混合以限制ECMO中的OxygEN:随机对照注册(BLENDER)试验:研究方案和统计分析计划

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Critical Care and Resuscitation Pub Date : 2023-09-01 DOI:10.1016/j.ccrj.2023.06.001
Aidan Burrell PhD , Sze Ng MBBS , Kelly Ottosen MHealthSc , Michael Bailey PhD , Hergen Buscher MD , John Fraser PhD , Andrew Udy PhD , David Gattas MMed(ClinEpi) , Richard Totaro MBBS , Rinaldo Bellomo PhD , Paul Forrest MBChB , Emma Martin BpharmSc , Liadain Reid MPH , Marc Ziegenfuss MBBS , Glenn Eastwood PhD , Alisa Higgins PhD , Carol Hodgson PhD , Edward Litton PhD , Priya Nair PhD , Neil Orford PhD , David Pilcher MBBS
{"title":"混合以限制ECMO中的OxygEN:随机对照注册(BLENDER)试验:研究方案和统计分析计划","authors":"Aidan Burrell PhD ,&nbsp;Sze Ng MBBS ,&nbsp;Kelly Ottosen MHealthSc ,&nbsp;Michael Bailey PhD ,&nbsp;Hergen Buscher MD ,&nbsp;John Fraser PhD ,&nbsp;Andrew Udy PhD ,&nbsp;David Gattas MMed(ClinEpi) ,&nbsp;Richard Totaro MBBS ,&nbsp;Rinaldo Bellomo PhD ,&nbsp;Paul Forrest MBChB ,&nbsp;Emma Martin BpharmSc ,&nbsp;Liadain Reid MPH ,&nbsp;Marc Ziegenfuss MBBS ,&nbsp;Glenn Eastwood PhD ,&nbsp;Alisa Higgins PhD ,&nbsp;Carol Hodgson PhD ,&nbsp;Edward Litton PhD ,&nbsp;Priya Nair PhD ,&nbsp;Neil Orford PhD ,&nbsp;David Pilcher MBBS","doi":"10.1016/j.ccrj.2023.06.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Critically ill patients supported with venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA ECMO) are at risk of developing severe arterial hyperoxia, which has been associated with increased mortality. Lower saturation targets in this population may lead to deleterious episodes of severe hypoxia. This manuscript describes the protocol and statistical analysis plan for the Blend to Limit OxygEN in ECMO: A RanDomised ControllEd Registry (BLENDER) Trial.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>The BLENDER trial is a pragmatic, multicentre, registry-embedded, randomised clinical trial., registered at <span>ClinicalTrials.gov</span><svg><path></path></svg> (NCT03841084) and approved by The Alfred Hospital Ethics Committee project ID HREC/50486/Alfred-2019.</p></div><div><h3>Participants and setting</h3><p>Patients supported by VA ECMO for cardiogenic shock or cardiac arrest who are enrolled in the Australian national ECMO registry.</p></div><div><h3>Intervention</h3><p>The study compares a conservative oxygenation strategy (target arterial saturations 92–96%) with a liberal oxygenation strategy (target 97–100%).</p></div><div><h3>Main Outcome Measures</h3><p>The primary outcome is the number of intensive care unit (ICU)-free days for patients alive at day 60. Secondary outcomes include duration of mechanical ventilation, ICU and hospital mortality, the number of hypoxic episodes, neurocognitive outcomes, and health economic analyses. The 300-patient sample size enables us to detect a 3-day difference in ICU-free days at day 60, assuming a mean ICU-free days of 11 days, with a risk of type 1 error of 5% and power of 80%. Data will be analysed according to a predefined analysis plan. Findings will be disseminated in peer-reviewed publications.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>This paper details the protocol and statistical analysis plan for the BLENDER trial, a registry-embedded, multicentre interventional trial comparing liberal and conservative oxygenation strategies in VA ECMO.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49215,"journal":{"name":"Critical Care and Resuscitation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Blend to Limit OxygEN in ECMO: A RanDomised ControllEd Registry (BLENDER) Trial: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan\",\"authors\":\"Aidan Burrell PhD ,&nbsp;Sze Ng MBBS ,&nbsp;Kelly Ottosen MHealthSc ,&nbsp;Michael Bailey PhD ,&nbsp;Hergen Buscher MD ,&nbsp;John Fraser PhD ,&nbsp;Andrew Udy PhD ,&nbsp;David Gattas MMed(ClinEpi) ,&nbsp;Richard Totaro MBBS ,&nbsp;Rinaldo Bellomo PhD ,&nbsp;Paul Forrest MBChB ,&nbsp;Emma Martin BpharmSc ,&nbsp;Liadain Reid MPH ,&nbsp;Marc Ziegenfuss MBBS ,&nbsp;Glenn Eastwood PhD ,&nbsp;Alisa Higgins PhD ,&nbsp;Carol Hodgson PhD ,&nbsp;Edward Litton PhD ,&nbsp;Priya Nair PhD ,&nbsp;Neil Orford PhD ,&nbsp;David Pilcher MBBS\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ccrj.2023.06.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Critically ill patients supported with venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA ECMO) are at risk of developing severe arterial hyperoxia, which has been associated with increased mortality. Lower saturation targets in this population may lead to deleterious episodes of severe hypoxia. This manuscript describes the protocol and statistical analysis plan for the Blend to Limit OxygEN in ECMO: A RanDomised ControllEd Registry (BLENDER) Trial.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>The BLENDER trial is a pragmatic, multicentre, registry-embedded, randomised clinical trial., registered at <span>ClinicalTrials.gov</span><svg><path></path></svg> (NCT03841084) and approved by The Alfred Hospital Ethics Committee project ID HREC/50486/Alfred-2019.</p></div><div><h3>Participants and setting</h3><p>Patients supported by VA ECMO for cardiogenic shock or cardiac arrest who are enrolled in the Australian national ECMO registry.</p></div><div><h3>Intervention</h3><p>The study compares a conservative oxygenation strategy (target arterial saturations 92–96%) with a liberal oxygenation strategy (target 97–100%).</p></div><div><h3>Main Outcome Measures</h3><p>The primary outcome is the number of intensive care unit (ICU)-free days for patients alive at day 60. Secondary outcomes include duration of mechanical ventilation, ICU and hospital mortality, the number of hypoxic episodes, neurocognitive outcomes, and health economic analyses. The 300-patient sample size enables us to detect a 3-day difference in ICU-free days at day 60, assuming a mean ICU-free days of 11 days, with a risk of type 1 error of 5% and power of 80%. Data will be analysed according to a predefined analysis plan. Findings will be disseminated in peer-reviewed publications.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>This paper details the protocol and statistical analysis plan for the BLENDER trial, a registry-embedded, multicentre interventional trial comparing liberal and conservative oxygenation strategies in VA ECMO.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49215,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Critical Care and Resuscitation\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Critical Care and Resuscitation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1441277223000224\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Care and Resuscitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1441277223000224","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

