that aim for more sustainable mobility for the community of the university.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
City and Environment Interactions
City and Environment Interactions Social Sciences-Urban Studies
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
3.00%
发文量
15
审稿时长
27 days
期刊最新文献
Climate change hazards and the resilience of coastal cities in the Gulf Cooperation Council countries: A systematic review Health impact assessment of exposure to road traffic noise and air pollution according to pre- and post-densification scenarios in Helsingborg, Sweden Mapping heat-related risks in Swiss cities under different urban tree scenarios Assessing the degree of personal exposure to PM2.5 in growing cities of Rwanda based on time-activity patterns and microenvironments Indoor heat in Amsterdam: Comparing observed indoor air temperatures from a professional network and from a citizen science approach
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1