模拟麻醉紧急情况中接地的信息呈现和目光跟随:多模态分析

Keiko Tsuchiya , Hitoshi Sato , Kyota Nakamura , Takeru Abe , Arisa Fujii , Atsushi Miyazaki , Yuka Okuyama , Daisuke Kuwabara
{"title":"模拟麻醉紧急情况中接地的信息呈现和目光跟随:多模态分析","authors":"Keiko Tsuchiya ,&nbsp;Hitoshi Sato ,&nbsp;Kyota Nakamura ,&nbsp;Takeru Abe ,&nbsp;Arisa Fujii ,&nbsp;Atsushi Miyazaki ,&nbsp;Yuka Okuyama ,&nbsp;Daisuke Kuwabara","doi":"10.1016/j.laheal.2023.06.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Unanticipated difficult intubation is a relatively common problem anaesthetists face in everyday practice. Algorithms to manage the problem were issued (<span>Japanese Society of Anesthesiologists, 2014</span>), but how anaesthetists actually perceive the problem and respond to the difficulties with other healthcare professionals present is still to be uncovered. Drawing on the concept of resilient healthcare (Hollnagel et al., 2013), which values “how things go well”, this study analysed interactions in simulated emergencies between a less experienced anaesthetist (trainee) and an experienced anaesthetist (trainer). The latter took a role as a nurse and led the scenario of difficult intubation. Five sessions with the same trainer, one of five different trainees and a manikin as a patient were recorded with a 360-degree camera in an operating room at a large teaching hospital in Japan. The data was transcribed and analysed with discourse and multimodal corpus analytic approaches. In the simulated interactions, four phases of grounding (Clark, 1996) were observed in the joint decision-making process between the trainer and the trainee: (1) the trainer’s information presentation with her gaze address at the referent, (2) the trainee’s gaze following and acknowledgement of information reception, (3) the trainer’s prompt for the trainee’s decision-making, and (4) the trainee’s (or trainer’s) giving instruction to manage the difficulty. The trainer presented the patient’s condition and visual/audio information affordable in the environment (e.g., signals on a vital monitor), using verbal and multimodal resources, i.e., gaze address and deictic gestures. The participants as individual sensory agencies were engaged in the embodied process of shared sense-making in the particular context to establish common ground for joint decision-making on immediate actions required.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100865,"journal":{"name":"Language and Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Information presentation and gaze-following for grounding in simulated anaesthesia emergencies: A multimodal analysis\",\"authors\":\"Keiko Tsuchiya ,&nbsp;Hitoshi Sato ,&nbsp;Kyota Nakamura ,&nbsp;Takeru Abe ,&nbsp;Arisa Fujii ,&nbsp;Atsushi Miyazaki ,&nbsp;Yuka Okuyama ,&nbsp;Daisuke Kuwabara\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.laheal.2023.06.003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Unanticipated difficult intubation is a relatively common problem anaesthetists face in everyday practice. Algorithms to manage the problem were issued (<span>Japanese Society of Anesthesiologists, 2014</span>), but how anaesthetists actually perceive the problem and respond to the difficulties with other healthcare professionals present is still to be uncovered. Drawing on the concept of resilient healthcare (Hollnagel et al., 2013), which values “how things go well”, this study analysed interactions in simulated emergencies between a less experienced anaesthetist (trainee) and an experienced anaesthetist (trainer). The latter took a role as a nurse and led the scenario of difficult intubation. Five sessions with the same trainer, one of five different trainees and a manikin as a patient were recorded with a 360-degree camera in an operating room at a large teaching hospital in Japan. The data was transcribed and analysed with discourse and multimodal corpus analytic approaches. In the simulated interactions, four phases of grounding (Clark, 1996) were observed in the joint decision-making process between the trainer and the trainee: (1) the trainer’s information presentation with her gaze address at the referent, (2) the trainee’s gaze following and acknowledgement of information reception, (3) the trainer’s prompt for the trainee’s decision-making, and (4) the trainee’s (or trainer’s) giving instruction to manage the difficulty. The trainer presented the patient’s condition and visual/audio information affordable in the environment (e.g., signals on a vital monitor), using verbal and multimodal resources, i.e., gaze address and deictic gestures. The participants as individual sensory agencies were engaged in the embodied process of shared sense-making in the particular context to establish common ground for joint decision-making on immediate actions required.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100865,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Language and Health\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Language and Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949903823000040\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Language and Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949903823000040","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

