原位水泥搅拌格墙加固可液化地基的动力特性

IF 3.3 2区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL Soils and Foundations Pub Date : 2023-08-01 DOI:10.1016/j.sandf.2023.101352
Kenji Watanabe , Tengfei Wang , Masahiro Ishikawa , Masatoshi Iijima , Shingo Mihira
{"title":"原位水泥搅拌格墙加固可液化地基的动力特性","authors":"Kenji Watanabe ,&nbsp;Tengfei Wang ,&nbsp;Masahiro Ishikawa ,&nbsp;Masatoshi Iijima ,&nbsp;Shingo Mihira","doi":"10.1016/j.sandf.2023.101352","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In-situ cement-mixing lattice-shaped ground improvement (lattice wall) is one of the effective countermeasures for liquefiable grounds. However, its high cost hinders its wide applicability. This is mainly due to the conventional concept of seismic designs which do not allow any liquefaction of the ground against earthquakes.</p><p>The recent seismic design code was revised to comply with the concept of performance-based design, which allows some displacement or slight damage to structures, such as pile foundations, during major earthquakes. In order to apply lattice walls to meet the concept of the recent design standard, especially against major earthquakes, it is necessary to establish a rational design method that considers the quantitative effect of lattice walls.</p><p>In this study, therefore, a series of 1-g field shaking table tests was performed with a lattice wall, and the effect of the wall was carefully evaluated through the quantitative measurement of the stress–strain relationship of the liquefiable ground inside the lattice wall and in the free ground (without a lattice wall). It became possible to quantitatively examine the effect of the wall by installing small accelerometers into the ground with precision.</p><p>Two major positive effects of the lattice wall were observed through the series of shaking table tests. One was the delay in the onset of liquefaction by the restriction of shear strain, and the other was the recovery of the shear stiffness of the ground even after the onset of liquefaction. These experimental results indicate that lattice walls can be applied as an effective liquefaction countermeasure method, especially when the performance-based design is applied to address large earthquakes.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":21857,"journal":{"name":"Soils and Foundations","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dynamic behavior of liquefiable ground reinforced by in-situ cement-mixing lattice wall\",\"authors\":\"Kenji Watanabe ,&nbsp;Tengfei Wang ,&nbsp;Masahiro Ishikawa ,&nbsp;Masatoshi Iijima ,&nbsp;Shingo Mihira\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.sandf.2023.101352\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>In-situ cement-mixing lattice-shaped ground improvement (lattice wall) is one of the effective countermeasures for liquefiable grounds. However, its high cost hinders its wide applicability. This is mainly due to the conventional concept of seismic designs which do not allow any liquefaction of the ground against earthquakes.</p><p>The recent seismic design code was revised to comply with the concept of performance-based design, which allows some displacement or slight damage to structures, such as pile foundations, during major earthquakes. In order to apply lattice walls to meet the concept of the recent design standard, especially against major earthquakes, it is necessary to establish a rational design method that considers the quantitative effect of lattice walls.</p><p>In this study, therefore, a series of 1-g field shaking table tests was performed with a lattice wall, and the effect of the wall was carefully evaluated through the quantitative measurement of the stress–strain relationship of the liquefiable ground inside the lattice wall and in the free ground (without a lattice wall). It became possible to quantitatively examine the effect of the wall by installing small accelerometers into the ground with precision.</p><p>Two major positive effects of the lattice wall were observed through the series of shaking table tests. One was the delay in the onset of liquefaction by the restriction of shear strain, and the other was the recovery of the shear stiffness of the ground even after the onset of liquefaction. These experimental results indicate that lattice walls can be applied as an effective liquefaction countermeasure method, especially when the performance-based design is applied to address large earthquakes.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21857,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Soils and Foundations\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Soils and Foundations\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0038080623000811\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Soils and Foundations","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0038080623000811","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