引言采用体外膜肺氧合(VA ECMO)支持的危重患者有发展为严重动脉高氧的风险,这与死亡率增加有关。该人群中较低的饱和靶点可能导致严重缺氧的有害发作。这篇手稿描述了ECMO中混合限制OxygEN的方案和统计分析计划:随机对照注册(BLENDER)试验。设计BLENDER试验是一项实用、多中心、注册嵌入的随机临床试验。,注册于ClinicalTrials.gov(NCT03841084),并经阿尔弗雷德医院伦理委员会项目ID HREC/50486/Alfred-2019批准。参与者和设置在澳大利亚国家ECMO注册中心注册的VA ECMO支持的心源性休克或心脏骤停患者。干预该研究比较了保守的氧合策略(目标动脉饱和度92–96%)和自由的氧合战略(目标97–100%)。主要结果测量主要结果是患者在第60天无重症监护室(ICU)的天数。次要结果包括机械通气持续时间、ICU和医院死亡率、缺氧发作次数、神经认知结果和健康经济分析。300名患者的样本量使我们能够在第60天检测到无ICU天数的3天差异,假设平均无ICU天数为11天,1型错误的风险为5%,幂为80%。数据将根据预定义的分析计划进行分析。调查结果将在同行评审的出版物中散发。结论本文详细介绍了BLENDER试验的方案和统计分析计划,这是一项注册嵌入式多中心介入试验,比较了VA ECMO中自由和保守的氧合策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Blend to Limit OxygEN in ECMO: A RanDomised ControllEd Registry (BLENDER) Trial: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan

Introduction

Critically ill patients supported with venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA ECMO) are at risk of developing severe arterial hyperoxia, which has been associated with increased mortality. Lower saturation targets in this population may lead to deleterious episodes of severe hypoxia. This manuscript describes the protocol and statistical analysis plan for the Blend to Limit OxygEN in ECMO: A RanDomised ControllEd Registry (BLENDER) Trial.

Design

The BLENDER trial is a pragmatic, multicentre, registry-embedded, randomised clinical trial., registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03841084) and approved by The Alfred Hospital Ethics Committee project ID HREC/50486/Alfred-2019.

Participants and setting

Patients supported by VA ECMO for cardiogenic shock or cardiac arrest who are enrolled in the Australian national ECMO registry.

Intervention

The study compares a conservative oxygenation strategy (target arterial saturations 92–96%) with a liberal oxygenation strategy (target 97–100%).

Main Outcome Measures

The primary outcome is the number of intensive care unit (ICU)-free days for patients alive at day 60. Secondary outcomes include duration of mechanical ventilation, ICU and hospital mortality, the number of hypoxic episodes, neurocognitive outcomes, and health economic analyses. The 300-patient sample size enables us to detect a 3-day difference in ICU-free days at day 60, assuming a mean ICU-free days of 11 days, with a risk of type 1 error of 5% and power of 80%. Data will be analysed according to a predefined analysis plan. Findings will be disseminated in peer-reviewed publications.

Conclusions

This paper details the protocol and statistical analysis plan for the BLENDER trial, a registry-embedded, multicentre interventional trial comparing liberal and conservative oxygenation strategies in VA ECMO.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Critical Care and Resuscitation
Critical Care and Resuscitation CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE-
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
3.40%
发文量
44
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: ritical Care and Resuscitation (CC&R) is the official scientific journal of the College of Intensive Care Medicine (CICM). The Journal is a quarterly publication (ISSN 1441-2772) with original articles of scientific and clinical interest in the specialities of Critical Care, Intensive Care, Anaesthesia, Emergency Medicine and related disciplines. The Journal is received by all Fellows and trainees, along with an increasing number of subscribers from around the world. The CC&R Journal currently has an impact factor of 3.3, placing it in 8th position in world critical care journals and in first position in the world outside the USA and Europe.
期刊最新文献
Recommendations for the College of Intensive Care Medicine (CICM) trainee research project: A modified Delphi study ARDS, guidelines and ANZ practice: The persistent disconnect Management of severe acute respiratory distress syndrome in Australia and New Zealand (SAGE-ANZ): An observational study Sonographic evaluation of intracranial hemodynamics and pressure after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: An exploratory sub-study of the TAME trial A retrospective registry-based study into the proportion of patients admitted to intensive care who have anaphylaxis as a principal diagnosis and their outcomes in Australia and New Zealand
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1