无法预料的插管困难是麻醉师在日常实践中面临的一个相对常见的问题。管理这个问题的算法已经发布(日本麻醉师学会,2014),但麻醉师如何真正感知这个问题,并在其他医疗专业人员在场的情况下应对困难,仍有待研究。本研究借鉴了弹性医疗的概念(Hollnagel等人,2013),该概念重视“事情进展如何”,分析了经验不足的麻醉师(受训者)和经验丰富的麻醉医师(培训师)在模拟紧急情况下的互动。后者扮演了一名护士的角色,并领导了插管困难的场景。在日本一家大型教学医院的手术室里,用360度摄像机记录了同一名教练、五名不同受训者中的一名以及一名患者的人体模型的五次训练。使用语篇和多模态语料库分析方法对数据进行转录和分析。在模拟的互动中,在培训师和受训者之间的联合决策过程中,观察到了四个基础阶段(Clark,1996):(1)培训师的信息展示,她的凝视地址指向参考对象,(2)受训者的凝视跟随和对信息接收的确认,(3)培训师对受训者决策的提示,以及(4)受训者(或培训师)给出管理难度的指示。培训师使用语言和多模式资源,即凝视地址和指示手势,介绍了患者的病情和环境中可负担的视觉/音频信息(例如,生命监护仪上的信号)。参与者作为个体感官机构,在特定的背景下参与共同感知的具体过程,为共同决策所需的即时行动奠定共同基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Information presentation and gaze-following for grounding in simulated anaesthesia emergencies: A multimodal analysis

Unanticipated difficult intubation is a relatively common problem anaesthetists face in everyday practice. Algorithms to manage the problem were issued (Japanese Society of Anesthesiologists, 2014), but how anaesthetists actually perceive the problem and respond to the difficulties with other healthcare professionals present is still to be uncovered. Drawing on the concept of resilient healthcare (Hollnagel et al., 2013), which values “how things go well”, this study analysed interactions in simulated emergencies between a less experienced anaesthetist (trainee) and an experienced anaesthetist (trainer). The latter took a role as a nurse and led the scenario of difficult intubation. Five sessions with the same trainer, one of five different trainees and a manikin as a patient were recorded with a 360-degree camera in an operating room at a large teaching hospital in Japan. The data was transcribed and analysed with discourse and multimodal corpus analytic approaches. In the simulated interactions, four phases of grounding (Clark, 1996) were observed in the joint decision-making process between the trainer and the trainee: (1) the trainer’s information presentation with her gaze address at the referent, (2) the trainee’s gaze following and acknowledgement of information reception, (3) the trainer’s prompt for the trainee’s decision-making, and (4) the trainee’s (or trainer’s) giving instruction to manage the difficulty. The trainer presented the patient’s condition and visual/audio information affordable in the environment (e.g., signals on a vital monitor), using verbal and multimodal resources, i.e., gaze address and deictic gestures. The participants as individual sensory agencies were engaged in the embodied process of shared sense-making in the particular context to establish common ground for joint decision-making on immediate actions required.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Cognitive-linguistic difficulties in adults with Long COVID: A follow-up study Narrative modulations in patient-practitioner communication: Exploring attunement and misattunement in supported self-management Spoken language-based automatic cognitive assessment of stroke survivors Assessment of pragmatic skills in adults with ADHD Exploring women’s chronic disease experiences: A mixed-methods analysis of endometriosis narratives
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1