Mathan V. Manmatharajan , Edouardine-Pascale Ingabire , Alex Sy , Mason Ghafghazi
{"title":"粒径及粒径分布对颗粒土液化后强度的影响","authors":"Mathan V. Manmatharajan , Edouardine-Pascale Ingabire , Alex Sy , Mason Ghafghazi","doi":"10.1016/j.sandf.2023.101336","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In practice, post-liquefaction strength is largely determined from case histories, but the case history database is limited and there are gaps in the information available in each case. As a result, laboratory tests have continued to play a key role in determining how various factors influence post-liquefaction strength. This paper presents an investigation into how factors such as particle size, particle size distribution, fines content, and compressibility influence post-liquefaction strength in simple shear tests. Eleven particle size distributions of a natural soil and a tailings material, ranging from silt to fine gravel, were studied. The results were compared with case histories.</p><p>Materials of different geologic origins have meaningfully different post-liquefaction strengths. Particle size and particle size distributions were both found to significantly affect post-liquefaction response as well. Post-liquefaction strengths obtained from simple shear tests agreed well with those back calculated from case histories. Laboratory testing can be utilized to determine how the post-liquefaction strength of a given material may compare to the case history database, and can be used to guide design decisions. This is an important practical finding, given the sparse case history database.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":21857,"journal":{"name":"Soils and Foundations","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of particle size and particle size distribution on the post-liquefaction strength of granular soils\",\"authors\":\"Mathan V. Manmatharajan , Edouardine-Pascale Ingabire , Alex Sy , Mason Ghafghazi\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.sandf.2023.101336\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>In practice, post-liquefaction strength is largely determined from case histories, but the case history database is limited and there are gaps in the information available in each case. As a result, laboratory tests have continued to play a key role in determining how various factors influence post-liquefaction strength. This paper presents an investigation into how factors such as particle size, particle size distribution, fines content, and compressibility influence post-liquefaction strength in simple shear tests. Eleven particle size distributions of a natural soil and a tailings material, ranging from silt to fine gravel, were studied. The results were compared with case histories.</p><p>Materials of different geologic origins have meaningfully different post-liquefaction strengths. Particle size and particle size distributions were both found to significantly affect post-liquefaction response as well. Post-liquefaction strengths obtained from simple shear tests agreed well with those back calculated from case histories. Laboratory testing can be utilized to determine how the post-liquefaction strength of a given material may compare to the case history database, and can be used to guide design decisions. This is an important practical finding, given the sparse case history database.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21857,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Soils and Foundations\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Soils and Foundations\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0038080623000653\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Soils and Foundations","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0038080623000653","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Effect of particle size and particle size distribution on the post-liquefaction strength of granular soils
In practice, post-liquefaction strength is largely determined from case histories, but the case history database is limited and there are gaps in the information available in each case. As a result, laboratory tests have continued to play a key role in determining how various factors influence post-liquefaction strength. This paper presents an investigation into how factors such as particle size, particle size distribution, fines content, and compressibility influence post-liquefaction strength in simple shear tests. Eleven particle size distributions of a natural soil and a tailings material, ranging from silt to fine gravel, were studied. The results were compared with case histories.
Materials of different geologic origins have meaningfully different post-liquefaction strengths. Particle size and particle size distributions were both found to significantly affect post-liquefaction response as well. Post-liquefaction strengths obtained from simple shear tests agreed well with those back calculated from case histories. Laboratory testing can be utilized to determine how the post-liquefaction strength of a given material may compare to the case history database, and can be used to guide design decisions. This is an important practical finding, given the sparse case history database.
期刊介绍:
Soils and Foundations is one of the leading journals in the field of soil mechanics and geotechnical engineering. It is the official journal of the Japanese Geotechnical Society (JGS)., The journal publishes a variety of original research paper, technical reports, technical notes, as well as the state-of-the-art reports upon invitation by the Editor, in the fields of soil and rock mechanics, geotechnical engineering, and environmental geotechnics. Since the publication of Volume 1, No.1 issue in June 1960, Soils and Foundations will celebrate the 60th anniversary in the year of 2020.
Soils and Foundations welcomes theoretical as well as practical work associated with the aforementioned field(s). Case studies that describe the original and interdisciplinary work applicable to geotechnical engineering are particularly encouraged. Discussions to each of the published articles are also welcomed in order to provide an avenue in which opinions of peers may be fed back or exchanged. In providing latest expertise on a specific topic, one issue out of six per year on average was allocated to include selected papers from the International Symposia which were held in Japan as well as overseas.