基于化学发光和机器学习的预混合氨-甲烷-空气火焰监测

Thibault F. Guiberti , Nader N. Shohdy , Santiago Cardona , Xuren Zhu , Laurent Selle , Corentin J. Lapeyre
{"title":"基于化学发光和机器学习的预混合氨-甲烷-空气火焰监测","authors":"Thibault F. Guiberti ,&nbsp;Nader N. Shohdy ,&nbsp;Santiago Cardona ,&nbsp;Xuren Zhu ,&nbsp;Laurent Selle ,&nbsp;Corentin J. Lapeyre","doi":"10.1016/j.jaecs.2023.100212","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This work presents the development and validation of an algorithm capable of predicting the equivalence ratio and the ammonia fraction of premixed ammonia-methane-air flames using only measured OH*, NH*, CN*, and CH* chemiluminescence intensities as input. This machine learning algorithm relies on Gaussian process regression (GPR). It was trained and validated with data previously recorded in laminar flames, and it was then tested with new data recorded in more practical, turbulent swirl flames. The algorithm performs well for laminar and turbulent flames for wide ranges of equivalence ratio (0.80 ≤ <em>ϕ</em> ≤ 1.20) and ammonia fraction (0 ≤ X<sub>NH3</sub> ≤ 0.60). For turbulent swirl flames, the prediction errors in the equivalence ratio and on the ammonia fraction are smaller than 0.05, except for a very small subset of operating conditions where the error is up to 0.10. Additional tests were performed by adding NO* and CO<sub>2</sub>* to the list of inputs, but this did not improve the predictions. The GPR algorithm was then benchmarked against linear and polynomial regressions and a more conventional way of inferring flame properties from chemiluminescence measurements, namely the ratio-based method. This method relies only on CN*/NO* and NH*/CH* ratios to predict the equivalence ratio and the ammonia fraction. Its prediction errors were often larger than 0.15, which is significantly worse than that of the GPR algorithm. Consequently, this work constitutes a solid basis for the future development of non-intrusive sensors to monitor practical ammonia-methane-air flames.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100104,"journal":{"name":"Applications in Energy and Combustion Science","volume":"16 ","pages":"Article 100212"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Chemiluminescence- and machine learning-based monitoring of premixed ammonia-methane-air flames\",\"authors\":\"Thibault F. Guiberti ,&nbsp;Nader N. Shohdy ,&nbsp;Santiago Cardona ,&nbsp;Xuren Zhu ,&nbsp;Laurent Selle ,&nbsp;Corentin J. Lapeyre\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jaecs.2023.100212\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This work presents the development and validation of an algorithm capable of predicting the equivalence ratio and the ammonia fraction of premixed ammonia-methane-air flames using only measured OH*, NH*, CN*, and CH* chemiluminescence intensities as input. This machine learning algorithm relies on Gaussian process regression (GPR). It was trained and validated with data previously recorded in laminar flames, and it was then tested with new data recorded in more practical, turbulent swirl flames. The algorithm performs well for laminar and turbulent flames for wide ranges of equivalence ratio (0.80 ≤ <em>ϕ</em> ≤ 1.20) and ammonia fraction (0 ≤ X<sub>NH3</sub> ≤ 0.60). For turbulent swirl flames, the prediction errors in the equivalence ratio and on the ammonia fraction are smaller than 0.05, except for a very small subset of operating conditions where the error is up to 0.10. Additional tests were performed by adding NO* and CO<sub>2</sub>* to the list of inputs, but this did not improve the predictions. The GPR algorithm was then benchmarked against linear and polynomial regressions and a more conventional way of inferring flame properties from chemiluminescence measurements, namely the ratio-based method. This method relies only on CN*/NO* and NH*/CH* ratios to predict the equivalence ratio and the ammonia fraction. Its prediction errors were often larger than 0.15, which is significantly worse than that of the GPR algorithm. Consequently, this work constitutes a solid basis for the future development of non-intrusive sensors to monitor practical ammonia-methane-air flames.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100104,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Applications in Energy and Combustion Science\",\"volume\":\"16 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100212\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Applications in Energy and Combustion Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666352X23001012\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applications in Energy and Combustion Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666352X23001012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这项工作介绍了一种算法的开发和验证,该算法能够仅使用测量的OH*、NH*、CN*和CH*化学发光强度作为输入来预测预混合氨-甲烷-空气火焰的当量比和氨分数。这种机器学习算法依赖于高斯过程回归(GPR)。它用之前在层流火焰中记录的数据进行了训练和验证,然后用在更实际的湍流涡流火焰中记录新数据进行了测试。对于层流和湍流火焰,该算法在当量比(0.80≤ξ≤1.20)和氨分数(0≤XNH3≤0.60)的宽范围内表现良好。对于湍流涡流火焰,当量比和氨分数的预测误差小于0.05,但误差高达0.10的极少数操作条件除外。通过在输入列表中添加NO*和CO2*进行了额外的测试,但这并没有改善预测。然后,将GPR算法与线性和多项式回归以及从化学发光测量推断火焰特性的更传统的方法(即基于比率的方法)进行对比。该方法仅依赖于CN*/NO*和NH*/CH*比率来预测当量比和氨分数。它的预测误差通常大于0.15,这明显比GPR算法的预测误差差。因此,这项工作为未来开发用于监测实际氨甲烷空气火焰的非侵入式传感器奠定了坚实的基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Chemiluminescence- and machine learning-based monitoring of premixed ammonia-methane-air flames

This work presents the development and validation of an algorithm capable of predicting the equivalence ratio and the ammonia fraction of premixed ammonia-methane-air flames using only measured OH*, NH*, CN*, and CH* chemiluminescence intensities as input. This machine learning algorithm relies on Gaussian process regression (GPR). It was trained and validated with data previously recorded in laminar flames, and it was then tested with new data recorded in more practical, turbulent swirl flames. The algorithm performs well for laminar and turbulent flames for wide ranges of equivalence ratio (0.80 ≤ ϕ ≤ 1.20) and ammonia fraction (0 ≤ XNH3 ≤ 0.60). For turbulent swirl flames, the prediction errors in the equivalence ratio and on the ammonia fraction are smaller than 0.05, except for a very small subset of operating conditions where the error is up to 0.10. Additional tests were performed by adding NO* and CO2* to the list of inputs, but this did not improve the predictions. The GPR algorithm was then benchmarked against linear and polynomial regressions and a more conventional way of inferring flame properties from chemiluminescence measurements, namely the ratio-based method. This method relies only on CN*/NO* and NH*/CH* ratios to predict the equivalence ratio and the ammonia fraction. Its prediction errors were often larger than 0.15, which is significantly worse than that of the GPR algorithm. Consequently, this work constitutes a solid basis for the future development of non-intrusive sensors to monitor practical ammonia-methane-air flames.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Spatiotemporal information propagation in confined supersonic reacting flows Clean energy technology: Hydro-processing of waste tyre pyrolysis oil (WTPO) to diesel fuel in a continuous reactor using Co/SBA-15 catalyst Aerosol ignition in iron powder flames stabilized on a new type of jet-in-hot-coflow burner Future technological directions for hydrogen internal combustion engines in transport applications Effect of flame temperature on structure and CO oxidation properties of Pt/CeO2 catalyst by flame-assisted spray pyrolysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1