碱性建筑污泥中和过程中稳定剂对CO2固定能力的影响

IF 3.3 2区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL Soils and Foundations Pub Date : 2023-10-01 DOI:10.1016/j.sandf.2023.101358
Su Myat Mon , Aya Sakaguchi , Shovon Raihan , Nguyen Duc Trung , Kimitoshi Hayano
{"title":"碱性建筑污泥中和过程中稳定剂对CO2固定能力的影响","authors":"Su Myat Mon ,&nbsp;Aya Sakaguchi ,&nbsp;Shovon Raihan ,&nbsp;Nguyen Duc Trung ,&nbsp;Kimitoshi Hayano","doi":"10.1016/j.sandf.2023.101358","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Construction sludge, generated from tunneling and piling, is typically in a liquid state. It can be improved via physical treatments, such as dehydration, and/or chemical treatments, using stabilizers, in order to to be recycled as construction material. To adjust the strength of sludge, chemical treatments are often preferred. However, chemical treatments frequently result in alkali leaching. Methods to reduce alkalinity by curing the alkaline sludge under CO<sub>2</sub> gas at a certain concentration have been proposed in Japan. In recent years, technologies that utilize CO<sub>2</sub> to improve the quality of cementitious material have received considerable attention in terms of carbon capture. Therefore, the effects of stabilizers on the CO<sub>2</sub> fixation capacity of alkaline sludge during pH neutralization were investigated in this study. Accelerated carbonation and carbonate content measurement tests were conducted to detect the CO<sub>2</sub> content fixed in alkaline sludge specimens treated with various stabilizers. The test results showed that the fixed maximum CO<sub>2</sub> content per gram of dry mass of sludge, (<em>m</em><sub>CO2</sub>)<sup>max</sup>, increased with the calcium oxide (CaO) content of the stabilizer(s) per gram of dry sludge, <em>C</em><sub>CaO</sub>. However, the rate of increase in (<em>m</em><sub>CO2</sub>)<sup>max</sup> with <em>C</em><sub>CaO</sub> was significantly affected by the type of stabilizer used. In the case of quicklime (QL), the ratio of (<em>m</em><sub>CO2</sub>)<sup>max</sup> to <em>C</em><sub>CaO</sub> was approximately 0.5, whereas, in the cases of fly ash (FA) and steel slag (SS), the ratio was approximately 0.25. The ratios for biomass ash and paper sludge ash were between that for QL and that for FA and SS. Detailed analyses of the test results suggest that the CaO content per gram of stabilizer(s) in the sludge, <em>C</em>*<sub>CaO</sub>, can provide an estimate of the fixed maximum amount of CO<sub>2</sub> per gram of stabilizer(s) in the sludge, (<em>m*</em><sub>CO2</sub>)<sup>max</sup>. However, other factors, including the amount of water-soluble Ca, should be considered for a precise evaluation. Additionally, the experimental results showed that the decrease in pH owing to neutralization increases with the increasing <em>C</em><sub>CaO</sub>. However, the type of stabilizer did not significantly affect the relationship between the degree of CO<sub>2</sub> fixation and the degree of neutralization.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":21857,"journal":{"name":"Soils and Foundations","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of stabilizers on CO2 fixation capacity in neutralization of alkali construction sludge\",\"authors\":\"Su Myat Mon ,&nbsp;Aya Sakaguchi ,&nbsp;Shovon Raihan ,&nbsp;Nguyen Duc Trung ,&nbsp;Kimitoshi Hayano\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.sandf.2023.101358\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Construction sludge, generated from tunneling and piling, is typically in a liquid state. It can be improved via physical treatments, such as dehydration, and/or chemical treatments, using stabilizers, in order to to be recycled as construction material. To adjust the strength of sludge, chemical treatments are often preferred. However, chemical treatments frequently result in alkali leaching. Methods to reduce alkalinity by curing the alkaline sludge under CO<sub>2</sub> gas at a certain concentration have been proposed in Japan. In recent years, technologies that utilize CO<sub>2</sub> to improve the quality of cementitious material have received considerable attention in terms of carbon capture. Therefore, the effects of stabilizers on the CO<sub>2</sub> fixation capacity of alkaline sludge during pH neutralization were investigated in this study. Accelerated carbonation and carbonate content measurement tests were conducted to detect the CO<sub>2</sub> content fixed in alkaline sludge specimens treated with various stabilizers. The test results showed that the fixed maximum CO<sub>2</sub> content per gram of dry mass of sludge, (<em>m</em><sub>CO2</sub>)<sup>max</sup>, increased with the calcium oxide (CaO) content of the stabilizer(s) per gram of dry sludge, <em>C</em><sub>CaO</sub>. However, the rate of increase in (<em>m</em><sub>CO2</sub>)<sup>max</sup> with <em>C</em><sub>CaO</sub> was significantly affected by the type of stabilizer used. In the case of quicklime (QL), the ratio of (<em>m</em><sub>CO2</sub>)<sup>max</sup> to <em>C</em><sub>CaO</sub> was approximately 0.5, whereas, in the cases of fly ash (FA) and steel slag (SS), the ratio was approximately 0.25. The ratios for biomass ash and paper sludge ash were between that for QL and that for FA and SS. Detailed analyses of the test results suggest that the CaO content per gram of stabilizer(s) in the sludge, <em>C</em>*<sub>CaO</sub>, can provide an estimate of the fixed maximum amount of CO<sub>2</sub> per gram of stabilizer(s) in the sludge, (<em>m*</em><sub>CO2</sub>)<sup>max</sup>. However, other factors, including the amount of water-soluble Ca, should be considered for a precise evaluation. Additionally, the experimental results showed that the decrease in pH owing to neutralization increases with the increasing <em>C</em><sub>CaO</sub>. However, the type of stabilizer did not significantly affect the relationship between the degree of CO<sub>2</sub> fixation and the degree of neutralization.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21857,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Soils and Foundations\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Soils and Foundations\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0038080623000872\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Soils and Foundations","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0038080623000872","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

