Md. Bokhtiar Hasan , M. Kabir Hassan , Asem Alhomaidi
{"title":"伊斯兰股票市场如何应对地缘政治风险、经济政策不确定性和油价冲击?","authors":"Md. Bokhtiar Hasan , M. Kabir Hassan , Asem Alhomaidi","doi":"10.1016/j.jeca.2023.e00333","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study explores the impact of three major risk and uncertainty indices (Geopolitical Risk (GPR), Economic Policy Uncertainty (EPU), and Oil Market Volatility (OVX)) on the Dow Jones Islamic Market (DJIM) World and the ten major sectoral Islamic equity indices. The investigation further evaluates whether the impact of these uncertainties varies between Islamic sectoral indices and the global benchmark. Our time-varying analysis shows that most Islamic equity indices are more resilient in hedging against GPR and EPU shocks compared to OVX shocks. Furthermore, the Quantile-on-Quantile results establish a positive correlation between DJIM World and most Islamic equity indices with GPR, demonstrating their robust capabilities to hedge against GPR shocks. These hedging abilities are more pronounced in the consumer goods, oil & gas, and financial sectors. The dependence structures between extreme EPU shocks and the DJIM world and consumer goods, financials, healthcare, and industrial sectors are positive only in bearish conditions, suggesting hedging benefits are predominantly limited to lower quantiles. Yet, the basic materials and oil & gas sectors can hedge EPU shocks better than the DJIM world and other sectors, depending on market states. Notably, no Islamic equity indices show resilience against OVX shocks. Our findings have prominent portfolio risk management and policy implications for investors and policymakers. These findings hold significant implications for portfolio risk management and policy strategies for investors and policymakers.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":38259,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Economic Asymmetries","volume":"28 ","pages":"Article e00333"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How do sectoral Islamic equity markets react to geopolitical risk, economic policy uncertainty, and oil price shocks?\",\"authors\":\"Md. Bokhtiar Hasan , M. Kabir Hassan , Asem Alhomaidi\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jeca.2023.e00333\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This study explores the impact of three major risk and uncertainty indices (Geopolitical Risk (GPR), Economic Policy Uncertainty (EPU), and Oil Market Volatility (OVX)) on the Dow Jones Islamic Market (DJIM) World and the ten major sectoral Islamic equity indices. The investigation further evaluates whether the impact of these uncertainties varies between Islamic sectoral indices and the global benchmark. Our time-varying analysis shows that most Islamic equity indices are more resilient in hedging against GPR and EPU shocks compared to OVX shocks. Furthermore, the Quantile-on-Quantile results establish a positive correlation between DJIM World and most Islamic equity indices with GPR, demonstrating their robust capabilities to hedge against GPR shocks. These hedging abilities are more pronounced in the consumer goods, oil & gas, and financial sectors. The dependence structures between extreme EPU shocks and the DJIM world and consumer goods, financials, healthcare, and industrial sectors are positive only in bearish conditions, suggesting hedging benefits are predominantly limited to lower quantiles. Yet, the basic materials and oil & gas sectors can hedge EPU shocks better than the DJIM world and other sectors, depending on market states. Notably, no Islamic equity indices show resilience against OVX shocks. Our findings have prominent portfolio risk management and policy implications for investors and policymakers. These findings hold significant implications for portfolio risk management and policy strategies for investors and policymakers.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":38259,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Economic Asymmetries\",\"volume\":\"28 \",\"pages\":\"Article e00333\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Economic Asymmetries\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1703494923000452\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Economics, Econometrics and Finance\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Economic Asymmetries","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1703494923000452","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","Score":null,"Total":0}
How do sectoral Islamic equity markets react to geopolitical risk, economic policy uncertainty, and oil price shocks?
This study explores the impact of three major risk and uncertainty indices (Geopolitical Risk (GPR), Economic Policy Uncertainty (EPU), and Oil Market Volatility (OVX)) on the Dow Jones Islamic Market (DJIM) World and the ten major sectoral Islamic equity indices. The investigation further evaluates whether the impact of these uncertainties varies between Islamic sectoral indices and the global benchmark. Our time-varying analysis shows that most Islamic equity indices are more resilient in hedging against GPR and EPU shocks compared to OVX shocks. Furthermore, the Quantile-on-Quantile results establish a positive correlation between DJIM World and most Islamic equity indices with GPR, demonstrating their robust capabilities to hedge against GPR shocks. These hedging abilities are more pronounced in the consumer goods, oil & gas, and financial sectors. The dependence structures between extreme EPU shocks and the DJIM world and consumer goods, financials, healthcare, and industrial sectors are positive only in bearish conditions, suggesting hedging benefits are predominantly limited to lower quantiles. Yet, the basic materials and oil & gas sectors can hedge EPU shocks better than the DJIM world and other sectors, depending on market states. Notably, no Islamic equity indices show resilience against OVX shocks. Our findings have prominent portfolio risk management and policy implications for investors and policymakers. These findings hold significant implications for portfolio risk management and policy strategies for investors and policymakers.