西班牙儿童普遍接种甲型肝炎疫苗的成本效益:一种动态方法

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Gaceta Sanitaria Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.gaceta.2023.102292
Cristina Valcárcel-Nazco , Esther Sanromá-Ramos , Lidia García-Pérez , Rafael Jacinto Villanueva-Micó , Clara Burgos-Simón , Javier Mar
{"title":"西班牙儿童普遍接种甲型肝炎疫苗的成本效益:一种动态方法","authors":"Cristina Valcárcel-Nazco ,&nbsp;Esther Sanromá-Ramos ,&nbsp;Lidia García-Pérez ,&nbsp;Rafael Jacinto Villanueva-Micó ,&nbsp;Clara Burgos-Simón ,&nbsp;Javier Mar","doi":"10.1016/j.gaceta.2023.102292","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of infant universal vaccination against hepatitis A in Spain.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>Using a dynamic model and decision tree model, a cost-effectiveness analysis was performed to compare three vaccination strategies against hepatitis A: non-vaccination strategy versus universal childhood vaccination of hepatitis A with one or two doses. The perspective of the study was that of the National Health System (NHS) and a lifetime horizon was considered. Both costs and effects were discounted at 3% per year. Health outcomes were measured in terms of quality adjusted life years (QALY) and the cost-effectiveness measure used was the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). In addition, deterministic sensitivity analysis by scenarios was performed.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>In the particular case of Spain, with low endemicity for hepatitis A, the difference in health outcomes between vaccination strategies (with 1 or 2 doses) and non-vaccination are practically non-existent, terms of QALY. In addition, the ICER obtained is high, exceeding the limits of willingness to pay from Spain (€22,000–25,000/QALY). The deterministic sensitivity analysis showed that the results are sensitive to the variations of the key parameters, although in no case the vaccination strategies are cost-effective.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Universal infant vaccination strategy against hepatitis A would not be a cost-effective option from the NHS perspective in Spain.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":12494,"journal":{"name":"Gaceta Sanitaria","volume":"37 ","pages":"Article 102292"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Coste-efectividad de la vacunación universal infantil frente a la hepatitis A en España: un enfoque dinámico\",\"authors\":\"Cristina Valcárcel-Nazco ,&nbsp;Esther Sanromá-Ramos ,&nbsp;Lidia García-Pérez ,&nbsp;Rafael Jacinto Villanueva-Micó ,&nbsp;Clara Burgos-Simón ,&nbsp;Javier Mar\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.gaceta.2023.102292\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of infant universal vaccination against hepatitis A in Spain.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>Using a dynamic model and decision tree model, a cost-effectiveness analysis was performed to compare three vaccination strategies against hepatitis A: non-vaccination strategy versus universal childhood vaccination of hepatitis A with one or two doses. The perspective of the study was that of the National Health System (NHS) and a lifetime horizon was considered. Both costs and effects were discounted at 3% per year. Health outcomes were measured in terms of quality adjusted life years (QALY) and the cost-effectiveness measure used was the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). In addition, deterministic sensitivity analysis by scenarios was performed.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>In the particular case of Spain, with low endemicity for hepatitis A, the difference in health outcomes between vaccination strategies (with 1 or 2 doses) and non-vaccination are practically non-existent, terms of QALY. In addition, the ICER obtained is high, exceeding the limits of willingness to pay from Spain (€22,000–25,000/QALY). The deterministic sensitivity analysis showed that the results are sensitive to the variations of the key parameters, although in no case the vaccination strategies are cost-effective.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Universal infant vaccination strategy against hepatitis A would not be a cost-effective option from the NHS perspective in Spain.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12494,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Gaceta Sanitaria\",\"volume\":\"37 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102292\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Gaceta Sanitaria\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0213911123000067\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gaceta Sanitaria","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0213911123000067","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的评价西班牙婴儿普遍接种甲型肝炎疫苗的成本效益。方法采用动态模型和决策树模型,对三种甲型肝炎疫苗接种策略进行成本效益分析:非疫苗接种策略与儿童普遍接种一剂或两剂甲型肝炎疫苗。这项研究的视角是国家卫生系统(NHS),并考虑了终身范围。成本和效果都以每年3%的折扣计算。健康结果以质量调整寿命(QALY)衡量,使用的成本效益衡量标准是增量成本效益比(ICER)。此外,还按情景进行了确定性敏感性分析。结果在甲型肝炎流行率较低的西班牙的特殊情况下,就QALY而言,接种疫苗策略(1或2剂)和不接种疫苗之间的健康结果差异几乎不存在。此外,获得的ICER很高,超过了西班牙的支付意愿限制(22000–25000欧元/年)。确定性敏感性分析表明,尽管疫苗接种策略在任何情况下都不具有成本效益,但结果对关键参数的变化都很敏感。结论从西班牙国家医疗服务体系的角度来看,通用婴儿甲型肝炎疫苗接种策略不是一个具有成本效益的选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Coste-efectividad de la vacunación universal infantil frente a la hepatitis A en España: un enfoque dinámico

Objective

To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of infant universal vaccination against hepatitis A in Spain.

Method

Using a dynamic model and decision tree model, a cost-effectiveness analysis was performed to compare three vaccination strategies against hepatitis A: non-vaccination strategy versus universal childhood vaccination of hepatitis A with one or two doses. The perspective of the study was that of the National Health System (NHS) and a lifetime horizon was considered. Both costs and effects were discounted at 3% per year. Health outcomes were measured in terms of quality adjusted life years (QALY) and the cost-effectiveness measure used was the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). In addition, deterministic sensitivity analysis by scenarios was performed.

Results

In the particular case of Spain, with low endemicity for hepatitis A, the difference in health outcomes between vaccination strategies (with 1 or 2 doses) and non-vaccination are practically non-existent, terms of QALY. In addition, the ICER obtained is high, exceeding the limits of willingness to pay from Spain (€22,000–25,000/QALY). The deterministic sensitivity analysis showed that the results are sensitive to the variations of the key parameters, although in no case the vaccination strategies are cost-effective.

Conclusions

Universal infant vaccination strategy against hepatitis A would not be a cost-effective option from the NHS perspective in Spain.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Gaceta Sanitaria
Gaceta Sanitaria 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
5.30%
发文量
80
审稿时长
29 days
期刊介绍: Gaceta Sanitaria (Health Gazette) is an international journal that accepts articles in Spanish and in English. It is the official scientific journal of the Sociedad Española de Salud Publica y Administración Sanitaria (Spanish Society of Public Health and Health Administration) (SESPAS). The Journal publishes 6 issues per year on different areas of Public Health and Health Administration, including: -Applied epidemiology- Health prevention and promotion- Environmental health- International health- Management and assessment of policies and services- Health technology assessments- Health economics. The editorial process is regulated by a peer review system. It publishes original works, reviews, opinion articles, field and methodology notes, protocols, letters to the editor, editorials, and debates.
期刊最新文献
Juntas directivas, comités y revisores Informe del Comité Científico Mesas espontáneas/Tabelas espontâneas Comunicaciones orales/Comunicações orais Comunicaciones orales rápidas/Comunicações orais rápidas
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1