非流动性市场的顺序入账

IF 2.1 2区 经济学 Q2 BUSINESS, FINANCE Journal of Financial Markets Pub Date : 2023-06-01 DOI:10.1016/j.finmar.2023.100818
Vincent Fardeau
{"title":"非流动性市场的顺序入账","authors":"Vincent Fardeau","doi":"10.1016/j.finmar.2023.100818","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>I study the sequential entry of intermediaries into an illiquid market. As intermediaries trade with rational counterparts, market depth affects and is affected by the possibility of entry. This feedback loop between entry and depth gives incumbent intermediaries more incentives to deter entrants, creating endogenous barriers to entry. Further, whether entry occurs or not in equilibrium has distinct effects on market quality: while entry improves depth, reduces spreads, and speeds up price convergence, the threat of entry disciplines only spreads. In a contestable market, more competition leads to higher spreads and intermediaries’ counterparties benefit more from deterrence than actual entry.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47899,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Financial Markets","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sequential entry in illiquid markets\",\"authors\":\"Vincent Fardeau\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.finmar.2023.100818\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>I study the sequential entry of intermediaries into an illiquid market. As intermediaries trade with rational counterparts, market depth affects and is affected by the possibility of entry. This feedback loop between entry and depth gives incumbent intermediaries more incentives to deter entrants, creating endogenous barriers to entry. Further, whether entry occurs or not in equilibrium has distinct effects on market quality: while entry improves depth, reduces spreads, and speeds up price convergence, the threat of entry disciplines only spreads. In a contestable market, more competition leads to higher spreads and intermediaries’ counterparties benefit more from deterrence than actual entry.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47899,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Financial Markets\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Financial Markets\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1386418123000162\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Financial Markets","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1386418123000162","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我研究中介机构进入非流动性市场的顺序。作为中介机构与理性对手进行交易,市场深度影响并受进入可能性的影响。进入和深度之间的这种反馈循环为现有中介机构提供了更多的激励来阻止进入者,从而形成了内生的进入壁垒。此外,进入是否处于均衡状态对市场质量有明显影响:虽然进入提高了深度,减少了价差,加快了价格趋同,但进入纪律的威胁只会蔓延。在一个可竞争的市场中,更多的竞争会导致更高的利差,中介机构的交易对手从威慑中受益更多,而不是实际进入。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Sequential entry in illiquid markets

I study the sequential entry of intermediaries into an illiquid market. As intermediaries trade with rational counterparts, market depth affects and is affected by the possibility of entry. This feedback loop between entry and depth gives incumbent intermediaries more incentives to deter entrants, creating endogenous barriers to entry. Further, whether entry occurs or not in equilibrium has distinct effects on market quality: while entry improves depth, reduces spreads, and speeds up price convergence, the threat of entry disciplines only spreads. In a contestable market, more competition leads to higher spreads and intermediaries’ counterparties benefit more from deterrence than actual entry.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Financial Markets
Journal of Financial Markets BUSINESS, FINANCE-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
3.60%
发文量
64
期刊介绍: The Journal of Financial Markets publishes high quality original research on applied and theoretical issues related to securities trading and pricing. Area of coverage includes the analysis and design of trading mechanisms, optimal order placement strategies, the role of information in securities markets, financial intermediation as it relates to securities investments - for example, the structure of brokerage and mutual fund industries, and analyses of short and long run horizon price behaviour. The journal strives to maintain a balance between theoretical and empirical work, and aims to provide prompt and constructive reviews to paper submitters.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board The role of options markets in corporate social responsibility Oil information uncertainty and aggregate market returns: A natural experiment based on satellite data Search friction, liquidity risk, and bond misallocation Firm visibility, liquidity, and valuation for thinly traded assets
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1