信息能力如何影响政策实施:美国、墨西哥和荷兰新冠肺炎疫苗接种计划的行政负担比较

IF 7.8 1区 管理学 Q1 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE Government Information Quarterly Pub Date : 2023-10-01 DOI:10.1016/j.giq.2023.101871
Rik Peeters, César Rentería, Guillermo M. Cejudo
{"title":"信息能力如何影响政策实施:美国、墨西哥和荷兰新冠肺炎疫苗接种计划的行政负担比较","authors":"Rik Peeters,&nbsp;César Rentería,&nbsp;Guillermo M. Cejudo","doi":"10.1016/j.giq.2023.101871","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>There is a growing literature on how policy capacities shape policy implementation. In this article we focus on a specific type: information capacity and its effects on implementation and policy outcomes. Through a comparative case study of the COVID-19 vaccination programs in the United States, Mexico, and the Netherlands, we study how a government's information capacity – the capacity to collect and process information regarding citizens, businesses, and territory – structures administrative burdens for citizens. We develop a typology of models of information capacity (infrastructural, system-by-system, and ad hoc) and explain how they influence policy implementation. We show how the infrastructural model is best equipped to absorb administrative burdens for a majority of citizens, while the system-by-system model and especially the ad hoc model tend to push costs towards frontline workers and citizens. Yet, even if information capacities may shape the affordances of policy implementation beyond the direct control of politicians and policymakers, governments still can make the deliberate choice to mitigate their negative effects by organizing operational flexibility and discretion.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48258,"journal":{"name":"Government Information Quarterly","volume":"40 4","pages":"Article 101871"},"PeriodicalIF":7.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How information capacity shapes policy implementation: A comparison of administrative burdens in COVID-19 vaccination programs in the United States, Mexico, and the Netherlands\",\"authors\":\"Rik Peeters,&nbsp;César Rentería,&nbsp;Guillermo M. Cejudo\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.giq.2023.101871\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>There is a growing literature on how policy capacities shape policy implementation. In this article we focus on a specific type: information capacity and its effects on implementation and policy outcomes. Through a comparative case study of the COVID-19 vaccination programs in the United States, Mexico, and the Netherlands, we study how a government's information capacity – the capacity to collect and process information regarding citizens, businesses, and territory – structures administrative burdens for citizens. We develop a typology of models of information capacity (infrastructural, system-by-system, and ad hoc) and explain how they influence policy implementation. We show how the infrastructural model is best equipped to absorb administrative burdens for a majority of citizens, while the system-by-system model and especially the ad hoc model tend to push costs towards frontline workers and citizens. Yet, even if information capacities may shape the affordances of policy implementation beyond the direct control of politicians and policymakers, governments still can make the deliberate choice to mitigate their negative effects by organizing operational flexibility and discretion.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48258,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Government Information Quarterly\",\"volume\":\"40 4\",\"pages\":\"Article 101871\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Government Information Quarterly\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0740624X23000710\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Government Information Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0740624X23000710","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

关于政策能力如何影响政策执行的文献越来越多。在这篇文章中,我们关注一种特定类型:信息能力及其对执行和政策结果的影响。通过对美国、墨西哥和荷兰新冠肺炎疫苗接种计划的比较案例研究,我们研究了政府的信息能力——收集和处理公民、企业和地区信息的能力——如何为公民构成行政负担。我们开发了信息能力模型的类型(基础设施、逐个系统和特设),并解释了它们如何影响政策执行。我们展示了基础设施模式如何最适合承担大多数公民的行政负担,而逐个系统的模式,尤其是临时模式,往往会将成本推给一线工人和公民。然而,即使信息能力可能会影响政策执行的可承受性,超出政治家和政策制定者的直接控制范围,政府仍然可以做出深思熟虑的选择,通过组织运营灵活性和自由裁量权来减轻其负面影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
How information capacity shapes policy implementation: A comparison of administrative burdens in COVID-19 vaccination programs in the United States, Mexico, and the Netherlands

There is a growing literature on how policy capacities shape policy implementation. In this article we focus on a specific type: information capacity and its effects on implementation and policy outcomes. Through a comparative case study of the COVID-19 vaccination programs in the United States, Mexico, and the Netherlands, we study how a government's information capacity – the capacity to collect and process information regarding citizens, businesses, and territory – structures administrative burdens for citizens. We develop a typology of models of information capacity (infrastructural, system-by-system, and ad hoc) and explain how they influence policy implementation. We show how the infrastructural model is best equipped to absorb administrative burdens for a majority of citizens, while the system-by-system model and especially the ad hoc model tend to push costs towards frontline workers and citizens. Yet, even if information capacities may shape the affordances of policy implementation beyond the direct control of politicians and policymakers, governments still can make the deliberate choice to mitigate their negative effects by organizing operational flexibility and discretion.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Government Information Quarterly
Government Information Quarterly INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
15.70
自引率
16.70%
发文量
106
期刊介绍: Government Information Quarterly (GIQ) delves into the convergence of policy, information technology, government, and the public. It explores the impact of policies on government information flows, the role of technology in innovative government services, and the dynamic between citizens and governing bodies in the digital age. GIQ serves as a premier journal, disseminating high-quality research and insights that bridge the realms of policy, information technology, government, and public engagement.
期刊最新文献
Regulating generative AI: The limits of technology-neutral regulatory frameworks. Insights from Italy's intervention on ChatGPT A more secure framework for open government data sharing based on federated learning Does trust in government moderate the perception towards deepfakes? Comparative perspectives from Asia on the risks of AI and misinformation for democracy Open government data and self-efficacy: The empirical evidence of micro foundation via survey experiments Transforming towards inclusion-by-design: Information system design principles shaping data-driven financial inclusiveness
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1