虚假确定性是基于计算机的在线搜索和内容学习中知识获取的不良副作用

IF 8.9 1区 教育学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS Computers & Education Pub Date : 2023-09-20 DOI:10.1016/j.compedu.2023.104930
Johannes F. von Hoyer , Joachim Kimmerle , Ulrike Cress , Peter Holtz
{"title":"虚假确定性是基于计算机的在线搜索和内容学习中知识获取的不良副作用","authors":"Johannes F. von Hoyer ,&nbsp;Joachim Kimmerle ,&nbsp;Ulrike Cress ,&nbsp;Peter Holtz","doi":"10.1016/j.compedu.2023.104930","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Previous research has shown that learners’ subjective certainty in the assumed correctness of their false answers to a knowledge test increased after online learning. It is unclear, however, 1) whether this False Certainty Effect (FaCE) results from online learning per se, or 2) whether a FaCE results from people confusing their own knowledge with information available on the internet while searching the internet, and 3) whether any topic-directed activity can result in a FaCE, even if it is not obviously topic related. We conducted two computer-based experiments to answer these questions. In Experiment 1, participants (<em>N</em> = 135) were randomly assigned to either an online-search learning condition, a computer-based content-learning condition with pre-selected learning material, or a computer-based topic-exploration condition with no learning-relevant information. Across all conditions, there was an increase in false certainty after the activity. The FaCE was equally strong in the two learning conditions (online search and content learning) and minimal in the non-learning condition. In Experiment 2 (<em>N</em> = 87), we replicated the FaCE for a learning activity with pre-selected materials but did not find a spill-over effect to an unrelated topic. These results indicate that the FaCE is primarily an unwanted side effect of the knowledge acquisition that arises from brief computer-based learning activities.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":10568,"journal":{"name":"Computers & Education","volume":"208 ","pages":"Article 104930"},"PeriodicalIF":8.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"False certainty as an unwanted side effect of knowledge acquisition in computer-based online search and content learning\",\"authors\":\"Johannes F. von Hoyer ,&nbsp;Joachim Kimmerle ,&nbsp;Ulrike Cress ,&nbsp;Peter Holtz\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.compedu.2023.104930\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Previous research has shown that learners’ subjective certainty in the assumed correctness of their false answers to a knowledge test increased after online learning. It is unclear, however, 1) whether this False Certainty Effect (FaCE) results from online learning per se, or 2) whether a FaCE results from people confusing their own knowledge with information available on the internet while searching the internet, and 3) whether any topic-directed activity can result in a FaCE, even if it is not obviously topic related. We conducted two computer-based experiments to answer these questions. In Experiment 1, participants (<em>N</em> = 135) were randomly assigned to either an online-search learning condition, a computer-based content-learning condition with pre-selected learning material, or a computer-based topic-exploration condition with no learning-relevant information. Across all conditions, there was an increase in false certainty after the activity. The FaCE was equally strong in the two learning conditions (online search and content learning) and minimal in the non-learning condition. In Experiment 2 (<em>N</em> = 87), we replicated the FaCE for a learning activity with pre-selected materials but did not find a spill-over effect to an unrelated topic. These results indicate that the FaCE is primarily an unwanted side effect of the knowledge acquisition that arises from brief computer-based learning activities.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10568,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Computers & Education\",\"volume\":\"208 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104930\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Computers & Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360131523002075\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers & Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360131523002075","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

先前的研究表明,在线学习后,学习者对知识测试错误答案假设正确性的主观确定性增加。然而,目前尚不清楚1)这种虚假确定性效应(FaCE)是否源于在线学习本身,或2)FaCE是否源于人们在搜索互联网时将自己的知识与互联网上可用的信息混淆,以及3)任何主题导向的活动是否会导致FaCE,即使它显然与主题无关。我们进行了两个基于计算机的实验来回答这些问题。在实验1中,参与者(N=135)被随机分配到在线搜索学习条件、具有预先选择的学习材料的基于计算机的内容学习条件或不具有学习相关信息的基于计算机主题探索条件。在所有情况下,活动后的虚假确定性都有所增加。FaCE在两种学习条件(在线搜索和内容学习)下同样强大,在非学习条件下最小。在实验2中(N=87),我们用预先选择的材料复制了学习活动的FaCE,但没有发现对无关主题的溢出效应。这些结果表明,FaCE主要是由简短的基于计算机的学习活动引起的知识获取的不必要的副作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
False certainty as an unwanted side effect of knowledge acquisition in computer-based online search and content learning

Previous research has shown that learners’ subjective certainty in the assumed correctness of their false answers to a knowledge test increased after online learning. It is unclear, however, 1) whether this False Certainty Effect (FaCE) results from online learning per se, or 2) whether a FaCE results from people confusing their own knowledge with information available on the internet while searching the internet, and 3) whether any topic-directed activity can result in a FaCE, even if it is not obviously topic related. We conducted two computer-based experiments to answer these questions. In Experiment 1, participants (N = 135) were randomly assigned to either an online-search learning condition, a computer-based content-learning condition with pre-selected learning material, or a computer-based topic-exploration condition with no learning-relevant information. Across all conditions, there was an increase in false certainty after the activity. The FaCE was equally strong in the two learning conditions (online search and content learning) and minimal in the non-learning condition. In Experiment 2 (N = 87), we replicated the FaCE for a learning activity with pre-selected materials but did not find a spill-over effect to an unrelated topic. These results indicate that the FaCE is primarily an unwanted side effect of the knowledge acquisition that arises from brief computer-based learning activities.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Computers & Education
Computers & Education 工程技术-计算机:跨学科应用
CiteScore
27.10
自引率
5.80%
发文量
204
审稿时长
42 days
期刊介绍: Computers & Education seeks to advance understanding of how digital technology can improve education by publishing high-quality research that expands both theory and practice. The journal welcomes research papers exploring the pedagogical applications of digital technology, with a focus broad enough to appeal to the wider education community.
期刊最新文献
Unpacking help-seeking process through multimodal learning analytics: A comparative study of ChatGPT vs Human expert A meta-analysis on the effect of technology on the achievement of less advantaged students Personalization in educational gamification: Learners with different trait competitiveness benefit differently from rankings on leaderboards Plugging in at school: Do schools nurture digital skills and narrow digital skills inequality? Reducing interpretative ambiguity in an educational environment with ChatGPT
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1