伊斯兰股票市场如何应对地缘政治风险、经济政策不确定性和油价冲击?

Q1 Economics, Econometrics and Finance Journal of Economic Asymmetries Pub Date : 2023-09-26 DOI:10.1016/j.jeca.2023.e00333
Md. Bokhtiar Hasan , M. Kabir Hassan , Asem Alhomaidi
{"title":"伊斯兰股票市场如何应对地缘政治风险、经济政策不确定性和油价冲击?","authors":"Md. Bokhtiar Hasan ,&nbsp;M. Kabir Hassan ,&nbsp;Asem Alhomaidi","doi":"10.1016/j.jeca.2023.e00333","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study explores the impact of three major risk and uncertainty indices (Geopolitical Risk (GPR), Economic Policy Uncertainty (EPU), and Oil Market Volatility (OVX)) on the Dow Jones Islamic Market (DJIM) World and the ten major sectoral Islamic equity indices. The investigation further evaluates whether the impact of these uncertainties varies between Islamic sectoral indices and the global benchmark. Our time-varying analysis shows that most Islamic equity indices are more resilient in hedging against GPR and EPU shocks compared to OVX shocks. Furthermore, the Quantile-on-Quantile results establish a positive correlation between DJIM World and most Islamic equity indices with GPR, demonstrating their robust capabilities to hedge against GPR shocks. These hedging abilities are more pronounced in the consumer goods, oil &amp; gas, and financial sectors. The dependence structures between extreme EPU shocks and the DJIM world and consumer goods, financials, healthcare, and industrial sectors are positive only in bearish conditions, suggesting hedging benefits are predominantly limited to lower quantiles. Yet, the basic materials and oil &amp; gas sectors can hedge EPU shocks better than the DJIM world and other sectors, depending on market states. Notably, no Islamic equity indices show resilience against OVX shocks. Our findings have prominent portfolio risk management and policy implications for investors and policymakers. These findings hold significant implications for portfolio risk management and policy strategies for investors and policymakers.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":38259,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Economic Asymmetries","volume":"28 ","pages":"Article e00333"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How do sectoral Islamic equity markets react to geopolitical risk, economic policy uncertainty, and oil price shocks?\",\"authors\":\"Md. Bokhtiar Hasan ,&nbsp;M. Kabir Hassan ,&nbsp;Asem Alhomaidi\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jeca.2023.e00333\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This study explores the impact of three major risk and uncertainty indices (Geopolitical Risk (GPR), Economic Policy Uncertainty (EPU), and Oil Market Volatility (OVX)) on the Dow Jones Islamic Market (DJIM) World and the ten major sectoral Islamic equity indices. The investigation further evaluates whether the impact of these uncertainties varies between Islamic sectoral indices and the global benchmark. Our time-varying analysis shows that most Islamic equity indices are more resilient in hedging against GPR and EPU shocks compared to OVX shocks. Furthermore, the Quantile-on-Quantile results establish a positive correlation between DJIM World and most Islamic equity indices with GPR, demonstrating their robust capabilities to hedge against GPR shocks. These hedging abilities are more pronounced in the consumer goods, oil &amp; gas, and financial sectors. The dependence structures between extreme EPU shocks and the DJIM world and consumer goods, financials, healthcare, and industrial sectors are positive only in bearish conditions, suggesting hedging benefits are predominantly limited to lower quantiles. Yet, the basic materials and oil &amp; gas sectors can hedge EPU shocks better than the DJIM world and other sectors, depending on market states. Notably, no Islamic equity indices show resilience against OVX shocks. Our findings have prominent portfolio risk management and policy implications for investors and policymakers. These findings hold significant implications for portfolio risk management and policy strategies for investors and policymakers.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":38259,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Economic Asymmetries\",\"volume\":\"28 \",\"pages\":\"Article e00333\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Economic Asymmetries\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1703494923000452\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Economics, Econometrics and Finance\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Economic Asymmetries","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1703494923000452","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究探讨了三个主要风险和不确定性指数(地缘政治风险(GPR)、经济政策不确定性(EPU)和石油市场波动性(OVX))对道琼斯伊斯兰市场(DJIM)世界和十个主要行业伊斯兰股票指数的影响。调查进一步评估了这些不确定性的影响是否因伊斯兰部门指数和全球基准而异。我们的时变分析表明,与OVX冲击相比,大多数伊斯兰股票指数在对冲GPR和EPU冲击方面更有弹性。此外,Quantile对Quantile的结果在DJIM World和大多数伊斯兰股票指数与GPR之间建立了正相关关系,证明了它们对冲GPR冲击的强大能力。这些对冲能力在消费品、石油和天然气市场表现得更为明显;天然气和金融部门。极端EPU冲击与道琼斯工业平均指数世界以及消费品、金融、医疗保健和工业部门之间的依赖结构只有在看跌条件下才是积极的,这表明对冲收益主要局限于较低的分位数。然而,基础材料和石油&;天然气行业比道琼斯工业平均指数和其他行业更能对冲EPU冲击,具体取决于市场状况。值得注意的是,没有任何伊斯兰股票指数显示出抵御OVX冲击的韧性。我们的研究结果对投资者和政策制定者具有突出的投资组合风险管理和政策影响。这些发现对投资者和决策者的投资组合风险管理和政策策略具有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
How do sectoral Islamic equity markets react to geopolitical risk, economic policy uncertainty, and oil price shocks?

This study explores the impact of three major risk and uncertainty indices (Geopolitical Risk (GPR), Economic Policy Uncertainty (EPU), and Oil Market Volatility (OVX)) on the Dow Jones Islamic Market (DJIM) World and the ten major sectoral Islamic equity indices. The investigation further evaluates whether the impact of these uncertainties varies between Islamic sectoral indices and the global benchmark. Our time-varying analysis shows that most Islamic equity indices are more resilient in hedging against GPR and EPU shocks compared to OVX shocks. Furthermore, the Quantile-on-Quantile results establish a positive correlation between DJIM World and most Islamic equity indices with GPR, demonstrating their robust capabilities to hedge against GPR shocks. These hedging abilities are more pronounced in the consumer goods, oil & gas, and financial sectors. The dependence structures between extreme EPU shocks and the DJIM world and consumer goods, financials, healthcare, and industrial sectors are positive only in bearish conditions, suggesting hedging benefits are predominantly limited to lower quantiles. Yet, the basic materials and oil & gas sectors can hedge EPU shocks better than the DJIM world and other sectors, depending on market states. Notably, no Islamic equity indices show resilience against OVX shocks. Our findings have prominent portfolio risk management and policy implications for investors and policymakers. These findings hold significant implications for portfolio risk management and policy strategies for investors and policymakers.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Economic Asymmetries
Journal of Economic Asymmetries Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Economics, Econometrics and Finance (all)
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
42
审稿时长
50 days
期刊最新文献
From debt arithmetic to fiscal sustainability and fiscal rules: Taking stock and policy lessons Editorial Board Asymmetric distance and business cycles (ΑDBC): A new understanding of distance in international trade models through the example of Iran's trade corridors The asymmetric impact of leisure externalities on economic growth Investigating the asymmetric effects of financial development on trade performance in Africa: Can digitalization, transport services, and regulatory quality drive the vision 2063?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1