欧洲市场时机

Q1 Economics, Econometrics and Finance Journal of Economic Asymmetries Pub Date : 2023-06-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jeca.2022.e00279
Anis El Ammari , Marta Vidal , Javier Vidal-García
{"title":"欧洲市场时机","authors":"Anis El Ammari ,&nbsp;Marta Vidal ,&nbsp;Javier Vidal-García","doi":"10.1016/j.jeca.2022.e00279","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In this paper, we analyze equity mutual funds from the main European countries using daily and monthly returns to determine whether the temporary frequency of the data produces changes in the identification of timing skills by fund managers that justifies the current trend in the finance literature of using daily returns instead of monthly observations for performance measurement purposes. In our analysis we employ data for 17 European countries from 1990 to 2020, we appreciate a greater significance in the results obtained when using daily returns, approximately 10% of funds show significantly positive market timing skills and the same proportion of funds show negative market timing across countries. In the present study, we show the usefulness of the increase in the temporal frequency of the observations as the use of daily data instead of monthly returns implies a greater significance in the results obtained. Our findings indicate that some mutual fund managers take advantage of the predictability of market returns explained in the finance literature. Thus, potential investors might try to identify the managers who have these timing skills to invest in their funds.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":38259,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Economic Asymmetries","volume":"27 ","pages":"Article e00279"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"European market timing\",\"authors\":\"Anis El Ammari ,&nbsp;Marta Vidal ,&nbsp;Javier Vidal-García\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jeca.2022.e00279\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>In this paper, we analyze equity mutual funds from the main European countries using daily and monthly returns to determine whether the temporary frequency of the data produces changes in the identification of timing skills by fund managers that justifies the current trend in the finance literature of using daily returns instead of monthly observations for performance measurement purposes. In our analysis we employ data for 17 European countries from 1990 to 2020, we appreciate a greater significance in the results obtained when using daily returns, approximately 10% of funds show significantly positive market timing skills and the same proportion of funds show negative market timing across countries. In the present study, we show the usefulness of the increase in the temporal frequency of the observations as the use of daily data instead of monthly returns implies a greater significance in the results obtained. Our findings indicate that some mutual fund managers take advantage of the predictability of market returns explained in the finance literature. Thus, potential investors might try to identify the managers who have these timing skills to invest in their funds.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":38259,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Economic Asymmetries\",\"volume\":\"27 \",\"pages\":\"Article e00279\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Economic Asymmetries\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1703494922000391\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Economics, Econometrics and Finance\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Economic Asymmetries","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1703494922000391","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在本文中,我们使用日回报率和月回报率分析了欧洲主要国家的股票共同基金,以确定数据的临时频率是否会导致基金经理在识别时机技能方面发生变化,从而证明金融文献中使用日回报而非月观察来衡量业绩的当前趋势是合理的。在我们的分析中,我们使用了1990年至2020年17个欧洲国家的数据,我们意识到在使用每日回报时获得的结果具有更大的意义,大约10%的基金表现出显著的积极市场时机技能,同样比例的基金在各国表现出消极的市场时机。在本研究中,我们表明了观测时间频率增加的有用性,因为使用每日数据而不是每月回报意味着所获得的结果具有更大的意义。我们的研究结果表明,一些共同基金经理利用了金融文献中解释的市场回报的可预测性。因此,潜在投资者可能会试图确定那些具备投资基金时机技能的经理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
European market timing

In this paper, we analyze equity mutual funds from the main European countries using daily and monthly returns to determine whether the temporary frequency of the data produces changes in the identification of timing skills by fund managers that justifies the current trend in the finance literature of using daily returns instead of monthly observations for performance measurement purposes. In our analysis we employ data for 17 European countries from 1990 to 2020, we appreciate a greater significance in the results obtained when using daily returns, approximately 10% of funds show significantly positive market timing skills and the same proportion of funds show negative market timing across countries. In the present study, we show the usefulness of the increase in the temporal frequency of the observations as the use of daily data instead of monthly returns implies a greater significance in the results obtained. Our findings indicate that some mutual fund managers take advantage of the predictability of market returns explained in the finance literature. Thus, potential investors might try to identify the managers who have these timing skills to invest in their funds.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Economic Asymmetries
Journal of Economic Asymmetries Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Economics, Econometrics and Finance (all)
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
42
审稿时长
50 days
期刊最新文献
From debt arithmetic to fiscal sustainability and fiscal rules: Taking stock and policy lessons Editorial Board Asymmetric distance and business cycles (ΑDBC): A new understanding of distance in international trade models through the example of Iran's trade corridors The asymmetric impact of leisure externalities on economic growth Investigating the asymmetric effects of financial development on trade performance in Africa: Can digitalization, transport services, and regulatory quality drive the vision 2063?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1