隧道开挖和打桩产生的建筑污泥通常处于液态。它可以通过物理处理(如脱水)和/或化学处理(使用稳定剂)进行改进,以便作为建筑材料回收。为了调整污泥的强度,通常首选化学处理。然而,化学处理经常导致碱浸。日本已经提出了通过在一定浓度的CO2气体下固化碱性污泥来降低碱度的方法。近年来,利用CO2来提高胶结材料质量的技术在碳捕获方面受到了相当大的关注。因此,本研究考察了稳定剂在pH中和过程中对碱性污泥CO2固定能力的影响。进行了加速碳酸化和碳酸盐含量测量试验,以检测用各种稳定剂处理的碱性污泥样品中固定的CO2含量。试验结果表明,每克污泥干质量的固定最大CO2含量(mCO2)max随着稳定剂每克干污泥氧化钙(CaO)含量CCaO的增加而增加。然而,使用CCaO的(mCO2)最大值的增加速率受到所用稳定剂类型的显著影响。在生石灰(QL)的情况下,(mCO2)max与CCaO的比率约为0.5,而在粉煤灰(FA)和钢渣(SS)的情况中,该比率约为0.25。生物质灰和纸污泥灰的比例介于QL与FA和SS之间。对试验结果的详细分析表明,污泥中每克稳定剂的CaO含量C*CaO可以估计污泥中每克稳定剂的固定最大CO2量(m*CO2)max。然而,应考虑其他因素,包括水溶性Ca的量,以进行精确评估。此外,实验结果表明,中和引起的pH降低随着CCaO的增加而增加。然而,稳定剂的类型并没有显著影响CO2固定程度和中和程度之间的关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Effects of stabilizers on CO2 fixation capacity in neutralization of alkali construction sludge

Construction sludge, generated from tunneling and piling, is typically in a liquid state. It can be improved via physical treatments, such as dehydration, and/or chemical treatments, using stabilizers, in order to to be recycled as construction material. To adjust the strength of sludge, chemical treatments are often preferred. However, chemical treatments frequently result in alkali leaching. Methods to reduce alkalinity by curing the alkaline sludge under CO2 gas at a certain concentration have been proposed in Japan. In recent years, technologies that utilize CO2 to improve the quality of cementitious material have received considerable attention in terms of carbon capture. Therefore, the effects of stabilizers on the CO2 fixation capacity of alkaline sludge during pH neutralization were investigated in this study. Accelerated carbonation and carbonate content measurement tests were conducted to detect the CO2 content fixed in alkaline sludge specimens treated with various stabilizers. The test results showed that the fixed maximum CO2 content per gram of dry mass of sludge, (mCO2)max, increased with the calcium oxide (CaO) content of the stabilizer(s) per gram of dry sludge, CCaO. However, the rate of increase in (mCO2)max with CCaO was significantly affected by the type of stabilizer used. In the case of quicklime (QL), the ratio of (mCO2)max to CCaO was approximately 0.5, whereas, in the cases of fly ash (FA) and steel slag (SS), the ratio was approximately 0.25. The ratios for biomass ash and paper sludge ash were between that for QL and that for FA and SS. Detailed analyses of the test results suggest that the CaO content per gram of stabilizer(s) in the sludge, C*CaO, can provide an estimate of the fixed maximum amount of CO2 per gram of stabilizer(s) in the sludge, (m*CO2)max. However, other factors, including the amount of water-soluble Ca, should be considered for a precise evaluation. Additionally, the experimental results showed that the decrease in pH owing to neutralization increases with the increasing CCaO. However, the type of stabilizer did not significantly affect the relationship between the degree of CO2 fixation and the degree of neutralization.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Soils and Foundations
Soils and Foundations 工程技术-地球科学综合
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
8.10%
发文量
99
审稿时长
5 months
期刊介绍: Soils and Foundations is one of the leading journals in the field of soil mechanics and geotechnical engineering. It is the official journal of the Japanese Geotechnical Society (JGS)., The journal publishes a variety of original research paper, technical reports, technical notes, as well as the state-of-the-art reports upon invitation by the Editor, in the fields of soil and rock mechanics, geotechnical engineering, and environmental geotechnics. Since the publication of Volume 1, No.1 issue in June 1960, Soils and Foundations will celebrate the 60th anniversary in the year of 2020. Soils and Foundations welcomes theoretical as well as practical work associated with the aforementioned field(s). Case studies that describe the original and interdisciplinary work applicable to geotechnical engineering are particularly encouraged. Discussions to each of the published articles are also welcomed in order to provide an avenue in which opinions of peers may be fed back or exchanged. In providing latest expertise on a specific topic, one issue out of six per year on average was allocated to include selected papers from the International Symposia which were held in Japan as well as overseas.
期刊最新文献
Natural soils’ shear strength prediction: A morphological data-centric approach Estimating S-wave velocity profiles from horizontal-to-vertical spectral ratios based on deep learning Shear band analysis of silt-clay transition soils under three-dimensional stress-strain conditions Seismic passive earth pressures of narrow cohesive backfill against gravity walls using the stress characteristics method Experimental study and correction of dynamic characteristic parameters of silty clay under negative temperature conditions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1