图书馆情报学研究课题与方法选择的性别差异:来自三本顶级期刊的视角

IF 2.4 3区 管理学 Q2 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE Library & Information Science Research Pub Date : 2023-07-01 DOI:10.1016/j.lisr.2023.101255
Chengzhi Zhang, Siqi Wei, Yi Zhao, Liang Tian
{"title":"图书馆情报学研究课题与方法选择的性别差异:来自三本顶级期刊的视角","authors":"Chengzhi Zhang,&nbsp;Siqi Wei,&nbsp;Yi Zhao,&nbsp;Liang Tian","doi":"10.1016/j.lisr.2023.101255","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Research in the social sciences has shown that there are gender differences<span> in the selection of research methods, with women often opting for qualitative methods while men prefer quantitative methods. However, it is important to consider that research methods are generally chosen based on the research topic. To figure out the influence of gender on research method selection, a study was conducted in the field of library and information science<span>, using a more fine-grained method classification system and an automatic classification model called CogFT, which is based on full-text cognition. The findings showed that women tend to use interviews while men prefer theoretical approaches, across a range of topics. Insights into the specific research design processes that contribute to gender differences in method selection are offered and ways to promote gender inclusivity and equality in academia by considering research method use and guidance are suggested.</span></span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":47618,"journal":{"name":"Library & Information Science Research","volume":"45 3","pages":"Article 101255"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Gender differences in research topic and method selection in library and information science: Perspectives from three top journals\",\"authors\":\"Chengzhi Zhang,&nbsp;Siqi Wei,&nbsp;Yi Zhao,&nbsp;Liang Tian\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.lisr.2023.101255\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Research in the social sciences has shown that there are gender differences<span> in the selection of research methods, with women often opting for qualitative methods while men prefer quantitative methods. However, it is important to consider that research methods are generally chosen based on the research topic. To figure out the influence of gender on research method selection, a study was conducted in the field of library and information science<span>, using a more fine-grained method classification system and an automatic classification model called CogFT, which is based on full-text cognition. The findings showed that women tend to use interviews while men prefer theoretical approaches, across a range of topics. Insights into the specific research design processes that contribute to gender differences in method selection are offered and ways to promote gender inclusivity and equality in academia by considering research method use and guidance are suggested.</span></span></p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47618,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Library & Information Science Research\",\"volume\":\"45 3\",\"pages\":\"Article 101255\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Library & Information Science Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0740818823000312\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Library & Information Science Research","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0740818823000312","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

社会科学研究表明,在研究方法的选择上存在性别差异,女性往往选择定性方法,而男性更喜欢定量方法。然而,重要的是要考虑到研究方法通常是根据研究主题来选择的。为了弄清楚性别对研究方法选择的影响,我们在图书馆情报学领域进行了一项研究,使用了一种更细粒度的方法分类系统和基于全文认知的CogFT自动分类模型。研究结果显示,女性倾向于使用访谈,而男性更喜欢理论方法,涉及范围广泛。本文对具体研究设计过程中导致方法选择中性别差异的因素进行了分析,并提出了通过考虑研究方法的使用和指导来促进学术界性别包容和平等的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Gender differences in research topic and method selection in library and information science: Perspectives from three top journals

Research in the social sciences has shown that there are gender differences in the selection of research methods, with women often opting for qualitative methods while men prefer quantitative methods. However, it is important to consider that research methods are generally chosen based on the research topic. To figure out the influence of gender on research method selection, a study was conducted in the field of library and information science, using a more fine-grained method classification system and an automatic classification model called CogFT, which is based on full-text cognition. The findings showed that women tend to use interviews while men prefer theoretical approaches, across a range of topics. Insights into the specific research design processes that contribute to gender differences in method selection are offered and ways to promote gender inclusivity and equality in academia by considering research method use and guidance are suggested.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Library & Information Science Research
Library & Information Science Research INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
6.90%
发文量
51
期刊介绍: Library & Information Science Research, a cross-disciplinary and refereed journal, focuses on the research process in library and information science as well as research findings and, where applicable, their practical applications and significance. All papers are subject to a double-blind reviewing process.
期刊最新文献
The user experience of university library: A text mining analysis of a Q&A platform in China Data literacy in flux: Perspectives of community college librarians on evolving educational demands and library capacities Interpretable analysis of public library service outcomes based on ensemble learning models: Data study from China (2007–2021) A systematic review of library services platforms research and research agenda Editorial Board
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1