最大限度地减少危重患者采血样本的丢弃量:可行吗?

IF 1.1 Q3 NURSING Enfermeria Intensiva Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.enfi.2022.06.004
F.J. Castro-Olmo RN , P. Morales-Fernández RN , M.J. Alcaide-Martín PhD , B. Fernández-Puntero PhD , M. Quintana-Díaz PhD , V. Aceña-Gil Msc
{"title":"最大限度地减少危重患者采血样本的丢弃量:可行吗?","authors":"F.J. Castro-Olmo RN ,&nbsp;P. Morales-Fernández RN ,&nbsp;M.J. Alcaide-Martín PhD ,&nbsp;B. Fernández-Puntero PhD ,&nbsp;M. Quintana-Díaz PhD ,&nbsp;V. Aceña-Gil Msc","doi":"10.1016/j.enfi.2022.06.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Drawing blood samples through a central venous catheter is a customary practice in intensive care units. It is indicated to discard a volume of waste blood to avoid interference in the results.</p></div><div><h3>Aim</h3><p>To determine whether a lower discard volume for obtaining blood samples from temporary central venous catheters placed into the internal jugular, femoral or subclavian vein offers valid results.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>A quasi-experimental prospective cross-sectional study for which 65 patients of over 18 years of age in intensive care units, who had been fitted with a triple lumen central venous catheter, were recruited over a period of 8 months. Two consecutive blood samples were extracted with tubes for biochemistry, coagulation and haemogram from each patient from the distal lumen. The first sample was obtained with a discarded waste of 1.5<!--> <!-->ml from a total extracted volume of 10.2<!--> <!-->ml, similar to the usual waste in our ambit (10<!--> <!-->ml). Subsequently the second sample was obtained. The paired t-test was used to analyse the data. The Bland-Altman plot and intraclass correlation coefficient were used to measure the agreement between methods. The reference change value was established as the admissible limit of variation between the pairs of samples.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 65 sample pairs were drawn (intervention-control). The paired t-test found statistically significant differences with a significance level of α<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.05 for chlorine (−0.536; 0.012); prothrombin time (−0.092; 0.019) and prothrombin activity (0.284; 1.375). The intraclass correlation coefficient was greater than 0.9 in all the variables and the limit determined for the reference change value was not surpassed by any value.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The results show the reliability of the blood samples drawn with a discard volume of 1.5<!--> <!-->ml.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":43993,"journal":{"name":"Enfermeria Intensiva","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Minimizar el volumen de descarte para la extracción de muestras sanguíneas en los pacientes críticos: ¿es factible?\",\"authors\":\"F.J. Castro-Olmo RN ,&nbsp;P. Morales-Fernández RN ,&nbsp;M.J. Alcaide-Martín PhD ,&nbsp;B. Fernández-Puntero PhD ,&nbsp;M. Quintana-Díaz PhD ,&nbsp;V. Aceña-Gil Msc\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.enfi.2022.06.004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Drawing blood samples through a central venous catheter is a customary practice in intensive care units. It is indicated to discard a volume of waste blood to avoid interference in the results.</p></div><div><h3>Aim</h3><p>To determine whether a lower discard volume for obtaining blood samples from temporary central venous catheters placed into the internal jugular, femoral or subclavian vein offers valid results.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>A quasi-experimental prospective cross-sectional study for which 65 patients of over 18 years of age in intensive care units, who had been fitted with a triple lumen central venous catheter, were recruited over a period of 8 months. Two consecutive blood samples were extracted with tubes for biochemistry, coagulation and haemogram from each patient from the distal lumen. The first sample was obtained with a discarded waste of 1.5<!--> <!-->ml from a total extracted volume of 10.2<!--> <!-->ml, similar to the usual waste in our ambit (10<!--> <!-->ml). Subsequently the second sample was obtained. The paired t-test was used to analyse the data. The Bland-Altman plot and intraclass correlation coefficient were used to measure the agreement between methods. The reference change value was established as the admissible limit of variation between the pairs of samples.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 65 sample pairs were drawn (intervention-control). The paired t-test found statistically significant differences with a significance level of α<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.05 for chlorine (−0.536; 0.012); prothrombin time (−0.092; 0.019) and prothrombin activity (0.284; 1.375). The intraclass correlation coefficient was greater than 0.9 in all the variables and the limit determined for the reference change value was not surpassed by any value.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The results show the reliability of the blood samples drawn with a discard volume of 1.5<!--> <!-->ml.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":43993,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Enfermeria Intensiva\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Enfermeria Intensiva\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1130239922000876\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Enfermeria Intensiva","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1130239922000876","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