现浇水泥搅拌格构式地基改良(格构墙)是解决液化地基的有效措施之一。然而,它的高成本阻碍了它的广泛应用。这主要是由于抗震设计的传统概念不允许地面在地震中发生任何液化。最近的抗震设计规范进行了修订,以符合基于性能的设计概念,该概念允许在大地震期间对结构(如桩基)进行一些位移或轻微损坏。为了应用格构墙来满足最新设计标准的概念,特别是针对大地震,有必要建立一种考虑格构墙数量效应的合理设计方法。因此,在本研究中,使用格构墙进行了一系列1G现场振动台试验,并通过定量测量格构墙内和自由地面(无格构墙)中可液化地面的应力-应变关系,仔细评估了墙的影响。通过在地面上精确安装小型加速度计,可以定量检测墙壁的影响。通过一系列的振动台试验,观察到了格构墙的两个主要积极作用。一个是由于剪切应变的限制,液化开始的延迟,另一个是即使在液化开始后,地基的剪切刚度也会恢复。这些实验结果表明,格构墙可以作为一种有效的液化对策方法,特别是当基于性能的设计用于应对大地震时。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Dynamic behavior of liquefiable ground reinforced by in-situ cement-mixing lattice wall

In-situ cement-mixing lattice-shaped ground improvement (lattice wall) is one of the effective countermeasures for liquefiable grounds. However, its high cost hinders its wide applicability. This is mainly due to the conventional concept of seismic designs which do not allow any liquefaction of the ground against earthquakes.

The recent seismic design code was revised to comply with the concept of performance-based design, which allows some displacement or slight damage to structures, such as pile foundations, during major earthquakes. In order to apply lattice walls to meet the concept of the recent design standard, especially against major earthquakes, it is necessary to establish a rational design method that considers the quantitative effect of lattice walls.

In this study, therefore, a series of 1-g field shaking table tests was performed with a lattice wall, and the effect of the wall was carefully evaluated through the quantitative measurement of the stress–strain relationship of the liquefiable ground inside the lattice wall and in the free ground (without a lattice wall). It became possible to quantitatively examine the effect of the wall by installing small accelerometers into the ground with precision.

Two major positive effects of the lattice wall were observed through the series of shaking table tests. One was the delay in the onset of liquefaction by the restriction of shear strain, and the other was the recovery of the shear stiffness of the ground even after the onset of liquefaction. These experimental results indicate that lattice walls can be applied as an effective liquefaction countermeasure method, especially when the performance-based design is applied to address large earthquakes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Soils and Foundations
Soils and Foundations 工程技术-地球科学综合
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
8.10%
发文量
99
审稿时长
5 months
期刊介绍: Soils and Foundations is one of the leading journals in the field of soil mechanics and geotechnical engineering. It is the official journal of the Japanese Geotechnical Society (JGS)., The journal publishes a variety of original research paper, technical reports, technical notes, as well as the state-of-the-art reports upon invitation by the Editor, in the fields of soil and rock mechanics, geotechnical engineering, and environmental geotechnics. Since the publication of Volume 1, No.1 issue in June 1960, Soils and Foundations will celebrate the 60th anniversary in the year of 2020. Soils and Foundations welcomes theoretical as well as practical work associated with the aforementioned field(s). Case studies that describe the original and interdisciplinary work applicable to geotechnical engineering are particularly encouraged. Discussions to each of the published articles are also welcomed in order to provide an avenue in which opinions of peers may be fed back or exchanged. In providing latest expertise on a specific topic, one issue out of six per year on average was allocated to include selected papers from the International Symposia which were held in Japan as well as overseas.
期刊最新文献
Pseudo-dynamic bearing capacity of strip foundations on rock masses considering the Rayleigh surface waves Effect of silt uniformity on the liquefaction resistance of sand–silt mixtures Elastoplastic finite element simulation of domino fault formation associated with tilting of highly structured ground Improved SfM-MVS approach using artificial backgrounds Soil-water-air coupled finite deformation analysis considering trapped air and continuous air phases
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1