在教师教育中促进认知科学的基本原理:解构流行的学习神话,推进基于研究的实践

IF 3.4 Q2 NEUROSCIENCES Trends in Neuroscience and Education Pub Date : 2023-09-07 DOI:10.1016/j.tine.2023.100209
Joshua A. Cuevas , Gina Childers , Bryan L. Dawson
{"title":"在教师教育中促进认知科学的基本原理:解构流行的学习神话,推进基于研究的实践","authors":"Joshua A. Cuevas ,&nbsp;Gina Childers ,&nbsp;Bryan L. Dawson","doi":"10.1016/j.tine.2023.100209","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>Cognitive science is essential to designing, implementing, and evaluating instruction for enhancing student learning. However, there may not be sufficient focus on the principles of cognitive science, as some educators hold learning beliefs that may be considered cognitive myths.</p></div><div><h3>Procedures</h3><p>This review article analyzes examples of five <em>learning myths</em> (learning styles, pure discovery learning, digital natives, extrinsic motivation, multitasking) and five <em>research-based learning strategies</em> (dual coding, direct instruction, summarization, retrieval practice, spacing). It details the research evidence for each to explain those misconceptions of learning and also those underutilized or misunderstood but effective strategies shown to benefit student learning.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Educational practices related to learning myths are widespread in education with potentially detrimental effects on student learning. We recommend that colleges of education be restructured to ensure greater emphasis on cognitive science in educator preparation programs to better promote research-based instructional strategies to meet students’ learning needs.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":46228,"journal":{"name":"Trends in Neuroscience and Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A rationale for promoting cognitive science in teacher education: Deconstructing prevailing learning myths and advancing research-based practices\",\"authors\":\"Joshua A. Cuevas ,&nbsp;Gina Childers ,&nbsp;Bryan L. Dawson\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.tine.2023.100209\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>Cognitive science is essential to designing, implementing, and evaluating instruction for enhancing student learning. However, there may not be sufficient focus on the principles of cognitive science, as some educators hold learning beliefs that may be considered cognitive myths.</p></div><div><h3>Procedures</h3><p>This review article analyzes examples of five <em>learning myths</em> (learning styles, pure discovery learning, digital natives, extrinsic motivation, multitasking) and five <em>research-based learning strategies</em> (dual coding, direct instruction, summarization, retrieval practice, spacing). It details the research evidence for each to explain those misconceptions of learning and also those underutilized or misunderstood but effective strategies shown to benefit student learning.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Educational practices related to learning myths are widespread in education with potentially detrimental effects on student learning. We recommend that colleges of education be restructured to ensure greater emphasis on cognitive science in educator preparation programs to better promote research-based instructional strategies to meet students’ learning needs.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46228,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Trends in Neuroscience and Education\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Trends in Neuroscience and Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211949323000121\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trends in Neuroscience and Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211949323000121","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

目的认知科学是设计、实施和评估教学以促进学生学习的关键。然而,对认知科学原理的关注可能不够,因为一些教育工作者持有的学习信念可能被视为认知神话。程序本文分析了五种学习误区(学习风格、纯发现学习、数字原生、外在动机、多任务处理)和五种基于研究的学习策略(双重编码、直接教学、总结、检索实践、间隔)的例子。它详细说明了每种方法的研究证据,以解释对学习的误解,以及那些未被充分利用或误解但对学生学习有益的有效策略。结论与学习神话有关的教育实践在教育中普遍存在,可能对学生的学习产生不利影响。我们建议对教育学院进行重组,以确保在教育工作者准备计划中更加重视认知科学,从而更好地推广基于研究的教学策略,以满足学生的学习需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A rationale for promoting cognitive science in teacher education: Deconstructing prevailing learning myths and advancing research-based practices

Purpose

Cognitive science is essential to designing, implementing, and evaluating instruction for enhancing student learning. However, there may not be sufficient focus on the principles of cognitive science, as some educators hold learning beliefs that may be considered cognitive myths.

Procedures

This review article analyzes examples of five learning myths (learning styles, pure discovery learning, digital natives, extrinsic motivation, multitasking) and five research-based learning strategies (dual coding, direct instruction, summarization, retrieval practice, spacing). It details the research evidence for each to explain those misconceptions of learning and also those underutilized or misunderstood but effective strategies shown to benefit student learning.

Conclusion

Educational practices related to learning myths are widespread in education with potentially detrimental effects on student learning. We recommend that colleges of education be restructured to ensure greater emphasis on cognitive science in educator preparation programs to better promote research-based instructional strategies to meet students’ learning needs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
6.10%
发文量
22
审稿时长
65 days
期刊最新文献
Applying the science of learning to teacher professional development and back again: Lessons from 3 country contexts Mirror invariance in the subsequent acquisition of a script with separate forms for reading and writing Executive functions as predictors of learning prerequisites in preschool: A longitudinal study Integrating vision and somatosensation does not improve the accuracy and response time when estimating area and perimeter of rectangles in primary school The whole is greater than the sum of its parts: Using cognitive profiles to predict academic achievement
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1