引言通过中心静脉导管抽取血液样本是重症监护室的惯例。指示丢弃一定体积的废血以避免干扰结果。目的确定从颈内静脉、股静脉或锁骨下静脉放置的临时中心静脉导管中获取血液样本的较低丢弃量是否能提供有效的结果。方法一项准实验性前瞻性横断面研究,在8个月的时间内招募了65名18岁以上的重症监护室患者,他们安装了三腔中心静脉导管。用试管从每个患者的远端管腔提取两个连续的血液样本,用于生物化学、凝血和血象。第一个样品是从10.2毫升的总提取体积中用1.5毫升的废弃废物获得的,类似于我们环境中的常见废物(10毫升)。随后获得第二个样品。配对t检验用于分析数据。Bland-Altman图和组内相关系数用于测量方法之间的一致性。参考变化值被确定为成对样本之间的容许变化极限。结果共抽取65对样本(干预对照组)。配对t检验发现具有统计学意义的差异,氯的显著性水平为α=0.05(−0.536;0.012);凝血酶原时间(−0.092;0.019)和凝血酶原活性(0.284;1.375)。所有变量的组内相关系数均大于0.9,参考变化值的限值未被任何值超过。结论废弃体积为1.5ml的血液样品具有可靠性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Minimizar el volumen de descarte para la extracción de muestras sanguíneas en los pacientes críticos: ¿es factible?

Introduction

Drawing blood samples through a central venous catheter is a customary practice in intensive care units. It is indicated to discard a volume of waste blood to avoid interference in the results.

Aim

To determine whether a lower discard volume for obtaining blood samples from temporary central venous catheters placed into the internal jugular, femoral or subclavian vein offers valid results.

Method

A quasi-experimental prospective cross-sectional study for which 65 patients of over 18 years of age in intensive care units, who had been fitted with a triple lumen central venous catheter, were recruited over a period of 8 months. Two consecutive blood samples were extracted with tubes for biochemistry, coagulation and haemogram from each patient from the distal lumen. The first sample was obtained with a discarded waste of 1.5 ml from a total extracted volume of 10.2 ml, similar to the usual waste in our ambit (10 ml). Subsequently the second sample was obtained. The paired t-test was used to analyse the data. The Bland-Altman plot and intraclass correlation coefficient were used to measure the agreement between methods. The reference change value was established as the admissible limit of variation between the pairs of samples.

Results

A total of 65 sample pairs were drawn (intervention-control). The paired t-test found statistically significant differences with a significance level of α = 0.05 for chlorine (−0.536; 0.012); prothrombin time (−0.092; 0.019) and prothrombin activity (0.284; 1.375). The intraclass correlation coefficient was greater than 0.9 in all the variables and the limit determined for the reference change value was not surpassed by any value.

Conclusions

The results show the reliability of the blood samples drawn with a discard volume of 1.5 ml.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
23.10%
发文量
48
期刊介绍: Enfermería Intensiva es el medio de comunicación por antonomasia para todos los profesionales de enfermería españoles que desarrollan su actividad profesional en las unidades de cuidados intensivos o en cualquier otro lugar donde se atiende al paciente crítico. Enfermería Intensiva publica cuatro números al año, cuyos temas son específicos para la enfermería de cuidados intensivos. Es la única publicación en español con carácter nacional y está indexada en prestigiosas bases de datos como International Nursing Index, MEDLINE, Índice de Enfermería, Cuiden, Índice Médico Español, Toxline, etc.
期刊最新文献
Manejo postoperatorio y cuidados de enfermería tras la implantación de un corazón artificial total: scoping review Estudio multicéntrico. Percepción de los profesionales de enfermería sobre las necesidades formativas de valoración del dolor en pacientes pediátricos con disfunción cognitiva Satisfacción de los pacientes con los cuidados enfermeros en una Unidad de Cuidados Intensivos medida a través de la escala Nursing Intensive-Care Satisfaction-Scale (NICSS) El diario en la unidad de cuidados intensivos: análisis de concepto Promoción de la autoeficacia en madres con hijos/as que egresan de unidades de cuidado intensivo neonatal
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1